everything looks good on... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
big
...and 411 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614224
Today 6
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
everything looks good on...
 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-09-10 12:15 [#00386722]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



...Mac OS X!
ecpecially normal text in internet explorer!
uhmmm...the softness :)

 

offline uzim on 2002-09-10 12:20 [#00386730]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



so much more beautiful than that windows me/xp/whatever
shit... :)


 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-09-10 12:23 [#00386733]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



the internet explorer for mac hasnt got all the PC-features
and "fastness", but the OS X overall functions are great.
Did you hear the rumor about X 10.3 will be PC compatible -
meaning you can run it on a PC, with the freeBSD kernel


 

offline uzim on 2002-09-10 12:31 [#00386742]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



hmm... don't know if it's a good idea for apple to do
this... -_-

what i love in osX is the stability, and the dock (i
couldn't live without it now!!)...

too bad all previous apps need classic to work (especially
windows media player since the osX installer don't work!
fucking microsoft)... and i also miss the fact that when you
were downloading a pic from the internet on your computer
with os9, you could have the url of the pic simply by
reading the informations on it... not anymore on osX.


 

offline dmise from Melbourne (Australia) on 2002-09-10 12:32 [#00386745]
Points: 635 Status: Lurker | Followup to Junktion: #00386733



Apple are keeping an x86 version of macOS10 going because
motorolla who currently makes the CPU's for Apple is been
slow at releasing new CPU's and Apple is keeping there
options open cause they may in the future have to use Intel
or AMD CPU's.


 

offline urb from Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-09-10 12:37 [#00386754]
Points: 568 Status: Regular



We've got one of those iLamp's at work and it's pretty
pretty, but I prefer even Windows to osX. Everything is too
user-friendly in osX.


 

offline phiz from Liverpool (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-10 12:50 [#00386771]
Points: 2622 Status: Lurker



Gates finally got his hands on Apple didnt he, the twat.

cant upgrade to X till the rest of the company is
compatible, wasn't there bugs in X, thats why X.1 come out
straight after?


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-09-10 16:48 [#00386952]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



Yeah, the original OS X was slow as shit, and it had a lot
of bugs. Things got MUCH better with 10.1, and it's pretty
much perfect with 10.2 (jaguar).

i have to agree about OSX making everything lusciously
pretty on the web.


 

offline novocain143 from New York / long island (United States) on 2002-09-10 17:17 [#00386978]
Points: 70 Status: Regular



they ruined the excitment in getting a new comp. with XP

 

offline broken phillip on 2002-09-10 17:31 [#00386992]
Points: 828 Status: Lurker | Followup to uzim: #00386742



is that a pic of lain for your avatar uzim??

 

offline broken phillip on 2002-09-10 17:33 [#00386996]
Points: 828 Status: Lurker | Followup to dmise: #00386745



and lol demise.. is that a pic of that dude from degrassi
high??

what was the name of his band ?? the zit somethings??

 

Messageboard index