CD-R discs unreadable in less than two years | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 577 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
CD-R discs unreadable in less than two years
 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 04:34 [#00829185]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular



CD-Recordable discs unreadable in less than two
years


(from CDfreaks)

The Dutch PC-Active magazine has done an extensive CD-R
quality test. For the test the magazine has taken a look at
the readability of discs, thirty different CD-R brands, that
were recorded twenty months ago. The results were quite
shocking as a lot of the discs simply couldn't be read
anymore.

Roughly translated from Dutch:

The tests showed that a number of CD-Rs had become
completely unreadable while others could only be read back
partially. Data that was recorded 20 months ago had become
unreadable. These included discs of well known and lesser
known manufacturers.

It is presumed that CD-Rs are good for at least 10 years.
Some manufacturers even claim that their CD-Rs will last up
to a century. From our tests it's concluded however that
there is a lot of junk on the market. We came across CD-Rs
that should never have been released to the market. It's
completely unacceptable that CD-Rs become unusable in less
than two years.


Original Article in Dutch PC-Active.

---

[about the attached picture]

On the image you can see the exact same CD-R. On the left
you see the outcome of our tests done in 2001. On the right
you see the same CD-R in 2003. The colours indicate the
severeness of the errors in the following order; white,
green, yellow and red whereas white indicates that the disc
can be read well and red indicates that it cannot be
read.

--
discuss


Attached picture

 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-08-20 04:35 [#00829188]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular



Er....blimey....!


 

offline Co-existence from Bergen (Norway) on 2003-08-20 04:59 [#00829225]
Points: 3388 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #00829185



Intrsting! Do the article drop any names of cd-r brands one
should avoid?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-08-20 05:00 [#00829228]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



I only had my old acid tracks on CD-r (including the 'kill
your parents' one) and they read fine after more 2 years of
non-usage.


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-20 05:02 [#00829229]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



Just burn new ones, innit! Even if you had to burn one every
year, it would take 28 years to finally cost the same as an
album. Over here, anyway.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 05:08 [#00829237]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Co-existence: #00829225



nope...


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2003-08-20 05:08 [#00829238]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



Thats bullshit I have CDRS that are more then 3-4 even 5
years old. I think you just have to burn them slow and KEEP
THEM IN THEIR CASES.

Remember when CDRs were like 12 bucks each ? hahaha


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 05:09 [#00829240]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Jarworski: #00829229



When you purchase an album you're paying for the music [on
the cd] - the cd [itself] is just a way of getting the music
home to you.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 05:10 [#00829242]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to oxygenfad: #00829238



damn? it's not bullshit... you didn't read the article? it
doesn't say ALL CD-Rs last less than two years, it saids
some of the ones they tested did.
and that's upsetting, if the manufacturer claim they will
last longer.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 05:14 [#00829246]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to oxygenfad: #00829238



I once bought a CD-R for I think $12 bucks.... but I didn't
burn it until years later and by then they were like $3 or
so...
bah... it was a friend of mine who told me he could burn
some stuff for me (I asked him), but he never did... the
little bastard.


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2003-08-20 18:19 [#00830315]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular



it's clearly true, you see it when you buy lots of cdr's
(then you maybe buying cheap ones)
did you know that a croissant number of electronic equipment
manufacturers make their products so that they'll be dead in
7-10 years...
talk about fidelity, i have a korg ms-20 24 years old, still
has all the original pieces, you can't cheaply buy long
lasting gear like that now


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 18:36 [#00830336]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I've got Pico CD-Rs (er something like that). They don't
even have a label on them.


 

offline jingle from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-20 18:51 [#00830356]
Points: 502 Status: Regular



my old computer case was made from the same type of steel as
a shotgun barrel, my shelves dropped on it and didn't even
dent

cd-rs aren't as good as they say- i usually burn 2 copies of
important stuff and make a zip file on drive. i'm that
paranoid


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2003-08-20 18:55 [#00830365]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



I want an MS 20 : (((((((((((((((( !!!!!!!


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-08-20 20:16 [#00830414]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



yes there are some cdr brands that are absolute crap. for
instance, staples cdrs are complete horseshit. they won't
even play on some readers.

however, i do believe how long your cdr's last also depends
on how you maintain them. i keep mine stowed away, so no
problem here. but i'll probably just turn all 100something
cd of music i've made into mp3s on my comp someday...


 


Messageboard index