Meat really is murder | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 593 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614124
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Meat really is murder
 

offline Taffmonster from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-10-15 08:23 [#01750557]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker



i havent read all the gumpf in the thread mainly cos i just
woke up, but i know i cant justify eating meat in anyway
other than me liking it. but i do think its good to know
where it comes from.
me not eating meat would not save any animals any cruelty,
its merely more myself washing my hands of it all, it would
take everyone not eating meat to stop that and we all know
none of us are brave enough to try that, because one of us
might stop but then someone else might not and we dont trust
other people so why risk it hehe

anyhow i was veggie for a bit untill i realised i cant live
without sausage rolls



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-15 08:24 [#01750558]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01750552 | Show recordbag



hahah

oh, well.. his conclusion was unconclusive anyway... people
live perfectly well both with and without meat.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-15 08:27 [#01750564]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to esaruoho: #01750548 | Show recordbag



still not accounting for the qualitative part of it.

and people who eat meat don't disagree that animals should
be handled in a humane way, but the solution to that, as
someone probably has already said in the thread, isn't
necessarily not eating meat, but rather choosing which meat
to eat; from which.. meat company one buys ones meat and
boycotting the "bad" companies.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-15 08:28 [#01750565]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01750564 | Show recordbag



= making an informed choice as to which meat one should
eat.

that will also be the title of my latest track.


 

offline staz on 2005-10-15 08:31 [#01750571]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01750552



Not saying that. Jesus, you're free to worship THE GOD OF
RAPE for all I care. Just the fact that there's a lot of
energy being put into propaganda and misinformation from
organizations like PETA pisses me off. Also, soya tastes
like shit!


 

offline staz on 2005-10-15 08:32 [#01750572]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01750564



Yeah, ecological meat is sound!


 

offline esaruoho from helsinki (Finland) on 2005-10-15 09:37 [#01750627]
Points: 577 Status: Regular



who wants ecological meat when you could have economical
meat..
.. right , right? screw taste hand me the change..



 

offline staz on 2005-10-15 09:40 [#01750632]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



Dunk my heart in a vat of lard
It's gettin' all crispy and it's gettin' all hard
Deep-fried love . . . come on, give me the grease!
Shove that hamburger down your throat
Pass the ketchup, I can, I won't, I don't


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-10-15 09:46 [#01750636]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



I am going to force my pro meat agenda down the throats of
citizens! :D!!!

Annual BBQ's!


 

online big from lsg on 2005-10-15 09:48 [#01750638]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



(im a veggie)
i'd never be arsed to buy biologically made meat, i think
it's the government's responsibility to fight travesties
like these. im a consumer, i want to buy things cheap; my
piece of meat 2 euro more expensive, i wouldnt even notice
the difference, maybe buy smaller pieces. biological farmers
in holland just didnt make enough money because the consumer
will keep going for the least expensive meat.



 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-15 09:52 [#01750643]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



I actually agrree, meat is murrderr. I'll still eat it
though. I just choose not to think about it, and my
conscience is prretty ok with it.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-15 10:08 [#01750661]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



My dad worrked in a slaughterrhouse when he was youngerr, he
didn't like it.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-10-15 10:10 [#01750665]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to staz: #01750571



Soya probably tastes awright when you're starving to death.

Let's get a few things straight, i don't for one minute
think that vegetarianism should be some militant crusade, or
that it's going to change the world one iota, and i can't
fucking stand "heartwrenching" voiceovers like that baldwin
knob's. PETA-style emotional manipulation irks me.

But.

That doesn't change my opinion of the meat industry. Even
cutting out the emotional angle, it wastes a lot of land,
it's most often non-union and grossly underpaid, the safety
regulations in place are a bureaucratic, unpoliceable mess
(that's job safety AND product safety, tasty reconstituted
cowshit in your pie etc)... meh, it's still up to you. I
don't give a fuck what you eat.


 

offline staz on 2005-10-15 10:21 [#01750677]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01750665



Yeah, but I think us humans waste the planet enough already
so it's already a lost cause for me!


 

offline Moot from Antarctica on 2005-10-15 10:45 [#01750692]
Points: 169 Status: Lurker



Of all sexual perversions, the strangest is chastity.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-15 10:52 [#01750698]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



linguistic evidence:

mmmmmmmmmmmmeat

ssssssssssssssalad

which one sounds more like a snake?


 

offline recaps from keys on 2005-10-15 11:53 [#01750724]
Points: 177 Status: Lurker



I have been a vegetarian my hole life and as a result been
healthy and less sick than other meat-eating people in my
surroundings.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2005-10-15 12:05 [#01750732]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



You'll have to pry the sushi from my cold dead hands.

PS: nuke the world


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-15 12:48 [#01750756]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



tell you what : we can argue,chat, agree and disagree. and
at the end of a day im going to eat meat, you are going to
eat veggies, the both of us will drink a pint, then go to
bed, and thats pretty much it. so whats the problem.


 

offline conner_bw from Montreal, QC, Canada (Canada) on 2005-10-15 13:49 [#01750789]
Points: 54 Status: Lurker



Vegan since 1993.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-10-15 13:50 [#01750792]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



I am going to increase meat intake to make up for you
veggies. :D lol


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2005-10-15 13:54 [#01750798]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to K300i: #01750756



the problem is that I'M RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG!!!!!!


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-15 13:57 [#01750800]
Points: 670 Status: Regular | Followup to conner_bw: #01750789



so, what do you eat on a daily basis ?


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2005-10-15 14:45 [#01750826]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



Vegetarianism is healthier in most regards. This can be
proved by the cancer and heart disease rates in countries
that eat little or no meat. These diseases are the biggest
preventable self-induced causes of death in meat-eating
western societies.
Someone in this thread said that iron is only in meat.
Spinach for example has more iron-per-calorie than most
meat. People say that it is more difficult to get protein
sources for a vegetarian/vegan diet. That's probably true,
simply because of the lesser availability of
meat-alternative foods in countries where meat is consumed
in high amounts. But it is very difficult to get a protein
deficiency. Eating 2000 calories a day of any food will
likely yield enough protein.
The only nutrient that a human needs that's not in plants is
B12. I think that it is crucial to eat some type of animal
products to get B12, or take a supplement, but that one
exception doesn't mean that you need to eat loads of meat
just because of the taste.
People here were trying to point out that humans are
biologically meant to eat meat, because of incisor teeth,
but some vegetarian animals have similar teeth to humans,
chimpanzees for example. Also, the human intestine is a
herbivore type; long and winding with many wrinkles and
crevices to absorb nutrients and pass waste through slowly,
requiring lots of plant fiber to function. Carnivore
intestines on the other hand are short, smooth and
chute-like in order to expel the added toxins of a meat diet
quickly, they also require no fiber to function. Even
omnivores like bears have carnivore intestines.
Your diet is a personal choice, and there advantages and
disadvantages to most diets. There are many moral reasons
to not eat meat, and I can't think of a single one
supporting it. I do think that most vegetarians shouldn't be
zealous and haughty, and should focus their energy on saving
human lives, and abstain from eating meat as a personal
choice, still acknowledging that their diet is part of that
effort.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-10-15 15:00 [#01750837]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



It is precisely because of the fact that humans have been
eating meat for millions of years that we even have the
ability to question the morality of eating meat. You see,
the complex proteins we get from eating meat have allowed
humans to evolve large brains and subsequently the capacity
for rational thought. I find it ironic.


 

offline fungusman from Monster Island on 2005-10-15 15:15 [#01750843]
Points: 381 Status: Lurker



I was a vegetarian for a long time, I stopped because my
dick was getting smaller, and I had no spine. I was too
passive.

I wasn`t eating right so thats why it didnt work


 

offline Seracelsus on 2005-10-15 15:18 [#01750844]
Points: 175 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01750365



i totally agree with you -- it's the distancing that our
lifestyle, culture and media put in between us and certain
realities (for example those of poverty, violence,
mistreatment of women, horrific food production conditions,
dangers of war, etc.) that makes it so easy not to actually
_feel_ something emotionally about it, and to be able to sit
at a laptop and be flippantly sarcastic about it instead.
not that i don't do that sometimes, but it can just be
really hard to actually connect to some of those issues
first-hand if you're in a certain environment. it's pretty
scary to me. :(


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2005-10-15 15:32 [#01750851]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



Evolume:
I would be willing to bet that only some groups
humans have been eating meat consistently for millions of
years. Some cultures, such as Indian, have abstained from
eating meat for most, if not all of their recorded history
and are no less brain power than long-time meat eaters. The
cultures that have been known to eat lots of meat have done
so out of necessity, and it's difficult to attribute mental
traits to the foods one eats. A vegetarian primate can't
really be proven to be more intelligent than a carnivore
wolf. They have evolved different intelligences, and one
isn't necessarily more advanced than the other. But I would
think that the seemingly-always herbivore primates are
closer to having a capacity for rational thought and a sense
of morality than any carnivore animal with a comparable
level of measurable intelligence.
One could make the argument that the development of a
controlled agricultural society developed man's intelligence
more than the practice of hunting/gathering. If a tribe of
Neanderthals bands together to make a society based around
crop cultivation, then they are forced to evolve more
civilized behaviors, rather than relying on primal hunting
instincts. The process of killing an animal and eating it
seems to be a much easier concept for a primitive person to
grasp than the process of planting crops, tending to them
and cultivating.. not even taking into account the gradual
social and mental adaptations that these early humans needed
to make for such a change in group behavior.


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2005-10-15 15:37 [#01750856]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



i forgot to point out that hunter/gatherer societies were
nomadic, while later agrarian societies obviously stayed in
one place, resulting in cities, more widely-used languages,
economies etc.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2005-10-15 15:38 [#01750859]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



have abstained from eating meat for most, if not all of
their recorded history and are no less brain power than
long-time meat eaters.


notice that evolution occured millions of years before a
concept as "recorded history" was ever even concieved.

I respectfully disagree with this "crop cultivation, then
they are forced to evolve more civilized behaviors" idea.

It goes both ways. I can make points that hunting for
fast/large animals required humans to form more complex
hunting tools and war-like strategies.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-10-15 15:49 [#01750869]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Q4Z2X: #01750851



Good point. I agree with you to some extent, but, I'm
talking here about millions of years of human evolution.
The Indian culture, at least since they stopped eating meat,
is really only measurable in the scale of thousands of
years, a virtual blink of the eye in human evolution. In
other words, Indian recorded history is no where near
the 'millions of years' time scale.

But, yes, I agree that farming allowed cultures to stay put,
and build tight knit societies. Again though, the switch
from nomadic tribes of people to organized cultures happened
in the last several thousands of years. I would argue that
it was only possible because humans had developed the
ability to communicate, think logically and rationally etc
as a result of their meat eating evolution.

whether that necessarily justifies eating meat or not, I
don't know. In my opinion, for the majority of the
evolution of homo sapiens, something like 10-20 million
years, we have been meat eaters (well omnivores which is an
important distinction), and maybe we are just now coming to
a point where it isn't necessary anymore, but I don't think
it is unhealthy in moderation since we are obviously the
product of meat eating evolution.



 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-10-15 15:53 [#01750873]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01750859



yeah, that's what i'm saying.

I am reminded of 2001 space odessy. that first primate that
picked up a bone and used it as a weapon, being the first
primate to use tools and subsequently the first to start
killing and eating animals. This led to innovation in
weapon design (sharp rock on the end of a bone),
communication (getting all you monkey friends to also carry
sharp rocks on bones), hunting strategies (monkey friends
learing to corrale food), warfare (killing off other monkeys
that be stupider) etc.. etc..


 

online big from lsg on 2005-10-15 15:59 [#01750877]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



long posts are wrong


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-10-15 16:01 [#01750878]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #01750877



i want to be one of the thoughest posters. it's a pipe
dream i know.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-10-15 16:02 [#01750880]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01750878



Statistics generated at: October 15, 2005, 2:51 pm (CST)
Messages total 1734175 (509)
Topics total 81445
Messages per topic 21.29
Messages per day 1031.63
Highest day 2004-05-20 2630

Thoughest posters
User Number of characters
tolstoyed 4059787
qrter 3757019
Ophecks 3673751
Ceri JC 3583242
nacmat 3062905
uzim 2860215
virginpusher 2746860
titsworth 2725750
ecnadniarb 2664138
w M w 2454443




 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-15 16:13 [#01750881]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



when i play in computer games i allways have to collect
wood,stones,and food,represented by CHUNKS of MEAT.

i think that creators of pc games know better than all you
silly vegettarians out here,so LETS EAT what nature gave
us.

*bites into raw steak*


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2005-10-15 16:28 [#01750884]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



weatheredstoner:
People who have studied human evolution have found that the
addition of high levels of protein to human's diets resulted
in the latest of evolutionary changes in terms of the human
brain, and the addition of meat helped to develop the
frontal lobe portion of the brain which creates most of the
mental difference between humans and lesser primates.
however, we can't be entirely certain that all humans have
eaten meat for millions of years and that only meat proteins
caused the aforementioned advancements of reason and
morality, simply because we have incisor teeth and currently
eat meat. Certain societies have cultivated protein-rich
plants for longer than recorded history, and who's to say
that these proteins couldn't have evolved their brains to
the extent that animal proteins would/did? For example a
tribe of full-protein soybean-eating people would
theoretically undergo the same mental evolutionary changes
as meat-eaters.
I was mainly disputing Evolume's statement that only eating
meat gave humans the heightened ability to rationalize and
have a sense of morality. I agree that eating meat made
humans evolve a certain way as any change of diet would, but
it is difficult to attribute which type of food did what and
whether an omnivorous or herbivorous diet came first in our
evolutionary devopment. It would seem to me that a
carnivorous diet would result in physical advancements
moreso than mental, which would explain the overall lack of
physical burliness (not intelligence) of certain people who
have been historically known to eat little or no meat. But
it is difficult to know when (or possibly, if) these people
had eaten meat in their evolutionary past.
It would seem that different foods gave different traits,
but it's basically irrelevant now because most have access
to many different types of foods and can choose to have many
different diets of varying healthiness with foods that give
all necessary nutrients/elements.
I'll shut the hell up now.


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2005-10-15 16:37 [#01750887]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



I guess much of what I just said can be applied to evolume's
reply. I'll stop debating because I don't know all that
much about human evolution even given the seemingly largely
speculative nature of it, and I'll end up making a gigantic
ass of myself by making too many uneducated assumptions.


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2005-10-15 16:42 [#01750890]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to manicminer: #01750359



Walking in the woods really is murder.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2005-10-15 16:43 [#01750891]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to Q4Z2X: #01750884



I think morals come from humans wanting to control other
humans, not so much a reflection diet, imo

In any case, eat what your body craves.

Moderation people.


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2005-10-15 16:49 [#01750896]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



Only humans are able to feel bad for their prey. I guess
that's what I meant.. I guess mean a sense of right/wrong
and an abilty to put yourself in someone else's shoes.
I'll shut up now for good.


 

offline tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2005-10-15 16:50 [#01750900]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01750880



You're ahead to titsworth now, few days ago you wasn't,
Goran is at the top though.. :)


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-10-15 16:52 [#01750901]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01750891



whether morals can/should even be applied to animals who are
not moral creatures... that's interesting. is morality a
two-way street? is it just imagined anyway? just a product
of higher evolution as self preservation?

Like, a vegitarian wouldn't eat shark or wolf or pig, but
all of these critters wouldn't think twice about eating a
vegitarian. they might actually prefer to eat the
vegitarian.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-15 17:01 [#01750905]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



blrblrblrklkrb


 

offline Moot from Antarctica on 2005-10-16 04:08 [#01751169]
Points: 169 Status: Lurker



Naked in running shoes, with chainsaw, door to door.
And then I stop for a nice salad to reset my karma.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-16 04:15 [#01751178]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01750878



therre arre 2 ways to achieve that, the Ceri JC and the
qrter way.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2005-10-16 06:20 [#01751219]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



I worked at an abatoir and stopped eating meat soon after, I
just don't want it anymore, I've tried eating it and I just
ended up throwing it back up, and it's all mental.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2005-10-16 06:21 [#01751221]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01750901



"is morality a two-way street? is it just imagined anyway?
just a product of higher evolution as self preservation?"

I think you hit the nail right on the head.



 


Messageboard index