 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)belb ...and 94 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613410 Today 2 Topics 127499 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
pete cindy's electric brexit |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i thought i was socks but socal banaas straight up the apostrophe and what's that flying out the window? damn right. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
lol |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
chakraborty |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Sanskrit čakravartī literally means ‘wheels rolling’ (čakra ‘wheel’ + vart ‘to roll or turn’); metaphorically, it describes a ruler whose chariot wheels roll everywhere without obstruction. Chakraborty surname comes from the King Ashoka. Ashoka the great Chaktavarty Samrat. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
bloviate verklempt |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
takes peerage for whitewash of jewhate in labour party |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
jim carrey |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Wenn Sinn 'Richtung' bedeutet, dann ist Unsinn einfach nur das, was keine klare Richtung vorgibt, sondern gleichzeitig in mehrere (oder sogar alle) Richtungen weist. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
twap wabbit |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
betsy cheboygen's ramma hand band |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
there's no escaping sense. even with regards to the most radically 'senseless' things you can't help but find some interpretation according to which they makes at least some sense. .... even "xsfjwijefwef" consists of nice, beautiful, geometric patterns which uplift the heart. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the intellect makes sense of emotional nonsense triggered by sensory input of reactions to actions based on the decisions of the intellect. refusing to make sense is but one way to break this cycle |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
funky titmouse |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
but even in that case 'nonsense' is given meaning/sense. nonsense is treated as something which you have to acknowledge as nonsense. and it's seen as a challenge to acknowledge it thus. and, it seems, therapeutic meaning is given to the act of accepting nonsense as nonsense. but that gives SOME sense to nonsense .. it becomes a *challenge* one has to master to achieve well-being. ... I can't think of anything I could qualify as, so to speak, 100% nonsensical. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
can there be a visual phenomenon in which ABSOLUTELY NO patterns can be identified? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Here follows some psycho-metaphysics. If you are not hot for philosophy, best just to skip it. The Aneristic Principle is that of apparent order; the Eristic Principle is that of apparent disorder. Both order and disorder are man made concepts and are artificial divisions of pure chaos, which is a level deeper than is the level of distinction making. With our concept making apparatus called "mind" we look at reality through the ideas-about-reality which our cultures give us. The ideas-about-reality are mistakenly labeled "reality" and unenlightened people are forever perplexed by the fact that other people, especially other cultures, see "reality" differently. It is only the ideas-about-reality which differ. Real (capital-T) True reality is a level deeper than is the level of concept. We look at the world through windows on which have been drawn grids (concepts). Different philosophies use different grids. A culture is a group of people with rather similar grids. Through a window we view chaos, and relate it to the points on our grid, and thereby understand it. The order is in the grid. That is the Aneristic Principle. Western philosophy is traditionally concerned with contrasting one grid with another grid, and amending grids in hopes of finding a perfect one that will account for all reality and will, hence, (say unenlightened westerners) be True. This is illusory; it is what we Erisians call the Aneristic Illusion. Some grids can be more useful than others, some more beautiful than others, some more pleasant than others, etc., but none can be more True than any other. Disorder is simply unrelated information viewed through some particular grid. But, like "relation", no-relation is a concept. Male, like female, is an idea about sex. To say that male-ness is "absence of female-ness", or vice versa, is a matter of definition and metaphysically arbitrary. The artificial concept of no-relation is the Eristic Principle. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The belief that "order is true" and disorder is false or somehow wrong, is the Aneristic Illusion. To say the same of disorder, is the Eristic Illusion. The point is that (little-t) truth is a matter of definition relative to the grid one is using at the moment, and that (capital-T) Truth, metaphysical reality, is irrelevant to grids entirely. Pick a grid, and through it some chaos appears ordered and some appears disordered. Pick another grid, and the same chaos will appear differently ordered and disordered. Reality is the original Rorschach. Verily! So much for all that. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
So here it's claimed that the ultimate level of reality is "pure chaos". And it's claimed that it is only the human perspective which introduces order. .... BUT it is also accepted that it's possible to find order within the original chaos. So the chaos really only seems to be RELATIVE chaos: A chaos in which the seeds for various orders already always exist. Can there be a chaos in which no seeds for order already always exist? It doesn't seems so. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
words seem to be causing us some problems, here. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Here, yep |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
are we there yet? no. we'll never get there, because we're always here. now.... what time is it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
patterns are recognized on what basis, on what significance. its you that give your own significance or interpretation, or the need you have to find significance in the insignificant, therefore the amount of importance you give to patterns reconduces all to an ego trip really. im not saying it recoduces to a bad person, it depends on what situation you are in. but really it depends on how much big is your ego at that moment and the fact that your not aware that your construct is in reality an omnipotence delirium. that also can be made for fun, we are not god-like. just ignore all patterns, all coincidences, all tangents and entaglements. the more you are fooled in the good turn out, the more you will be scared in the other one. my2c |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
make fun of it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
My sort of woman is an Indian bird with a big set of badgers |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
6-14 in the closeout bent. cheboygen is painting chartreux got nammit point four; please mark this in teh ur zeppelin podbay drive hatchetd thingus. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the eleation of cheboygen was parametric to the elevation of cheboygen it what started out in/as (a) typically nonsense thread(s) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
pete cindy's electric brexit was not without casualalities. wonton bent had scattered cheap chinese lowpass filters across the international bituttcoin market wit h wikkid aplosmb ib pfnogym vltr mx |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
white sugar |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
brown succotash |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Opposed to the hylomorphic modes of oration, generated in a quasi-economically disruptive framework-structure, treating being-there as being-for, XLTRONIC, masking processes emerging in ultra-Newtonian contexts, unconcealing the discourse-governing uses of radically Leibnizian differential-calculus, queers the triumphal dominance of Mouth, rejecting its hegemony by re-constituting Hand as primary mode of world-engagement. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
because the face don't care |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
porterhouse borgoise |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
reads like squarepusher lyrics |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
no, that sounds more li,ke his interviews |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
tek wep |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
