|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-03-29 02:33 [#00148234]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
I'd have to say SAW II...
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-29 02:33 [#00148235]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
saw2 off course! that old shit sucks!
|
|
xlr
from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-29 02:35 [#00148238]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular
|
|
Saw II
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2002-03-29 02:36 [#00148239]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
SAW II
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2002-03-29 02:37 [#00148240]
Points: 27790 Status: Regular
|
|
I'd have to say nothing as no-one really cares what i say anyway
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2002-03-29 02:37 [#00148243]
Points: 27790 Status: Regular
|
|
its an unfair comparison
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-29 02:38 [#00148244]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
but...hm...maybe it doesnt suck that much but...some of the tracks on saw 1 are kinda cool..but is total crap compared to saw 2
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2002-03-29 02:40 [#00148247]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00148240
|
|
shut up earthleakage!! we don't care what you say anyway!!
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2002-03-29 02:41 [#00148249]
Points: 27790 Status: Regular
|
|
you were right the first time
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-03-29 02:42 [#00148251]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
Hey SAW is awesome, but The SAW II ambience is a lot better...
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-29 02:42 [#00148252]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
dont underestimate the power of sido dyas earthleakage!!
|
|
Zen Storm
from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-03-29 02:45 [#00148254]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker
|
|
no one can deny the superiorority of SAW II
|
|
raimons
from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-29 02:45 [#00148255]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker
|
|
anyway or anyhow... i really like saw2 it must be one of my fav records..
|
|
aron
from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-03-29 02:51 [#00148258]
Points: 3756 Status: Lurker
|
|
it really depends on what kind of mood i'm in actually...
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-03-29 03:07 [#00148296]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
SAW2, definitely. A lot of SAW 85-92 isn't even all that ambient... Green Calx?!?!?! SAW2 delivers the goods, folks. Delivers them mother fucking goods, time after time. Baby.
|
|
aperson
from Brentwood, TN (United States) on 2002-03-29 03:22 [#00148315]
Points: 1134 Status: Lurker
|
|
SAW 85-92 all the way. I don't care what you say, Ageispolis is the best Aphex Track ever. Tha and Xtal are close seconds as well. Green Calx is also great too... but not really ambient.
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-03-29 03:32 [#00148327]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah, SAW85-92 for me as well... I think it's awesome... as is SAWII, but it's not really my cup of tea right now...
|
|
blue_clax
from Edmonton (Canada) on 2002-03-29 03:39 [#00148339]
Points: 411 Status: Regular
|
|
SAW 85-92 for me too... I love that old school shit!
|
|
Asche XL
on 2002-03-29 03:39 [#00148341]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker
|
|
2!!!
|
|
Martytan
from somewhere in upstate new york (United States) on 2002-03-29 03:47 [#00148353]
Points: 757 Status: Regular
|
|
some of SAW is rather good, some is just cheesy crap....but that doesn't mean it's bad.... it has a very unique feeling to it.
I personally prefer SAW II.
|
|
steve
from chicago on 2002-03-29 04:37 [#00148385]
Points: 1156 Status: Lurker
|
|
Saw II is one of those albums I listen to that makes me glad i'm alive. I do like SAW 85-92 a great deal, but it doesn't hit me as deep as II does.
|
|
jand
from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-29 05:02 [#00148396]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Sad Story: in the dim and distant past, I once spent a entire year just listeing to SAWI...(not 24/7 but it never left my walkma, and my walkman seldom left me...)...
So I'm pretty fond of that CD....
I think it's difficult to decide really tho...SAWII is so much diff than SAWI that it couldn't been diff artists (aprt from that AFX "sound" that instantly marks him out)...
PLUS I think people forget the shock of SAWI when it first appeared plus the young age of rdj...theres was NOTHING like it...today you kids are spolt (j/k)..;)...everyone & their dog has got FL or whatever and can produce decent stuff - consdiering rdjs kit in those days, I think the CD still stands up very well...
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-03-29 05:08 [#00148405]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
SAWII is too long for me...
|
|
program
on 2002-03-29 05:21 [#00148419]
Points: 52 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think SAWII is timeless....SAWI has aged a bit, its more electro I think but catchy. I love tha though and that agepolis song. SAW II is deep. SAW II has alot of soul.
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-03-29 05:23 [#00148420]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
I love pretty much all of SAW85-92... Hedphelym is my least favorite, and Ptolemy sounds a bit cheap, but is still good... SAWII I like, but not quite as much...
|
|
nanotech
from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-03-29 07:17 [#00148547]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular
|
|
i'd have to say saw2,
and saw1 is really s *A* w, it's more "here's some stuff i've been working on in this part of my life, here"
they're truely to diffrent to choose
|
|
nanotech
from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-03-29 07:17 [#00148548]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular | Followup to nanotech: #00148547
|
|
is=isn't "saw1 ISN'T..."
|
|
IronLung
from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2002-03-29 07:33 [#00148561]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
II II II II II II II II II II II II
|
|
nanotech
from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-03-29 07:35 [#00148565]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular | Followup to IronLung: #00148561
|
|
i have to agree :) saw2 is so creative when it comes to ambient, also i turely don't think rdj knew what he was doing, which does create some pretty bizzare outcomes.
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2002-03-29 08:04 [#00148588]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to program: #00148419
|
|
Maybe I prefer the easier SAW 85-92, but I agree with you about your considerations.
|
|
E-man
from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2002-03-29 08:09 [#00148589]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular
|
|
very hard to decide, but i'd go with sawII, i just listen to it more than saw85-92, that doesn't mean it's better just i like it more... :)
|
|
LeCoeur
from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-03-29 08:10 [#00148591]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker
|
|
SAW II....it's my first Aphex purchase and the one that i love the most.....even more than drukqs........=)
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-03-29 08:11 [#00148593]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
Same here...
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-03-29 20:39 [#00149220]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00148591
|
|
you don't even OWN saw ;P nor have you heard it! but you'd probably not like it as much as saw2, to be fair..
|
|
steve
from chicago on 2002-03-29 20:42 [#00149223]
Points: 1156 Status: Lurker
|
|
Just curious, how much did you guys pay for SAW 85-92? I had to shell out 20 bucks for it, plus tax. I'm sure I could've gotten it cheaper, but I saw it at Tower and it was one of those impulse purchases.
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-29 20:44 [#00149227]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
SAW II
|
|
Messageboard index
|