MB Feature Suggestions II | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
dariusgriffin
...and 401 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614249
Today 18
Topics 127550
  
 
Messageboard index
MB Feature Suggestions II
 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-01 13:47 [#00424217]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



obviously once everything else is set and ready to go (all
the more important things) I think it'd be cool that if
we're gonna be forced to use 12kb avatars, maybe have a
large set of premade avatars we can all choose from (if you
can't and/or don't wanna upload one yourself)


 

offline uzim on 2002-11-01 13:53 [#00424223]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



i don't know if it would be a good idea...
many people having the same avatar... could be confusing


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-01 13:55 [#00424226]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



it works just fine over at www.zug.com/gab

i think if we had enough to choose from, plus people using
their own uploaded avatar, it could be pretty cool


 

offline Sido Dyas from a computer on 2002-11-01 13:56 [#00424229]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker



yeah, and it would be very boring me thinks!

I say lets have a 10000...kb limit instead =)


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-11-01 13:57 [#00424230]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



everyone should be forced to use a picture of john craven
from newsround from the 70s as thier avatar


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-01 13:58 [#00424232]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



hmm.. true, it does get a little repetitive at the site i
mentioned above


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-11-01 14:02 [#00424234]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to BILE: #00424232



all the stored avatars that wouldnt get used would be a
waste of server space too, wouldnt they?


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-01 14:03 [#00424236]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



they'd only be 12kb or smaller obviously, so i doubt it'd be
any more of a waste than what it is right now


 

offline child810 from boston (United States) on 2002-11-01 14:05 [#00424238]
Points: 2103 Status: Lurker



it would be good for those who don't have the software or
ability to make their own, but I think peoples personalities
can be seen in their changing selection of home grown
avatars


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-01 14:07 [#00424240]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular | Followup to child810: #00424238



that's what i mean. it could at least be an option to
someone who doesn't have the ability to resize/compress
and/or even find an image to use


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-11-01 16:13 [#00424327]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



No two avatars should ever be exactly alike. It's just a
rule of thumb.


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-01 16:15 [#00424328]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



hmm... alright, maybe some kind of java/flash thing on the
site that someone can use to manually create a 12kb 60x80
avatar for them? that'd make them all original, and still
give the option to a user who can't resize or compress
files, doesn't have the software, or whatever


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-11-01 16:17 [#00424332]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



but everyone does have an avatar already


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-01 16:48 [#00424344]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



this would be for new people obviously


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-11-01 17:10 [#00424353]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



sounds like its not really a problem..


 


Messageboard index