Israelian justice | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 136 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Israelian justice
 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:19 [#00159086]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



years. >

ummmmm, well thats nice to know, these can say that they are
palestinians.....

and also since when can countries be formed in order to
house a single race of people or a single religon???
basically anyone who is jewish can just go to israel and be
israeli....


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:25 [#00159096]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



gaza back during camp david II Arafat refused because he
wanted full right of return>

the right of return is exactly what you called it: the RIGHT
of return. it is there, it exists, it the palestinians right
to return to their homes. this is according to the rules of
the UN, the rules of basic human morality and basic human
common sense.

Arafat CAN'T and SHOULDN'T give that up. and as i said
before, the palestinians have suffered so much and already
given up so much, they are simply imho not the ones obliged
to compromise...


 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 13:30 [#00159102]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



Salma, that's sort of a trick question, isn't it? One might
ask if that country truly did exclusively belong to one
group of people, when both groups have lived there for so
long.


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:32 [#00159108]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



out of their homes in response to arab attacks, starting
with the independence war of 1948. >

well u admit Israel drove Arabs out of THEIR homes, thats
nice, now think about that statement and give back THEIR
homes.

also , its not called the war of independence , you weren't
occupied to be become independant. its called the War of not
giving back the land we just stole.

and you are the one IGNORING THE FACTS. the facts that
Israel is an occupier and the Arabs are the Occupied! Israel
is the oppressor and the arabs are the oppressed


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:35 [#00159116]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



no both groups haven't lived there, Israelis only started
immigrating there in recent times, having a jewish community
there doesn't give all these immigrants the right to claim
this land


 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 13:35 [#00159119]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



well, the thing was, Arafat didn't ask to return those
refugees to the Palestinian state that would exist if they
had agreed. He was asking to put those people into Israel.
To reiterate, that would have made Israel a second
Palestinian state through its democracy. Which brings us to
the root of our disagreement. You say that's fine because
Israel has no right to be there anyway, I say it's
inconceivable for the exact opposite. I don't really know if
there's much point in arguing.


 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 13:37 [#00159121]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



why not? how is jews being there in the last 3000 years
different from palestinians being there in the last 1300?


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:39 [#00159125]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



....This is where you'd say any attacks were justified
because Israelis had no claim to the land.>

they didn't, for the above reasons

......If you were willing to accept that both people have a
claim to the land,
then you'd need to acknowledge the attacks *weren't*
justified>

offcourse they were justified! the Arabs were watching 1300
years of their history disappear, and their land was bieng
lost, did you want them to just sit there and smile?

.....since the Israelis were always content with a peaceful
coexistence. >

you have a great sense of humour...and i'd like to refer
back to the points of Jewish terrorist attacks before 1948
and the quote from Israels first leader



 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:42 [#00159128]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



...why not? how is jews being there in the last 3000 years
different from palestinians being there in the last 1300?>

NO those jews can stay in this land but NOT the millions
more who immigrated there unrightfully, they didn't live
there for 3000 years!



 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:45 [#00159136]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



....Thinking suicide bombings and other terrorist attacks
against Israel are going to drive it into submission is
about as realistic as believing Israel can eventually kill
enough Arabs to stop their resistence. >

thats true, i agree with you for once .......i don't think
the suicide bombings will solve the problem BUT the suicide
bombing is still nothing compared to what israel has done


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:51 [#00159146]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



..Saddam Hussien is a nuclear war
waiting to happen. >

Israel has nuclear weapons, and since israel is obviously
not embarassed to use excessive force, i worry that in the
future, if israel one day finds itself losing a war, it will
resort to murdering millions, just like its great friend the
US likes to do.



 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 13:54 [#00159148]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



jonesy..... u rock!


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 14:01 [#00159163]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



well to sum up once again......... i worry that a military
solution that doesn't involve the complete destruction of
Cairo and other cities is non-existant, ..... so negotiation
is the method that should be used,,, but with the arrogance
od israel and its reluctance to accept that it commited
oppressive criminal acts and its refusal to componsate those
who suffered and return their full rights, negotiation seems
ineffective too...

Sharon that arrogant war criminal, made a comment when he
first came to office about bombing the High Dam,,, now who's
looking for trouble when you make comments like that,
insulting the few Arabs you are at peace with!?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 14:04 [#00159168]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Few would argue against people settling in Israel, whatever
religion. However, we're talking about the creation of a
state; a state which forcibly removed the Palestinians
through force i.e murder and destruction of Palestinian
homes. This is the difference.

Nir: I don't think you're willing to see the Israeli state
for what it is.


 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 14:05 [#00159170]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



Yet again, we're going back to the root of our disagreement.
I say forcibly being driven out of their land 2,000 years
ago gives them the moral right to attempt to return there,
you say it doesn't. Predicable on my part since I'm jewish,
and predictable on your part since you're arab. Maybe the
only real solution is a war.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 14:07 [#00159173]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



wait a second here: it is that the jewish people were given
a new Country by slicing chunks of other countries, nir


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 14:09 [#00159179]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



the main point of my argument is not that jews didn't have
the right to create a state in the first place,,, but the
effect of creating that state.



 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 14:13 [#00159182]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



but offcourse, the jews actually didn't have that right,
since the current owners of the land were living there,,,,
some people might say thats not important israel is there
accept it, well i accept it BUT those people must understand
still that israel is there unrightfully imho.... people
especially in the west must be informed more of the Arab
views of this,,, all Americans hear is the israeli side: the
oppressive occupying side


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 14:17 [#00159187]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



I'm Welsh, not Arabic.

So its ok that a group of people decide to invade land,
killing the inhabitants as they go? Ring any bells?


 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 14:29 [#00159206]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



That message was addressed to Salma. I was working out of
the assumption that his views were representative of the
general arab consensus. And on the off-chance the original
message was lost in my previous postings because of their
length, I'll try to keep it short this time: They didn't
invade the land, they waited nicely until the largest
conglomerate of nations in the world gave them a small part
of it, which they saw as morally justifiable on account of
their history and the holocaust just as the Arabs saw it
morally justifiable doing their best to stop them, and they
didn't go about killing inhabitants while at it, they were
attacked.

If you take anything with you to the next post, take this:
they were attacked. As in killed. As in murdered by the
thousand.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 14:34 [#00159212]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



So because of the Holocaust Zionists can do whatever the
fuck they want. Nice logic.

By the way early Zionists were in correspondence with Hitler
and blocked many Jews from migrating to the US because it
threatened their interests of an independent Jewish nation
state. Check your history dude.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 14:40 [#00159221]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



what a reposte, jonesy


 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 14:45 [#00159224]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



No, they didn't do whatever they want. Again, they waited
nicely until the largest conglomerate of nations in the
world gave them a small part of it, which they saw as
morally justifiable on account of their history and the
holocaust just as the Arabs saw it morally justifiable doing
their best to stop them. I'm Israeli and it's easy for me to
see how morally complex and ambiguous this situation is. How
come you're having so many difficulties?

As for the hitler story, I can't find any historical
references to this. When did this happen? Any place on the
net I can read about it?



 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 14:48 [#00159232]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



i said before never mention the Holocaust in your argument!
it has nothing to do with the Arabs...

..they waited nicely until the largest
conglomerate of nations in the world gave them a small part

of it>

waited nicely my ass! rememba terrorist attacks by jews b4
1948?
the creation of israel can be described as giving in to
terrorsim in itself!

bieng the largest conglomerate of nations doesn't mean you
can take parts of individual nations and hand them over to
people...!!!!!!!!!


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 14:51 [#00159237]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



"Waited nicely until the largest conglomerate of nations
gave them a small part of it"

What right of the most powerful nations in the world got to
impose anything on anyone. The problem is you see nation
states such as the US as legitimate.

My sources are a pamplet on the history of Zionism and
Israel that is now out of print. I think Noam Chomsky has
written some stuff from the view I'm taking (the truth) so
look for him on the Web. There's loads on Chomsky.


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 14:52 [#00159241]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



....No, they didn't do whatever they want>

i'm pretty sure israel has been doing what ever it wanted
for decades,,,,,


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-04-05 15:02 [#00159259]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



i'm going to sleep now,,,,,,bye


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 15:09 [#00159271]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



cheers, sal


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 15:10 [#00159274]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



No, don't go. It was two against one comrade.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 15:15 [#00159280]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



im here to watch your back, jonesy


 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 15:18 [#00159289]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



Salma, I wasn't mentioning the holocaust in relation to the
arabs. I mentioned it to explain part of the reason the jews
saw it morally justifiable to apply to the UN. If you're not
willing to look into what motivated them to do so, how can I
be expected to look into what motivated the Palestinians to
wage war? I'm not arguing either side holds a higher moral
ground, but it's important to understand and sublimate the
motives of both sides before you pass judgement.

jonesy, not sure what that means. But the US was only one
out of 56 members. Even if the US hadn't voted, there would
be 32 votes for the state of Israel against 13, well over
the two thirds necessary for a vote to pass. And except for
Cuba and Greece, all votes against Israel came from Muslim
and Asian nations. All other european nations either voted
for Israel, or abstained. You ask, what right of the most
powerful nations in the world got to impose anything on
anyone. I'm assuming you're asking what moral right they had
in the issue. I'd hazard guessing many of the voting nations
felt it was morally justifiable to give a small part of an
area that was in control of the british at the time, and was
only populated to a fraction of what the land could take if
it could help avoid an atrocity of such magnitude as the
holocaust.

I'll do my best to track down that Hitler story. I'll admit
I'm a little surprised not to see any mention of it in
chronicles of jewish history that are otherwise very happy
to point out Israel's wrongs (see the Sabra&Shatilla
account). Maybe Chomsky has something for me in this
regard.



 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 15:22 [#00159301]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



is it a me against you sort of thing? I actually learned a
ton from the research I did for this discussion. I'm not
trying to "fight" any of you. I actually learned a lot about
the opposing view of things.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 15:29 [#00159318]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Nah man, it ain't a me vs you thing. I take this as a chance
to discuss a really important issue. No bad feelings mate.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 15:33 [#00159327]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



jonesy just really hates post-structuralist reasoning,
that's when he gets all flamed up. Otherwise he's pure
vanilla


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-04-05 15:44 [#00159343]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



yet this [post-structuralism] is essentially what it boils
down to ... :)

still - i like vanilla.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 15:46 [#00159347]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



I like vanilla and chocolate and almonds


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 15:47 [#00159348]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Post structuralism - rwoarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr


 

offline nir on 2002-04-05 15:49 [#00159353]
Points: 77 Status: Lurker



so hey, on the off-chance any san-franciscans will read this
after 100+ posts of political bore, who's going to to see
plaid on the 10th?


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-04-05 15:58 [#00159369]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



mmm.. i like nuts, almonds, cashew ain't bad 'tall, infact,
4 brazillian nuts contain the recommended daily intake of
selenium, not much of a chocolate fan though ..

hey jonesy (while i'm not exactly a scholar on
post-structuralism) surely you have to see it for what it
is. i mean .. yeah - its futile to some extent i guess
[hehe] .. but to me there are some fundamental elements in
it [basically the non-absolute assumption] that seem to
permeate so many things around us?? [its quite late so am
fumbling for words a bit]

i don't know ... it gets to the point where any assertion
one makes undermines itself - ?



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 16:03 [#00159376]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



I'd like to contribute to this debate, but I'll be leaving
in a couple of minutes...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 16:05 [#00159382]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Have a good weekend you post-modernist sod


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-04-05 16:10 [#00159389]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



relativism in a normative sense ?!

^ seems to face a self referential inconsistency to me ..
mmhhh.. going a little off topic here.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 16:11 [#00159392]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



see, ya, jonesy, and all others


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-05-16 09:04 [#00222001]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Someone just sent me this. I guess most of you can't speak
Spanish but the pictures say enough.

http://sociologia.usal.es/mfe/images/Fotos%20asesinatos%20d
e%20palestinos.Castellano.htm


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-05-16 09:10 [#00222004]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to jonesy: #00222001



Fucking shit mate, I was surfing for some fine porn and you
had to post us THIS. I'm not into snuff, thought you knew...


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-05-16 09:21 [#00222022]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



i loved this topic because i made so much sense..

jonsey ur link didn't work.....


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-05-16 09:23 [#00222028]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Salma, you sexy Latin bitch, the link works. Make sure you
get both parts... for some reason if a link is on more than
one line, and you cut and paste, you won't get all of it.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-05-16 09:24 [#00222029]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to Salma Hayek: #00222022



Salma, you have to cut and paste it in two turns: the first
row first and then the second.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-05-16 09:24 [#00222030]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00222029



Ehh, ophecks got there before me... Power to you ophecks


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2002-05-16 09:35 [#00222043]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular



thnx it works now....nice to see Israel is bieng her unique
self as usual...


 


Messageboard index