dawkins was wrong | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 132 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614201
Today 5
Topics 127548
  
 
Messageboard index
dawkins was wrong
 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-09-21 20:22 [#02122872]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



you're pretty smart, wimwuh, i wish you were a human so we
could be friends.


 

offline cx from Norway on 2007-09-22 00:05 [#02122908]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



hey razor guy, neither science nor religion is to blame for
anything, it is us, humanity, as a conscious self aware race
that is to blame for all the atrocities in the world.
sure technology enables us to make weapons, but those
weapons arent going to shoot themselves, it is ultimately a
humans conscious choice that does all the damage.



 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2007-09-22 00:23 [#02122909]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I think if I just lost my Mom I would be grappling with
atheism and hoping there's more too, Cygnus. I hope you see
your mom again someday.


 

offline misantroll from Switzerland on 2007-09-22 00:25 [#02122910]
Points: 2151 Status: Lurker



your mom is so big you got triangukar doors


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-09-22 03:46 [#02122929]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



People who seem to create an invisible force field between
science and religion, dividing the two are quite dim. Both
require faith, both change their views over the years, both
have different "sects" who hold different beliefs about the
same thing. Both have parts of them which are not verifiable
with any certainty and the most we know about them
effectively amounts only to belief. The idea of religion as
some cloudy, abstract ying to science's solid and verifiable
yang is incorrect. And this fairly recent idea of aetheism
as a "religion"; don't get me started on the idiocy,
hypocrisy and irony of that...


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-09-22 03:52 [#02122930]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



"religion AND science" simply cannot co-exist, and
attempting to do so would result in a fanatic failure.
To be blunt, the most atrocious scientific creations such as
nuclear weapons are used in the name of religion (usually
religions that hate science all together.)
And still to this day these sects of faith banish some of
science's most amazing medical creations.
Therefore I wouldn't say "religion AND science", I wouldn't
even say science. I'd just say religion.
And if you don't agree, then I guess I'll have to play with
the kids over there.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2007-09-22 03:56 [#02122932]
Points: 12430 Status: Regular



You're all making me cry.


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2007-09-22 04:25 [#02122935]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i would find it immensely impressive if any sane, rational
being were able to be unaffected by what dawkins says here:

god delusion 1 of 2

link to part 2 on same page.

i used to be very sceptic about his 'extreme atheism' but
watching this has indeed won me over from the agnostic to
the atheist side.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-09-22 06:22 [#02122981]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular







Attached picture

 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2007-09-22 06:51 [#02122990]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



may i quote Alexander Pope

Drink it deep or touch not the Pyrenean Spring, a little
knowledge is a dangerous thing.



 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2007-09-22 07:01 [#02122992]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02122990 | Show recordbag



i am now thinking that it was definitely a mistake putting
science as an opposer to religion

i have seen an adverse reaction

many 'religious' people i know (and of) see dawkins as an
enemy. and now science and 'intellectualism' is armed up a
ready to fight also.

He who fights too long against dragons, becomes a dragon
himself. (Fredrick Nietzsche)



 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-09-22 07:33 [#02122998]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



Scientific/technological process could be 'bad' but isn't
necessarily the same topic as religion. Read about the
luddites or Ted Kaczynski's 'unabomber manifesto'. He sees
scientific work and acquiring knowledge as an ill surrogate
behavior replacement for things we evolved to do like
hunt/gather or whatever. Technology makes us live in an
environment our slow evolving genes aren't adapted to and is
maybe more stressful. Then again, what else would we alter
our environment into except something that we prefer (since
humans are the ones with the power to alter it like
inventing the car etc). We now don't worry about predators
and have comfy shelters/etc. If we had a chance to
experience the life of hunter gatherers we might prefer it.
But progress is probably unavoidable; its an arms race and
if you don't take advantage of some technology someone else
will leaving you at a disadvantage. Nice dragon quote.


 


Messageboard index