|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2008-10-22 10:57 [#02247325]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
I have just heard one track from this and to be honest it isn't bad. Will 2008 be the year of a half decent albums from has-been rock bands?
|
|
1up
from greater manchester (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-22 11:09 [#02247330]
Points: 2302 Status: Regular | Followup to 010101: #02247325
|
|
[copy paste from previous thread>] "i think if he called it a solo album he would get a lot more
respect for it than what he's going to get. it's not guns n'
roses. can't see him calling it a solo album because he took
the rest of the band to court to keep the name didn't he?..."
-since i listened to the leak, and re-dug out 'appetite for destruction', i have come to the conclusion that 'Chinese Democracy' is shite.
i still think he should call it a solo album.
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2008-10-22 11:49 [#02247345]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
I fully expected it to be shiter than shite, but as with Metallica I was pleasently surprised. It will never hold up againt Appetite for Destruction but I admire him for not making a typical G'n'R sounding album.
|
|
1up
from greater manchester (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-23 09:27 [#02247586]
Points: 2302 Status: Regular
|
|
there's a countdown on his web page now. . .
linklinkylink
|
|
x0hx
from Lysdexia (United States) on 2008-10-23 21:47 [#02247775]
Points: 1318 Status: Regular
|
|
will there be tour? I dont like the new track, sawree what was that one that they were playin last year or whatever, it sounded better
|
|
9000
from Tempe (United States) on 2008-10-24 19:00 [#02248008]
Points: 98 Status: Regular
|
|
guns n roses uh suck
|
|
9000
from Tempe (United States) on 2008-10-24 19:00 [#02248009]
Points: 98 Status: Regular
|
|
guns n roses have uh sucked
|
|
Spprw
from Czech Republic on 2008-10-28 08:39 [#02248528]
Points: 41 Status: Regular
|
|
I don't know why the people who say 'oh this will suck' feel that way. think about it. most people come out with an album every two years or so, right? and those releases have 10+ songs on them. it's not like they've ONLY come up with 10 during that 2 year span of time, those are just the best of what they've come up with. imagine that after almost 10 years, maybe more! that's a few albums, enough to compile from that a greatest hits package - bands/artists have done that with much less..
from what I've heard, the album is classic material. really strong tracks. and, of course, if you don't like guns n' roses/axl rose to begin with, you might not like it. but those people attack it before they've heard note one. not fair to axl! stop it. aren't you interested to hear something that an artist has taken so seriously for so long? I think more people should take longer with their shit too!!
|
|
1up
from greater manchester (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-28 09:13 [#02248530]
Points: 2302 Status: Regular | Followup to Spprw: #02248528
|
|
i've heard 9 tracks and in my opinion it's shit. i was hoping it would be good too.
if it was any more MOR it would be the white lines.
|
|
Spprw
from Czech Republic on 2008-10-28 09:21 [#02248532]
Points: 41 Status: Regular
|
|
I know what you mean. some of what I heard was so mor that it didn't make sense - like why did THAT make the cut!?
but there are some songs on there that I think are the best he's written.
I don't know, I'm excited. aha
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2008-11-20 08:58 [#02253744]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
...I actually quite like it. I'm biased towards anything with Bucket on it but yeah... not bad at all. Spot on review of it on avclub.com if anyone cares
|
|
Messageboard index
|