Invisibilty Cloak | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
big
...and 360 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614225
Today 7
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
Invisibilty Cloak
 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2002-10-11 03:48 [#00399833]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



What would you do with one?

I'd eaves drop on all my mates and see what they say about
me

and I'd follow Jar around to make sure he hasen't got any
bitches =oD


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 03:50 [#00399835]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I'd follow you around, following Jar around making sure you
both didn't have bitches!!

:P


 

offline Toejam from Perth (Australia) on 2002-10-11 03:51 [#00399836]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular



I would sneak into my local record store at night and steal
every cd from the electronica section!


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 03:53 [#00399838]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



Seriously though, I'd just enjoy playing practical jokes on
people...nothing to hurt anyone though!


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 03:56 [#00399843]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



You al^know I am going to say something nasty related to sex
so I'll just spare myself the effort.

*insert ghastly content here*


 

offline Toejam from Perth (Australia) on 2002-10-11 03:57 [#00399844]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular



yes. you could be a poltergeist!


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 03:57 [#00399845]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I'd walk tound all day with my cock hanging outside of the
cloak. I'd love to see peoples faces as this cock just
floats past them. They'd be too shocked to do anything. I'd
also try and find a girl who was willing to let me wear the
claok while having sex in front of a mirror. Be weird for
both of us. Am I disturbed? I hope not. Someone agree with
me that it'd be a good idea. Please?


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 03:57 [#00399846]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399843



Hah - the same old Meho, we all love!

Hehehehehehe


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 03:57 [#00399847]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399843 | Show recordbag



I did it instead Meho so your innocent for once.


 

offline Toejam from Perth (Australia) on 2002-10-11 03:57 [#00399848]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular



sorry, meho. my post was meant for J Chris


 

offline Toejam from Perth (Australia) on 2002-10-11 03:58 [#00399851]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular



damn, you guys beat me again!!


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 04:02 [#00399855]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker



Man I'd love throw icecream everywhere!

so cool.

?


 

offline Spikee Dragon from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 04:02 [#00399856]
Points: 4176 Status: Regular



I'd use it so I could snooze without worry of being woken
up. I'd bite anyone who bumped into me tho.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 04:05 [#00399860]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Gigi, thanks for keeping the depravity level on this MB
high.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 04:06 [#00399862]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399860 | Show recordbag



I like to be consistent.


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2002-10-11 04:06 [#00399863]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



you could go around pushing people over so that they blame
the person behind them, or just whisper in people's ears =o.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 04:11 [#00399870]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to giginger: #00399862



That's why I like you. That's why I'm like you.

Seriously now, I'd probably walk into as many banks as
possible and get away with cash.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 04:14 [#00399876]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399870 | Show recordbag



I've gone all red. The Banks thing sounds like fun.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-10-11 04:14 [#00399877]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I'd hide in a record store then take everything I wanted out
of it when it had closed. I'd also use it to cover a guy I
dislike's car so that other cars would try and "park" where
it was :)


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 04:18 [#00399880]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to giginger: #00399876



Fun and useful too.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 04:24 [#00399885]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00399877 | Show recordbag



Ceri: That's a great idea.

Meho: Too true.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 04:26 [#00399889]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



A criminal sits in each one of us waiting a proper moment to
be unleashed.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 04:28 [#00399892]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399889 | Show recordbag



That's scarily true. You should put that in the interesting
facts thread.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 04:34 [#00399898]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to giginger: #00399892



I'll let you do that instead. I'll think of something else.
Because I am not sure this is a fact. What is the definition
of a criminal? Is that a state of mind or a social category
etc.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 04:37 [#00399901]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



crim·i·nal Pronunciation Key (krm-nl)
adj.
Of, involving, or having the nature of crime: criminal
abuse.

Relating to the administration of penal law.

Guilty of crime.

Characteristic of a criminal.
Shameful; disgraceful: a criminal waste of talent.

n.
One that has committed or been legally convicted of a crime.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 04:48 [#00399903]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to giginger: #00399901



Yes, yes, all this is well and good, but those are after-the
fact definitions, what I am saying does your mentallity make
you a criminal or is it the social context or something
else...


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 04:56 [#00399906]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399903 | Show recordbag



Ooooh tricky. Well I think everyone has a criminal part to
them. With most it's just a thinking process but then
there's the few who act on their thoughts. So in essence
everyone is a criminal but only a minority are physically
criminal.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 04:59 [#00399910]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to giginger: #00399906



Still: you haven't exactly pinpointed (i probably misused
that word, but what the hell) what a criminal is. Is being
violent equal to being a criminal? Yes if you beat people in
the street, no if you box in the ring. In this cas, it takes
social context. We are criminal only in relation to
legislation methinks, not having it be part of our, er,
personality.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 05:04 [#00399918]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399910 | Show recordbag



So what your saying is although two acts can be the same
it's the circumstances under which they're committed that
define it's place as a criminal act. Your boxing one is a
good example. Someone punching someone in a street fight and
breaking their nose would be classed a criminal but in a
boxing ring it would be deemed "acceptable" behaviour. So
being a criminal is performing an act in unacceptable
circumstances. Going into a house and taking things that
aren't yours is wrong but if your a bailff then it's OK. I
hope that makes sense.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 05:05 [#00399921]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"We are criminal only in relation to
legislation methinks, not having it be part of our, er,
personality"
I think you've hit it spot on there meho.



 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-11 05:07 [#00399923]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I'm popping out to lunch but I'm interested in what you'll
say to this Meho.
Laters


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 05:11 [#00399925]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Have a nice lunch. The point I'm trying to make here is that
saying "There's a criminal lurking in each one of us etc."
actually means nothing as it is not an internal quality, but
wholly external, depending on the circumstances.

Sure, people are most of the time aware of their activities
being legal or not and intentionally performing illegal
activities might be defined as "true" criminal behaviour,
but it's not part of yours or mine nature, it's still part
of the society and it's EVER CHANGING regulations, laws and
legislation.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2002-10-11 05:14 [#00399926]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



i´d flash at all the lovely girls in the world


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-10-11 05:22 [#00399928]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399925 | Show recordbag



My concept of a "criminal" only overlaps that of the law in
some areas. I think there are somethings that would be
"Criminal" even if legalised. Perhaps there should be some
other term for an ammoral person as opposed to someone who
doesn't abide by the law?


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 05:28 [#00399931]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #00399928



I hear you. But that's what I'm saying, we can all have our
own definitions, but the only universal definition ("the
person who breaks the law") does not allow for the "criminal
mind" or mentallity to exist. Thus saying "there's a
criminal lurking in all of us" has as much sense as saying
"we all die once". It's too broad, it means nothing.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-10-11 05:35 [#00399935]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399931 | Show recordbag



Did you know that simply by using the internet (any site)
you are breaking copyright, in legal terms at least? I
wouldn't say this makes you a "criminal" in my sense of the
word.

However, you certainly get some people who are more inclined
towards anti-social acts such as violence, vandalism etc.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 05:38 [#00399940]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00399935



Explain - websites are put up by companies of whom have the
copyright to their information they want you to view, so how
are you infringing their copyrights in law?


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 05:38 [#00399941]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #00399935



Didn't know that fact, care to explain?

And, as I said before, people more inclined to anti-social
behaviour are in one instance criminals: if they actually go
out and break the law, in other they might be policemen or
soldiers. Bill Gates breaks laws, George Bush breaks
international laws, yet they are not labelled criminals
(well, except by liberals, but not by their own societies).


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 05:40 [#00399946]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00399935



Come on boy, explain yourself!

:P


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 05:42 [#00399948]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399941



Hey Meho, I don't think he can!!

Hehehhhehehe ;)


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 05:42 [#00399949]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Or at least expose yourself.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 05:43 [#00399950]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



He was probably just teasing eh? Tho it doesn't sound like
something Ceri would do...


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 05:55 [#00399967]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399950



Hmmmmm...I agree


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 05:59 [#00399975]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399950



Although having said that Meho, maybe the two of us are
infringing Phob's copyright by being here.....yikes!!

*phones for a good lawyer!*

;)


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-10-11 06:05 [#00399984]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Plus I never stop polluting this MB with porn related
content. He will probably ditch his ideas to sue me and send
in death squad instead.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 06:07 [#00399989]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00399984



Run Meho, I've started the engine in the getaway
car.....quick....now's our chance!!

Hehehehehehe


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-10-11 06:07 [#00399990]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Common sense would dictate that if someone puts it on the
web they accept it being viewed by people. This is what
common sense dictates.

However, due to the nature of computers, looking at a
website makes a "copy" of the website to memory (legally
this counts as a copy). Unless a website specifically says
you may make copies of it you are technically
breaking copyright law.

We did a module in uni about this and in most cases the
judge would throw it out, however, if you follow the letter
of the law you are breaking copyright merely by using the
net (although not teletext amusingly as that is continually

broadcast and no copy is stored).

As I've said before, doing this,

"Although having said that Meho, maybe the two of us are

infringing Phob's copyright by being here.....yikes!!

*phones for a good lawyer!*

;) "
Is breaking Chris' copyright as whilst he accepted
posting it, he didn't sign a disclaimer saying the copyright
on posts was forfited.



 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 06:10 [#00399992]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I wasn't gonna leave the signed disclaimer here for everyone
to see, Meho has it!


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-10-11 06:11 [#00399995]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I still don't buy your excuse....hehehehehhee!

Do think that chip shops infringe copyright by wrapping
chips in yesterdays news?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-10-11 06:13 [#00399997]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00399992 | Show recordbag



It was really funny when our lecturer told us about it,
everyone was shouting how stupid it was.

It's like scratching a record in a track, technically you
should pay a small amount of royalties as you are using
their original in a "derivative work". Bloody stupid...


 


Messageboard index