american presidential rhttp://xltronic.com/mb/msg_rec.php3?newtopic=1ace 2008 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 293 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
american presidential rhttp://xltronic.com/mb/msg_rec.php3?newtopic=1ace 2008
 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2007-02-11 11:26 [#02048734]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02048705



Now you've backed off from your original position by using
the word "necessarily". Good enough for me.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2007-02-11 13:11 [#02048785]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02048572



Sorry if I misread you buddy..

I'll readily agree that the Republicans have definitely
abused their power, perhaps even to the extent of calling
them 'evil' at times. Still, I find that some lefties like
Hillary are equally power hungry and have more ulterior
motives than we'll ever know. You seem to be more middle of
the road than I first thought, and honestly I think thats
the only reasonable position at this moment in time. I just
wonder about folks who shack up with the Democrats simply
because of the currupt right.. when I suspect the corruption
flows both ways.


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-02-11 13:40 [#02048807]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



tru


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-02-11 13:41 [#02048809]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #02048734 | Show recordbag



My original position was, and still is, that it being a
woman or a man won't make any difference outside of it being
two different persons. In other words, even though part of
the difference between a woman and a man is that they are
indeed different in being a woman vs being a man, but the
main difference still consists in each one's separate
history (which isn't unrelated to them being male or female,
but there also isn't a necessary set path of development
related to any sex/gender). It is also that the difference
in this context most likely won't bee too big, which is a
bad thing.


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-02-11 13:43 [#02048812]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



oh! i didnt know you were voting in the usa?


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-02-11 13:44 [#02048815]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



shit like this matters in the usa, unfortunately.


 

offline OK on 2007-02-11 13:57 [#02048825]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



AMERICAN, WOULD YOU PUT A TERRORIST IN POWER? DONT VOTE FOR
Barack HUSSEIN OSAMA.

AMERICAN, THIS COUNTRY NEEDS TO BE TOUGH. THESE ARE TOUGH
TIMES. WOULD YOU PUT A WOMAN IN CHARGE? VOTE BUSH/RICE


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-02-11 13:58 [#02048826]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



hey thats right, guy. keep the cowboys comin.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-02-11 14:02 [#02048829]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to OK: #02048825



LOLZ


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-02-11 14:05 [#02048831]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



american empire


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2007-02-11 14:12 [#02048834]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Bush has done a pretty good job, though. It's a shame Cheney
isn't running for President.


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-02-11 14:14 [#02048836]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



AMEN BROTHER GOD BLESS YOU


 

offline OK on 2007-02-11 17:50 [#02048911]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



OBAMA [picture of obama]

OSAMA [pic of osama bin laden]

coincidence? of course not. Vote Bush-Rice


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2007-02-11 17:57 [#02048916]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



Ok, you are right. That will be the slogans. They will pound
it into people's minds and create doubt. Same old tricks


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2007-02-11 18:56 [#02048955]
Points: 408 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02048648



Doesn't matter... Can we trust a woman to engage in
relations with a nation that doesn't respect women?


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2007-02-11 19:10 [#02048959]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



What if those nations started dating other nations? Then
she'd get jealous


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-02-11 22:00 [#02048984]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



we'll be at war with iran before any of this matters


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-02-11 22:43 [#02048991]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



if no one joined the army, there would be no wars.


 

offline B123 from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-02-11 22:49 [#02048992]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker



its certainly going to be one of the most intresting
elections in my lifetime.


 

offline OK on 2007-02-12 00:24 [#02049001]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #02048991



war is a constant in human history?


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-02-12 13:57 [#02049260]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



gotta keep that ol military industrial complex goin strong


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2007-02-12 14:08 [#02049267]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Barack Obama said on CNN that he'd cut troops in Iraq in
half, as and when he'd be elected. A morale-boosting magic
show is just what they need.


The republicans now promise to cut the troop level by
two-thirds by use of friendly fire. You can't possibly be
losing a war if you kill more of your own forces than the
enemy does.

Republicans 1 - Democrats 0


 

offline SCHIZOPHRENIC from Los Angeles (United States) on 2007-02-18 20:01 [#02051935]
Points: 134 Status: Lurker



Hillary Clinton eats babies!


 


Messageboard index