Vote to Legalize Pot! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 597 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Vote to Legalize Pot!
 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-10-31 21:29 [#01766695]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



i am pleased to see that i stirred something up

im just gonna sit back and smoke my post work bowl and dig
the discussion, savvy


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-10-31 21:32 [#01766696]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to mimi: #01766690



yeah, it probably wouldn't stop them from drinking. weed
usually calms people down, although im not sure whats the
effect on drunk people..


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-10-31 21:34 [#01766697]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to death-pengwin: #01766695



tune into the cut for smoke


 

offline mimi on 2005-10-31 21:41 [#01766701]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01766696



oh whoops, that was meant to be a follow-up to r40f, anyway
:)


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-10-31 21:44 [#01766702]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



Highlights from Marijuana Myths, Marijuana Facts nice and informitive site

a VAULT/library of cannabis info

Study Shows Long Term Marijuana Users Healthy Mr David Reilly, chief investigator for the
study, said the average profile for the interviewees was of
regular marijuana use from the age of 17, lasting for 19
years. Some 94 per cent smoked it at least twice a week, and
60 per cent smoked it daily, with a typical quantity being
two joints a day of the potent flowering heads of female
plants.

"We have nothing startling. We don't see any evidence of
high psychological disturbance among the people, we see very
little evidence of health problems except for respitory
problems," said Mr Reilly

Heavy Long-Term Marijuana Use Does Not Impair Lung Functi...
April 3, 1997, Los Angeles, CA: Habitual marijuana smokers
do not experience a greater annual rate of decline in lung
function than nonsmokers, according to the latest findings
by researchers at the University of California at Los
Angeles (UCLA) School of Medicine. The results of the
eight-year study appear in Volume 155 of the American
Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. Dr. Donald
P. Tashkin, who headed the study, is one of America's
foremost experts on marijuana smoking and lung function.



 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-10-31 21:52 [#01766706]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



i personnally feel that pot is a safer drug than aspirin or
beer because you can not OD or get killed by it in any
normal circumstance.

now, i smoke pot because i feel it is an enhancer. i know
there is a few members here who have had girlfriends, heck!
they may have a girlfriend now!... anyways, you know what it
is like have to watch some hienous disney movie. with pot,
suddenly lilo and stitch isn't so horrible and can be quite
amusing at times...... but without reefer that movie so
terrible.

i just chill out at home with my girlfriend and we smoke
pot.
dig, no one gets hurts. its a habit thats cheap to afford
compared to drinking.
for example. 120 bucks (Canadian) will get me Friday and
Saturday wasted, whereas the same amount will get me a half
ounce of weed and last over two and a half weeks.

and thats why i dont drink anymore


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-10-31 21:54 [#01766707]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



dont forget to vote for legalization


 

offline mimi on 2005-10-31 21:58 [#01766708]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



hrmm, or you could just pick out a better movie...

seriously though i have no qualms about legalizing marijuana
at all. and i am surprised that there is even much of a
fuss over it, especially in a society that is as drug
saturated as the united states is already. drug companies
have so much sway in our government that it is not even
funny. in recent years many horribly dangerous drugs have
been prescribed to children and nobody seems to show any
remorse but when it comes to legalizing marijuana, something
that seems just so harmless, people become very uptight all
of the sudden.

i just think that some of the arguments that some people use
for and against legalization are ridiculous.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-10-31 22:03 [#01766710]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #01766708



well said and i agree.


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-10-31 22:08 [#01766713]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



the government would make a few hundred billion a year if
they legalized, taxed, educated, private and corporate
licienced, and kept it reasonably regulated and taxed.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-10-31 22:20 [#01766718]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to death-pengwin: #01766713



write up a proposal and give it to your local
representative. the more you can include about money and
the government making money, the better.

in the meantime, i will rudely scoff at your claim of "a few
hundred billion a year" and chalk it up to the pot smoke
choking your brain of its last few cells.


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-10-31 22:24 [#01766722]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



sure they could make billio
for example

at mccleans site they say bc producers make 2 billion a
year
we have, what, like 13 provinces... so you do the math


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-10-31 22:32 [#01766731]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to death-pengwin: #01766722



ok, 2 x 13 = 26 (billion). where's the other $274 billion?

not to mention, those figures are completely meaningless
when you are talking about projected tax money as opposed to
the current illegal drug economy.


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-10-31 22:36 [#01766732]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



ah i see, my math seems to be particulary bad tonight!
true dat on the other point

but in my eyes i could see the government making quite a bit
more than the illegal producers even if the same amount of
people smoked pot


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-11-01 09:54 [#01766988]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



well people, there's still time to vote for legalization!
we are only at sixty two percent

cooome ON!!!


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-11-01 09:57 [#01766991]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to death-pengwin: #01766988



it's not a real vote, why do you care?


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-11-01 10:03 [#01766992]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



im an obsessive freak
if you read any of my posts in this yinder post you would
have came to the quick conclusion of " this man is reefer
mad!! "
so in short and short your inquiry is now thusly solved!


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-11-01 10:04 [#01766993]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



cannabis will never be legalized in the united states. i'm
probably more convinced of this fact than anything else i
can think of.

this is why i'm not voting; it serves no purpose
whatsoever.

otherwise i generally favor legalization.

if anyone cares...


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-11-01 10:07 [#01766996]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



yeah, in the usa they are still "at war" with pot

here in canada the worst that will happen is you lose your
stash!
and the general mentality of canadian society has been
loosening up over the last decade by leaps and bounds.
for example, a few years ago our prime minister put the
papers through for decriminalization, and it was big news,
but not in the bad way


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-11-01 11:55 [#01767131]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i just drank my first ever cup of pot coffee. it tasted
awful and i'm waiting for something to happen.



 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-11-01 13:09 [#01767204]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



thats fucking wicked!!
i've never a had a body high, but its supposed to be way
better than a normal high
let me know how it goes


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-11-01 14:21 [#01767260]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



61% Say Legalize!
what do you say?


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-11-01 14:37 [#01767270]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



Pass the weed, Dad
this is such a wicked article!!
i love mccleans! they present both sides in a very unbiased
form.
i recommend a read yall!


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-11-01 14:38 [#01767273]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to death-pengwin: #01767260



I say: shut up, you insane pothead.


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-11-01 14:40 [#01767275]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



thats not very nice, im not insane, im eccentric!


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-11-01 15:07 [#01767286]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



my congressman told me smoking weed causes crime, so i'm
voting "no."


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2005-11-01 15:28 [#01767309]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



some pothead(s) stole my weed last week..a whole fucking
plant nicely grown by my mum, cut and dry....aaargh: there
goes a whole year off free smoking....I hate the fact that
smoking pot increases crime by a few people..mostly addicts
btw....but still I say: Legalize it!


 

offline BoxBob-K23 from Finland on 2005-11-01 16:00 [#01767320]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular



Now, this is just an opinion, but it happens to be the
truth:

1) Nobody should be forced to do anything, or NOT to do
anything, in any way in any relation to anything, 2) unless
his behaviour would otherwise impinge on others' liberties.
(So murder is still unlawful for a reason. Too bad war
isn't.)

As far as the "legalization" matter goes--- It's ridiculous,
people are not answerable to anybody except themselves in
what they do in relation to themselves, and legalization
simply means leveling the playfield, cancelling the harm
that was in the arbitrary bureaucratic choice in favour of
some "policy" (i.e. personal opinion of a bully).

Legalization is not a privilege, it's simply an apriori
right, at least if human rights are of any concern.

Just to be clear here, I think there is no argument that
would justify outlawing any drug or substance or guns or
jaywalking or anything. A stupid law is a stupid law is a
stupid law.

It's all hypocritical unless we in the same stroke legalize
heroin, opium, coca, datura, magic mushrooms, all sorts of
99% home-tilled alcoholic beverages, angel dust, rat poison,
you name it. I'm all for it. And I'm tired of these "but MJ
is not so terrible, it should be declassified as a hard
drug" arguments, since this implies you'd be happy just with
a partial liberalization. I wouldn't.

Or maybe I would, but I wouldn't be free. And that's the
point.
People aren't imbeciles unless they're treated as such.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-11-02 07:05 [#01767612]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #01767286



i mean, i'm voting "no" when my congressman comes up for
re-election.

convictions cause convicts.


 

offline death-pengwin from Medicine Hat (Canada) on 2005-11-02 10:17 [#01767823]
Points: 601 Status: Lurker



wacky yankees


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2005-11-02 11:53 [#01767920]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



I hope pot is never legalised. It would please far too many
pricks who wear jester hats, listen to The Levellers and
make paper-mache effigies of George W Bush to take to
anti-globalisation marches with their stinking hippy
friends.
I prefer cocaine.


 


Messageboard index