your attitude towards politicians | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 306 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
your attitude towards politicians
 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-09-20 13:52 [#01974637]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



the hungarians dont seem to think much of their politicians
at the moment


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-09-20 13:53 [#01974638]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



british politics sux these days. the big 3 parties are all
so pointlessly vague with really transient policies. no one
votes for the decent little ones because they vote
tactically because they are scared one of the big 3 they
dislike will get in - even though they are al the fucking
same these days


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-09-20 14:24 [#01974667]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Anyone that wants that much power has to be fucked up. So by
default, politicians are bad.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-09-20 14:27 [#01974671]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to swears: #01974667



what about Lenin? he was pure and selfless.


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-09-20 14:32 [#01974673]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01974671



He was a meglomaniac like all the other soviets, Karl Marx
thought the Russians were backwards crackpots anyway. The
closest any country came to Marx's vision was Britain before
1979, then the workers were really calling the shots.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-09-20 14:34 [#01974674]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to swears: #01974673



aaahhhhh, those were the days!



 

offline staz on 2006-09-20 15:17 [#01974701]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



i don't see the point of voting blank whatsoever


 

offline staz on 2006-09-20 15:18 [#01974702]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to staz: #01974701



compared to not voting, that is. it all goes into a "don't
bother" stat.


 

offline OK on 2006-09-20 15:45 [#01974710]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



it's stupid cus politics became a career, so the focus is to
win the game of politics. and that's psawns all the
consecuences you mentioned because of the need to spek
politically correctly and stuff


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-09-20 15:48 [#01974712]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to staz: #01974702 | Show recordbag



I wouldn't say so.. at least not for me.

if you don't vote, that says you don't care

if you vote blank that says you don't care much for any of
the current electable parties. I also don't see myself
voting blank in the near future with frp being so big.. I'll
vote for their biggest enemy on the left side. it'll
probably be ap or sv. however, this doesn't mean I vote FOR
ap or sv, it means I vote AGAINST frp (there should be some
option to vote "NO!" to a party instead of all choices being
positive "YES!"es).


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-09-20 23:54 [#01974834]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01974443



Seconded. I also vote for the one in the far left (not
because I'm leftie).
See? We can agree in the trascendental things!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-09-21 02:36 [#01974855]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to staz: #01974702 | Show recordbag



In our country, spoilt or "non" votes are recorded
(seperately from people who didn't turn up). The political
motivation it shows is that you're not, as politicians would
like to believe, too lazy to go. Large numbers of spoilt
ballots would concern them as it would demonstrate that if
there was a new party (or an existing party changed their
policies) to represent most people in the UK, they'd be
fucked. I don't know what it's like abroad, but with Labour
getting 40% of voters (and that's just the ones who bothered
to turn up) being called a "landslide", it would suggest
that the vast majority of people in the country are being
ruled by a party that they don't want, which seems a pretty
odd form of democracy.


 


Messageboard index