You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
Now online (1)
big
...and 302 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Israelian justice
 

offline addi b from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2002-04-01 04:39 [#00153093]
Points: 160 Status: Lurker



What do you guys think about what is going on within the
Palestinian borders right now?
Is Ariel Sharon really intening to kill Arafat to end his
feud with him or are his latest actions just one part of his
continuing pretentious war against "terrorism"? I have two
activist friends who live in Ramallah so Im a bit afraid of
what might happen.
What is your opinion on how far one government can go to
eradicate something that they feel is terrorism against
their state, regardless of who started this supposed war and
the Palestinians right to stay there ?





 

offline astar from Canada on 2002-04-01 05:52 [#00153177]
Points: 247 Status: Regular



sharon is a fascist.

israel is terrorism.

you'd think that people who had for centuries been
persecuted and without a homeland would have some sympathy
for a bunch of persecuted people without a homeland, but
maybe i'm just stupid.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-01 05:56 [#00153181]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



I'm too unedumucated bout it to have very strong opinions,
but I'm no fan of isreal.


 

offline Aktium from cleveland (United States) on 2002-04-01 06:08 [#00153190]
Points: 1128 Status: Lurker



i just want the terrorism to end, its fucking retarded


 

offline JOB from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-04-01 06:17 [#00153198]
Points: 453 Status: Lurker



I want the idiots in power to rot for a few months so we can
all sort things out and live equally. The world is being run
very poorly.


 

offline Sido Dyas from a computer on 2002-04-01 07:09 [#00153232]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker



Listen to Long Time Coming by sam cooke and you will feel
nothing but love!!!!

Trust me


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 07:44 [#00153246]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



Israel is a bigger terrorist than Binladen ever was or ever
will be,,,, Israel invented terrorsim, 19,000 civilans died
when it invaded Lebanon in the 80s ... the jews held
numerous terrorist attacks aganist the Arabs and even the
British before 1948.... not just that but israel conducted
ethnic cleansing when it was created and threw millions of
arabs out of their homes Israel's first prime minister David
Ben-Gurion has been quoted as saying in a letter to his son:
"We shall drive them out and take their place." Slobodan
Milosevic could
not have put it better! come on! poor Arafat is no terrorist
he has no control over the bombers and its not israel
combating terrorism, the reality is that these bombers are
the ones combating 50 years of israeli terrorism and israeli
occupation!!!!!! Arafat all the way!!!


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-04-01 08:35 [#00153267]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



israelian justice?
or
israeli injustice?


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 10:30 [#00153294]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



Hi, first, to clear any doubt, I am an Israeli who has been
living in the US for the last two years. Since I grew up in
an Israel that had no political consensus about the
arab-israeli situation (which admittedly might be a little
different now), it has always been important for me to seek
objective accounts and news. There's definitely much warping
of the truth going on in various arab, israeli, and US
media, and so it's important to sample as many different
views as possible when trying to sort out the facts. I would
like to address some of the accusations that have been made
here against Israel, contributing to the discussion what I
was told to be true, as well as what I'm fairly certain to
be true. I will try to address these claims in the order
they were brought up.

addi b - "regardless of who started this supposed war": the
palestinians claim israel is responsible for the conflict
simply by taking over portions of their homeland. the
israelis maintain that they were never interested in
conflict (refer to the israeli declaration of independence),
only in settling in the territories given to them by the UN.
regardless of where the blame is placed, it is known that
the first actual offensive move in the existence of the
state of israel occured a mere two hours after its
inception, while israelis were celebrating the UN's
decision. It might be worth noting over %1 of the Israeli
population at that time became casualties in the ensuing
war, which lasted a year. It's easy to see how the
palestinians would consider the division of their homeland
to be the first offensive move, but one has to wonder
whether they should have taken issue with the UN instead,
rather than starting a war.

salma - "19,000 civilians died when it invaded lebanon in
the 80s": I'm not contesting either that israel invaded
lebanon (which is true) or the number of civilians killed (I
honestly don't know), but I can add the historical fact that
israel's decision to invade lebanon was in response to
several things. First, and m


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 10:32 [#00153295]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



most importantly, the PLO, controlled by a much younger and
handsomer Arafat was continually shelling (as in bombing)
the northern part of israel from within lebanon, a practice
that has continued long after israel pulled out of lebanon
about two years ago, and definitely at all times in between.
Israel wanted to push the PLO further north, into syria, to
cut off their bombing accessibility. Also noteworthy is the
assassination attempt of then israel's embassador to
england, shlomo argov, who was seriously wounded in the
attempt shortly before Israel decided on the invasion.

"the jews held numerous terrorist attacks aganist the Arabs
and even the British before 1948": The jews certainly did
organize attacks against the british. This happened during
world war II, as a response to the british restricting the
flow of jewish immigration coming from a holocaust-stricken
europe threatening to eliminate them. The british "white
paper", released on may 1939 allowed a total of 75,000
jewish immigrants over a period of five years, and only
under the acquiessence of the arab population. While one
cannot deny the political and geographical loss of control
that a large jewish immigration might have imposed on the
arab population, there is also no denying this was a strict
matter of life and death to the jews that wished to escape
europe. This is a fine example of an early jewish-arab
conflict of interests where both sides had extremely good
reasons to hold their own. As for jews organizing attacks
against the arab population prior to 1948, I know of no
historical record to support this, what's your source on
that?

"israel conducted ethnic cleansing when it was created and
threw millions of arabs out of their homes": First, the
actual figure is approximately 700,000 rather than
"millions". The number of refugees now, 50 years later,
numbers in the millions (well over three million) in part
due to the exceptionally high birth rate in the palestinian
population (a little over 6 children per palestinian woman
on a


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 10:35 [#00153297]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



average compared to 2.6 per israeli woman). Many
financially-capable palestinians left of their own accord,
not willing to live in a country populated by jews. Many
others were driven to neighboring arab countries during
arab-initiated wars. A fair number stayed in Israel, and to
this day have full Israeli citizenship, which among other
things allows them to vote and become members of the highest
israeli governing body - the knesset.

the David Ben-Gurion quote: Here's a good Araft quote to an
arab crowd, that's about 40-50 years more recent (1996):

"We the PLO will concentrate all our efforts on splitting
Israel psychologically into two camps. Within five years we
will have six to seven million Arabs living on the West Bank
and in Jerusalem. The PLO plans to eliminate the State of
Israel and establish a purely Plastinian State. We will make
life unbearable for Jews by psychological warfare and
population explosion; Jews won't want to live among Arabs."

You need more? I got plenty.

"Arafat is no terrorist he has no control over the bombers":
There's a strong belief on both sides that Arafat is not in
control of many if not the majority of terror acts carried
out. Then again, there's definitely solid proof that he is
active in supporting, organizing and carrying out some
terrorist attacks. For one, the Fatah, a branch of Araft's
PLO is taking responsibility for an awful lot of them.
Another thing I can think of is the very recent capture of a
50 ton boatload of illegal arms headed to the palestinian
authority *while* US envoy Anthony Zinni was trying to
mediate an arab-israeli settlement. Arafat denied all
association, but the ship's captain ultimately confessed to
having received direct orders from one Adel Awadallah, one
of the highest-ranked officials in the palestinian
authority.

Finally, I'd like say a little something about this whole
mess. If you look back through the history of the
arab-israeli conflict, and you learn enough about it, you'll
realize there are no good and bad side


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 10:35 [#00153298]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



sides in this story. We can all keep our personal tally to
figure out what side has the slightly higher moral ground.
But many people, in Israel, and everywhere else, realize how
futile this is. The palestinians are there, and they're not
going anywhere. The Israelis are there, and they're not
going anywhere either. This conflict can go on forever, get
a little worse, get a little better. But the only real
solution lies in a peace agreement. Maybe Sharon is not the
prime minister to bring that peace. Ehud Barak, the former
Israeli prime minister, offered more than Israel ever dared
offer and the most it's capable of without granting its own
destruction, and yet Arafat decided to walk away from the
table, providing no alternatives. The two points of
contention were the control of east Jerusalem and the right
of return. Israel agreed to palestinian sovereignity over
east Jerusalem barring only the wailing wall, the holiest
site in judaism still in existence. Complete right of return
would have destroyed Israel through democracy, by making the
Palestinian vote a majority (just imagine half a billion
chinese immigrating to your country of residence. now
imagine they're not interested in having YOU around and
you'll get the picture). I could go as far as say this
illustrates Arafat's disinterest in any solution that
doesn't involve the elimination of the state of Israel, but
I'll refrain. I will say though, Arafat really needs to get
his shit together in preparation for the next time a real
chance for peace smacks him in the face.

Cheers, Nir



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 10:52 [#00153310]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Salma: "Slobodan Milosevic could not have put it better".
Please, just tell me whose territory have Serbs taken by
driving others out, to your knowledge. Those who know my
earlier posts, know that I have no love for Serbs or
Milosevic, but what you say is just a stereotype, man.


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:08 [#00153316]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



ok i will first post a viewpoint article i wrote about this
subject last year which addresses many of those points:


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:10 [#00153318]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, perhaps the most complex
of all the conflicts of the world, caused a great deal of
misery to an entire people, the Palestinians. I can’t help
but question the roots and causes of this conflict. Did the
Jews have the right to create a nation at the expense of the
Palestinians in the first place?

The Zionist movement calling for an independent Jewish
community in Palestine began in the 19th century. They
claimed Palestine was their spiritual homeland promised to
them, God’s chosen race, exclusively by him! What god
would make a promise that would lead to the destruction of
an entire nation and the persecution of an entire people?
The Jews had no right to start migrating to Palestine
against the will of the Palestinians. They assumed it was a
land without a people. Can anyone lay claim to land solely
on the basis of his spiritual belief? Palestine has been
Arab for the last 1300 years. No other people had or have
the right to claim it as their own, no matter what they
think God promised them. In fact, neither the Jews nor the
Arabs were the first to live in Palestine, but the Arabs
certainly lived there for much longer.

The Palestinians responded by riots and general strikes to
the large-scale settlements established by the Zionists on
their land. They, as you and me would if we were put in
that position, felt threatened by the increasing presence of
a foreign people on their land. They knew that one-day soon
the Jews will outnumber them and that part if not all of
Palestine will become a Jewish nation. They fell victims to
trickery by those who were more powerful. In 1914, Britain
promised the independence of Palestine from the Ottoman
Empire. But in a conflicting move, came the Balfour
declaration in 1917. In it Britain promised to support a
Jewish national homeland in Palestine, and also to insure
that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil
and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities
in Palestine”.

A lot was done. After Jewish migration to


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:11 [#00153319]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



After Jewish migration to Palestine was restricted in 1939,
Zionist groups carried out a bloody campaign against the
British and the Arabs. One notable massacre is when they
blew up a hotel in Jerusalem used by the British government
killing 91 people. In 1947 the UN called for the partition
of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem as
an international zone. Israel was declared by the Zionist
groups immediately after in 1948. Arab states attacked it
but tragically failed to stop the Zionists. More than
750,000 Palestinians were forced out of their homes or fled
for their lives making way for the new Jewish state. This
was no less than ethnic cleansing carried out by the Jews;
imagine an entire people forced to leave their homes and
possessions, to leave their country, the country of their
ancestors. For over five decades those refugees and many new
generations of them have lived in appalling poverty. For
fifty years those people who now number close to four
million have been living in tents and slums so the Israelis
could prosper on the land that that was their home.


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:11 [#00153320]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



According to the Zionists, the Arabs were the aggressors
when they attacked Israel in 1948. The creation of Israel
itself was the greatest act of aggression. The Arabs
couldn’t simply stand by and watch 13 centuries of their
history disappears. Would you stand by and watch a foreign
people make a homeland of part of your country no matter how
big or small? Well the Israelis took 78% of Palestine in
1948 and the other 22% in 1967 when they invaded the Gaza
strip and West Bank. Along with that Israel took over the
Golan Heights from Syria and the Sinai from Egypt.

So many of Israel’s acts don’t just defy basic moral and
ethical laws, they also defy numerous UN resolutions.
According to international law, Israel has no right to
occupy the Gaza Strip, West Bank or Jerusalem. According to
international law, the Palestinian refugees have the right
to go back to their homes or be fully compensated for their
losses. Israel has been refusing to comply with these
resolutions, and many others, for decades. The UN gave
Israel its existence by calling for the partition of
Palestine. Yet Israel defies its decisions openly!



 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:12 [#00153321]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



Israel has now reached such a level of arrogance as to
demand that Palestinians “compromise” some of their land
and rights in order reach a peace deal. The Zionists seem to
have forgotten that they are the occupier and the
Palestinians are the occupied. The Palestinians already made
the biggest compromise they can possibly make when the PLO
recognized Israel’s right to exist, thus only demanding
the West Bank and Gaza Strip back. Israel expects this
single organization, the PLO, to give up the right of four
million human beings to return to their own homes on their
own land; this is the truly God given right, that no
individual leader nor organization nor even the holders of
the right themselves can give up.

For over half a centaury an entire people have been under
occupation, and a brutal occupying power has been causing
wars and invading nations. More often than ever before we
now hear of attacks by Palestinian groups on Israelis, this
is no more than resistance, resistance by a people who have
been striped of their homeland and left to rot! When a
country is under occupation its people have the absolute
right to use everyway possible to liberate it. Certainly,
they are not the ones obliged to compromise.



 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:15 [#00153323]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



Meho Krljic : all i know is that slobodan attempted ethnic
cleansing in the bulkun wars, sorry if i'm mistaken and
sorry if i offended you


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 11:21 [#00153328]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Salma: No problem, I feel no insult and i know none has been
ment (and I hate most of my nation anyway). It's just that
Milosevic has become such a symbol of bloodthirsty butcher
that people easily forget that in Balkan wars, every side
had similar strategy: ethnic cleansing. In august 1995,
about 200,000 - 300,000 Serbs were driven out of Croatia
practically in one day... And of course Serbs have done
similar things in Bosnia and Croatia, but those were Serbs
already living there, not Milosevic's occupation army...
Anyway, I don't want to add more confusion to an already
difficult debate here. Both, nir and you have a lot of
points, so just go on...


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:22 [#00153330]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



other quick points, its late at night now and i cn't write a
whole lot):

- The holocaust is not of arab fault so don't even try to
use it as an argument, it is not the arabs responsibilty to
componsate the jews or to help them escape by giving their
land up to them!

-israel is qiute simply and bluntly illigaly occupying land
that isn't theirs now and in the past..it is in violation of
numerous UN resolutions as i mentioned even though you
brought up the UN as a method that arabs could've used to
resolve the sitution, israel is clearly not trying to do so

-the arabs never agreed to the partition of palastine,
frankly i don't belive the UN had the right to do that in
the first place

-don't call the viewpoint article biased, because its a
VIEWPOINT article so...


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-04-01 11:22 [#00153331]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



i think it's hard for us the western ppl to make out exactly
what's going on in israel and what really happened in bosnia
etc. i don't trust the media about this.

did you know the US were dropping experimental bombs as
powerful as small nuclear bombs in afghanistan?? that's
completely insane, but you don't read about it in the paper.


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:26 [#00153335]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



cheers Meho Krljic , this debate can get very complicated, i
feel very strongly about the issue...and obviously so does
nir..


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 11:28 [#00153338]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



well, nir is an Israeli. And those suicide bombers really go
around killing civillians. I know how he feels...


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:33 [#00153342]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



well many tens of thousands of arab civilans have been
killed as a result of the occupation not to mention the
poverty and oppression caused to millions.....

i am Egyptian and 150,000 Egyptian soldiers died in wars
with israel, wars caused by the israeli occupation of
unrightful land....they occupied part of Egypt for a while,
something that makes me want to cry...


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 11:39 [#00153345]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Yeah, I know, the famous Egypt-Israeli war... Middle east
has been an area of constant conflict for as long as I can
remember (and I'm thirty, possibly the eldest on this
messageboard...) and it is all more or less due to western
interference. Fucking imperialists who make others fight
their wars...


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-04-01 11:39 [#00153346]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Netlon Sentinel: #00153331



I like your sweater Netlon - very Freddy Crueger!

(back on topic now..)
I don't think we know the half of what goes on in places
like the Middle East.
I don't really understand a lot of the political 'goings on'
in that region, but it does seem that there has allways been
trouble in that part of the world, and that maybe something
should be done to sort it out!! What though - I don't know!


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:42 [#00153348]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



i'm 17):


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2002-04-01 11:43 [#00153350]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00153346



haha!! thanks but that's not me, you know. it's the infamous
billy corgan, formerly of smashing pumpkins, currently
leading his new band zwan into greatness (hopefully). i wish
i had a sweater like that, though ;)


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 11:43 [#00153351]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Nice, you have a life before you. I've already spent the
best part of mine... So, you live in Egypt?


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:46 [#00153353]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



no i live all the way downunder in New Zealand and have been
living here for 5 years..


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-04-01 11:47 [#00153354]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00153351



Your not ancient at thirty years old - I'm 29......


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 11:50 [#00153357]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Salma: yeah, your english did seem a bit too perfect. So,
how's things down there, are there a lot of Serbs causing
trouble? As far as I know, a lot of my people try to get
there but it's not that easy...

Chris: Wait til you thirty. You'll know despair


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 11:54 [#00153362]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



thnx, i dn't use big fancy words when i talk tho, i reserve
them only for when i write about the Arab-Israeli conflict!
lol

lol no , no trouble here, by Serbs or any one else actually,
nothing ever goes on here...!



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 12:03 [#00153369]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



good, NuZealand always looked like a heaven on earth to
me... All those nice animals and green pastures... And
pleasant people (Though Maori are not too happyfor being
colonized I guess).


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 12:07 [#00153376]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



haha, not all the Maoris are upset about that, some are
still debating land issues but its all good....

i have maori mates and i've never heard them complain..its
not really colonisation i guess cause there was a treaty
signed etc..


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 12:11 [#00153379]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



i have to go soon goodnight all...... long live Palastine
and Egypt ... no offence to nir, maybe our people have been
fighting since the dawn of time but atleast he/she is a
fellow Aphex Twin fan! lol


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 12:11 [#00153380]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Well, as long as they don't go around with tnt tied to their
bodies and blow people up in restaurants, i guess you can
say it's pretty peaceful down there. Great to hear that...


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 12:12 [#00153381]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



and may New Zealand have more and more sheep....


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-01 12:14 [#00153383]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



lol no, the maoris might look scary doing the haka but
really they're as gentle as ever ! atleast the ones i know!
lol

laterz...


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 12:15 [#00153387]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



cheerz, mate


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 14:10 [#00153433]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



the base assumption of your argument is that palestine is
the homeland of the arabs, but not the jews'. I think a
short account of jewish history over the past few millenia
is in order. Jews have been living in Palestine for roughly
over a thousand years before the hardships began that would
ultimately see them exiled for two thousand more years.
After Jerusalem was conquered by the Babylonians in 597BC, a
fair amount of jews (around ten thousand) were forced to
leave Palestine and move to the city of Babylon. There's not
much known about the ones that remained in Palestine after
that point in time, but overseas jewish religion kept
evolving in babylonian exile (it's believed the jewish bible
was written during that period). A resurgence in the judaic
faith started revolving around the longing for the lost
homeland. In 533BC, the babylonian jews were finally
allowed, even urged to return to Jerusalem by cyrus the
persian, the greatest conqueror history has ever seen, to
build the second temple to yahweh, in preparation for his
"fight of good against evil". All this came to an end around
200 years later, when Alexander the greek conquered persia
in 332BC. Things went fine enough for a while, till around
70AD, when the romans destroyed Jerusalem, and began
systematically exiling Jews from Palestine. The following
two thousand years saw virtually all jews kept out of
Israel, and yet a small number of them remained in
Palestine, living under a constantly changing and often
hostile rule. The arab rule came with the rise of Muhammed
and Islam in 570AD. One thing that's important to note is
that Muhammed's fondness-turned-to-anger towards the jews
for refusing to acknowledge him as a prophet of god
(Muhammed was quite a fan of judaism initially) defined the
way Islam has regarded Judaism ever since.

So what does all this boil down to?

As you already mentioned, Palestine has been a home to arabs
for around 1300 years. But it has also been the only jewish
homeland for over twice that long. Zionism isn't work


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 14:13 [#00153435]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



working out of some imaginary directive from god, it's been
working to return to a land jews have occupied long before
Islam even existed. You ask us to look back through history,
to maintain the arabs' claim of ownership over Palestine,
but what value does such a claim have if it selectively
ignores all preceding history? No. You have to consider
Palestine to be a homeland to both the arabs *and* the jews.
Any other solution is an exercise in selective ignorance.
This means several things. You can't call the repopulation
of Palestine by jews stealing land. They have as much a
stake on the land as the Palestinians do. You *can* look
into what Israel has been doing in the last century and ask,
in light of this acknowledgement, whether Jews in Israel
have been working to become the sole populace. See, it's a
dominoe effect. The moral justification for the first
Palestinian attack on the state of Israel is ENTIRELY based
on the understanding that Jews have no right to share their
land. But that's not true, is it? And if it isn't, all
you're really dealing with here is an unsolicited and
unprovoked attack. Everything past that point may very well
be considered to be mutual escalation. Arabs kept attacking
Israel under the (false) assumption Israel had no right to
be there. Israel did its best to defend itself, and in the
process conquered territory it was never meant to own. You
can't just keep fending off attacks indefinitely if there's
no buffer zone. It's a very basic strategic truth. Israel
kept increasing the buffer zone to increase its defense
potential. Sure, the settlements were a horrible mistake,
spearheaded by a tiny minority of suicidal fanatics, but
that can be easily reversed, and such a reversal was indeed
part of the solution Ehud Barak was offering in Camp David
II. You want to know the truth? Israelis hate the
territories. They would like nothing more than to get rid of
them, but they need to know they can do so in safety. You
need to get it out of your head that Israel is a comic-book
sty


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 14:13 [#00153437]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



style supervillain interested in harming others because of
some "darnkess within". We've got stuff to do like watch the
latest simpsons and steal music on the net that's way more
interesting than dealing with this tired old crap.

And hey, if you're just interested in hating Israel for the
fun of it, to maintain whatever inner balance you have going
on right now, cheers mate, but if you're actually interested
in the truth, and you can fit the idea of a story that's all
davids and no goliaths in your head, try taking a couple of
seconds to assume I'm not full of shit, and see where it
takes you.

Cheers, Nir



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 14:18 [#00153441]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Hey, nir, quite an interesting thread this turned out to be.
I take no sides with any of you, but just want you to know
that I support you in your defence against stupid simplified
attacks on jews that we've seen at the beginning of this
thread. People bash others without thinking twice, but OK,
that's their right, and yours is to sit and explain your
views. This Messageboard is really good for it. BTW, Salma
has been offline for more than an hour now, so he'll
probably read your response tomorrow..


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 14:22 [#00153447]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



thanks meho, I appreciate the kind word

cheers, nir



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 14:24 [#00153450]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Nir, you dig John Zorn?


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 14:24 [#00153451]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



and yeah, that's a pretty accurate breakdown of internet
communication dynamics :)


 

offline nir on 2002-04-01 14:28 [#00153459]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



I don't really know his stuff, but his description on
allmusic makes him look like the IDM artist that never met a
mixing table. there's a ton of his stuff on soulseek,
definitely will check it out


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-01 14:35 [#00153464]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



He's pretty strong on zionism issue and has done a lot on
promoting "radical jewish culture" as he calls it. His band
(or I should say, one of his many running bands/ projects)
Masada does a beautiful combination of klezmer and hardbop
jazz. And he's got a shitload of interesting klezmer-(or
otherwise jewish-) related stuff on his label Tzadik. Check
them out. And that description that you give (IDM artist
who's never met a mixing board) sounds really great,
although he did meet a mixing board more than once, one of
his newer albums "Songs from a hermetic theatre" is for a
large part electronic (I didn't hear it, so i quote a
review), but ce^rtainly has very little to do with IDM or
any dance music whatsoever. I have over thirty of his
albums, so if you need recommendations...


 


Messageboard index