[3hrs] INLAND EMPIRE | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 449 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[3hrs] INLAND EMPIRE
 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2008-09-12 15:22 [#02236383]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



i just finished watching this. it was hard work.

i like it, but i think i prefer Lynch's older films. also
Mulholland Drive - there was something about it that felt
different, in a wrong way :-s

next up is Wild At Heart (when it arrives)


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2008-09-12 15:23 [#02236384]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Why follow?


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2008-09-12 15:25 [#02236388]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #02236384



why stop and stare?


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2008-09-12 16:56 [#02236413]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular



its his best its excellent


 

offline Falito from Balenciaga on 2008-09-12 17:08 [#02236414]
Points: 3974 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i enjoy a lot the scene where Laura Dearn is dying meanwhile
talks
to the nigger woman,there on the sidewalk...memorable cinema
indeed.

but yes,Lynch could be seem old for some peoples now..but
everybody knows it can be very enjoyable.random hearts
films.


 

offline Flappypants on 2008-09-12 17:38 [#02236418]
Points: 132 Status: Lurker



Pretentious garbage.


 

offline Cliff Glitchard from DEEP DOWN INSIDE on 2008-09-12 17:54 [#02236423]
Points: 4158 Status: Lurker



i still haven't seen this, i keep forgetting to buy it,
everytime i go in HMV i go blank.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-12 21:22 [#02236452]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to Flappypants: #02236418



I completely understand why people may not like it, but why
call 'Inland Empire' pretentious? I see nothing pretentious
about it, especially considering how David Lynch himself
talks about it. All he's ever claimed is that he followed
his intuition, filmed a bunch of unrelated clips on DV of
ideas he liked, then felt there was some sort of 'story'
thing he could shoot to connect those separate ideas. He
never pretends it's anything more than it is, and doesn't
seem to mind what the hell people make of it themselves. I
actually really enjoy the film; it just dribbles on on its
own eccentric course, and you can get lost in the atmosphere
without worrying why he's doing that or why she's screaming
at a clone of herself on the other side of the street.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2008-09-12 21:31 [#02236456]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i thought it was shit

like 3 crappy movies edited together


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2008-09-12 21:36 [#02236457]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular



What would each of these 3 crappy movies be about?


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-13 02:11 [#02236489]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




some amazing images. the intro is class, as is girl from
pumona section. but i hate the dance sequence outro (a nod
to 8 1/2 i think) and it relies too much on established
lynchian tricks that you've seen before. amazing sound
design tho.


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2008-09-13 05:34 [#02236513]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular



too hard and long for me... i enjoyed the trip, but i was to
messy for my brain...

also
Mulholland Drive - there was something about it that felt
different, in a good way... his best film to me

i guess im not a pure lynch fan


 

offline rudster from the glasgow on 2008-09-13 05:46 [#02236516]
Points: 3169 Status: Lurker



just re watched twin peaks season 1 onto season 2 now, this
is still and always will be his best work, still the only
thing to give me chills

here is one of many scenes with bob, scariest character ever
devised

bob


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2008-09-13 05:50 [#02236517]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i don't dare look at that clip. definitelly the scariest
character ever put on film. and it happened by chance


 

offline PS on 2008-09-13 08:44 [#02236549]
Points: 1876 Status: Lurker



Yeah, wasn't Bob doing the lighting on set or something?
Plenty of chilling was done of Fire Walk With Me, as well.
I'll never look at ceiling fans the same way again!

Here's an interview with Angelo Badalamenti: LAZY_TITLE


 

offline KSC2-303 from CHELMSFORD, ESSEX (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-13 11:16 [#02236569]
Points: 65 Status: Lurker



I LOVE lynch. He was my main case study in the last year of
A level and yes, some of hes films are very over analysed
(especially Eraserhead) you'll probabley never come to his
'true' meaning which is why he loves people to come away
with there own interpretations.

also, alot of people find a deep feeling of satisfaction
after watching Lynch's films having not understood them at
all.

Remember - Its all about the doughnut, not the hole.


 

offline BoxBob-K23 from Finland on 2008-09-15 04:42 [#02236825]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular



After Mulholland Drive, this is my favourite Lynch film.

Due to its nature, it has a few parts I don't like, but I
think the emergent storyline is very gripping and the
audio-visual style of the film just blows me away.


 

offline Spprw from Czech Republic on 2008-09-15 07:40 [#02236845]
Points: 41 Status: Regular



oh my god. it's one of the greatest things I've seen in
years. ..definitely the most exciting. it's not a scary
movie in the sense that scary movies are, you know? but it
is by far the most FRIGHTENING movie I have ever seen.
there's no setup for the things that come at you, it doesn't
build up tension etc, it just comes screaming at you and
punches you in the face out of the blue. so great.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-15 10:11 [#02236863]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



I really like the way it does the "film within a film within
a film" thing so seamlessly, without any distracting plot
elements to explain why we're moving between these different
worlds. You can theorize about what's going on if you want,
or you can just enjoy the ride with all its surprising
twists and turns.

The best example of that is after the homeless folks'
conversations while (spoiler) she's dying and the camera
pulls back, revealing another camera filming them and it
ending up being all a film set. And then off she goes, and
reality melts into fantasy (?) for the rest of the film
again, just like that, with no explanation. Or when
(spoiler) her world collides with the rabbits, and she rings
them up, only to be laughed at by their own audience,
whoever they are (and that other strange girl in the hotel
room is watching all of this too, I presume...maybe...)

But that's what makes it so enjoyable and relaxing to watch,
for me. It just goes where it wants with seemingly no regard
for conventional logic, and either you enjoy indulging in
that for three hours or you don't.


 

offline PS on 2008-09-15 10:38 [#02236871]
Points: 1876 Status: Lurker



The only weak spots are the straight ones. The exposition
with Nikki and Devon is completely necessary, but it has
this knowing smugness to it that's really hard to explain.
These feelings for me reach their peak during that
"Hollywood TV Show" scene; I'll never like that scene.
There's absolutely no chemistry between those two actors,
and this may be intentional. I love this movie!

Also, if you haven't seen it yet, I recommend Ingmar
Bergman's "Persona". It plays like the backbone of
"Mulholland Drive", plus it's got them "snap, it's just a
movie" tricks that always, and i say always, break our
hearts.


 


Messageboard index