|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2009-06-27 13:29 [#02300730]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
Well that's disappointing. I really need to buy an operating system (mine is hacked), and M$ is having a sale on the upgrade for win 7. For a limited time, it will apparently be only $50. For once, I really had my hopes up about a Microsoft product, especially since a friend of mine has been using the win7 beta on his netbook and seems to think it's good. This puts me in a shitty position because I don't want to spend money on a legit copy of vista when it's just going to be completely abandoned by Micro$haft, nor do I want some shitty mac OS clone taskbar that is less usable than vista.
|
|
obara
from Utrecht on 2009-06-27 13:32 [#02300731]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular
|
|
i'm waiting for windows 8
|
|
MetallicaDude
from the stazhole on 2009-06-27 13:33 [#02300732]
Points: 3644 Status: Regular
|
|
i dont get windows 7. didnt they already do version 95. why would they go backwards
|
|
MetallicaDude
from the stazhole on 2009-06-27 13:43 [#02300740]
Points: 3644 Status: Regular
|
|
i have xp now but im never gonna put windows on a computer again after this. my hd is dying and once it goes for good im gonna put ubuntu on a new 1. ive tryed vista and its dumb as shit
|
|
MetallicaDude
from the stazhole on 2009-06-27 14:04 [#02300747]
Points: 3644 Status: Regular
|
|
xp is the best windows though
|
|
b6662966
from ? on 2009-06-27 14:15 [#02300754]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker | Followup to : #02300752
|
|
Youre not seriously trying to tell us that win2000 is better than winXP, are you? If so, you lose all tech credibility.
Secondly, because Windows 7's taskbar doesnt have a single vague feature that "YOU" feel it needs, it somehow becomes a failure?
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2009-06-27 14:21 [#02300758]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
i started reading the blog and then i was like wait this is a blog about a feature of an operating system and i closed it so hard
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2009-06-27 14:22 [#02300759]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker | Followup to b6662966: #02300754
|
|
i downgraded from xp to 98
|
|
cx
from Norway on 2009-06-27 14:44 [#02300760]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular
|
|
i was entertained by the 'give me the last freaking window' jpeg.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2009-06-28 00:05 [#02300818]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to roygbivcore: #02300758 | Show recordbag
|
|
yeah man reading blogs about software is like, TOTALLY NOT HIP TO THE MAX. LOZLZLLDLDS
|
|
xceque
on 2009-06-28 04:11 [#02300847]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
One important question: can you still turn off all these dumb features and Play School skins and have it look like Windows 2000 again?
I don't mind improvements, but visual candy that takes up unnecessary space on an already too-small screen is shit. Shit shit shit shit shit.
Can you make the taskbar the same height it was in Win2000? Can you have the start menu back to 2000 style? Even if you can do this, people are just going to write apps looking like the default skin. I already see apps now that look like Vista. Windows is just going to look a mess. Shit shit shit shit shit.
(Sidenote - "flashy" linux flavours and OSX already look this way, so they're out right from the start)
|
|
xceque
on 2009-06-28 05:55 [#02300864]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Excellent. Now can you do all that and turn off the word "Start" on the start button?
|
|
dave_g
from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 06:43 [#02300869]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker
|
|
Grouping of similar windows is a horrible feature. I use classic taskbar, two rows. Top is for open windows, bottom is for quick launch icons. Turn off desktop icons, have a pretty background picture.
On my linux box, using gnome I have something similar.
Hopefully this is possible on windows 7 too.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2009-06-28 07:01 [#02300871]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
yea grouping is bad
|
|
Steinvordhosbn
from London (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-28 07:41 [#02300883]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Followup to MetallicaDude: #02300732 | Show recordbag
|
|
With the Y2K bug Windows reset after 2000.
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2009-06-28 12:16 [#02300969]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to : #02300960
|
|
i'm curious why microsoft changes certain function in explorer which people got used to over the last few years.
i installed vista today and the first thing that i realised was that there is no "up" button in explorer. that's absolutely ridiculous. it just slows down the workflow significantly.
next is the control panel. what was wrong with "add/delete programs".
a lot of inconvenient stuff going on. i guess i'll wait until i will be really forced to use vista or 7 or whatever.
|
|
Messageboard index
|