Music Reviewers Annoy Me | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
Bremzen
...and 238 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Music Reviewers Annoy Me
 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-16 10:51 [#02003221]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02003220 | Show recordbag



tip: the red numbers to the right of your location/post
time... click the numbers in the post you are replying to,
and stuff like that will work itself out.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-16 10:56 [#02003223]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I would also like to have an answer to my question about any
implicit meaning or whatever that's supposed to be
"behind" any work of art and how you think you're able to
grasp it.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-11-16 10:57 [#02003224]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



see..if you don't need to know electronic music more
thoroughly, you could as well expand and start writing about
rock albums..you don't need to know anything about it to
write reviews anyway.


 

offline RussellDust on 2006-11-16 11:05 [#02003225]
Points: 16078 Status: Regular | Followup to RussellDust: #02003210



as was this one


 

offline RussellDust on 2006-11-16 11:06 [#02003226]
Points: 16078 Status: Regular | Followup to RussellDust: #02003225



a reply to drunken mastah. i give up.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-11-16 11:28 [#02003229]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



We don't know more about Autechre, we just know what to look
for in Autechre. There are hundreds of artists that you
don't like that millions of people and that isn't because
they are less intelligent than you are. You have no right
to say that these people listen to crap music, because they
don't. And the comparison between Basement Jaxx/ Autechre
was just a comparison between music which was obviously more
accessible than the other.

This thread is very confusing though.


 

offline 1up from greater manchester (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-16 11:59 [#02003251]
Points: 2302 Status: Regular



read vice instead. the reviews are better. the guy can sum
up a whole album in one paragraph.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-11-16 14:01 [#02003327]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02003175



Barcode, what kind of electronic music do you like (besides
basement jaxx, obviously)? It would be nice to know, because
right now the image is drawn you haven't got a clue what
you're talking about and you're criticising music you're not
interested in.


 

offline My_Aphex_Twin from Stockport (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-16 14:06 [#02003330]
Points: 145 Status: Lurker



I never buy a record on what anyone has to say - hearing
is.. er..believing.

John Peel could tickle your earlobes with what he had to
say, though.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2006-11-16 18:52 [#02003430]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02003327



I am interested in all sorts of electronic music, otherwise
why would I write about electronic music and listen to it
constantly?

To say I like Basement Jaxx is a misnoma - I liked a
Basement Jaxx album - their most recent album was only rated
5.1 or something, does that mean that I now hate them? No.

The whole purpose of my contribution to this thread, before
it got convaluted, was that the original post is criticising
reviewers for having an opinion, an opinion that is based on
exactly the same set of principles as their own opinions. So
really, they're simply criticising themselves.

How can criticising an Autechre album mean I am not
interested in it? I was interested enough to listen to it. I
was sent it and listened to it, when I could have been
biased and thrown it in the trash. It would be silly to only
listen to things I think I will like and swerve reviewing
things I don't like. An artist might release ten albums I am
not keen on, and then put out one that I think is brilliant.
How do I know until I've listened to it? I am willing to
revise my opinion at any moment.

I think the problem with a lot of people here - and people
that are glued to web forums in general - is that do not
have an open mind. They see any criticism of an artist they
happen to like as a personal attack on them?!? They feel as
though they need to stick up for the artist, which is
preposterous - as if the artist is interested. And people
also tend to get stuck into little sub-genres, almost
convincing themselves they like everything that's released
simply to sustain their interest in it.

Thankfully, I don't have that problem - I listen to
everything I receive with clean ears - no pre-conceptions.
Can you say the same?


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-11-16 18:59 [#02003433]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



i havent read any of this thread. but A REVIEW IS AN
OPINION.L

obviouisly informed opinions are better, but if you like the
music what does it matter. its all subjective anyway. yeah
if the kind of music you like gets rave reviews all the time
yeah suck your own cock, but if it doesnt and that BOTHJERS
you then maybe you have shit taste in music or a re a
shallow nobby.


 

offline RussellDust on 2006-11-16 19:06 [#02003438]
Points: 16078 Status: Regular



incompetent reviewers are also intitled to their opionion. i
do believe that reviewers and journalist in most fields have
the power to mildly influence record sales, but then people
who read reviews shouldn't take the reviewers' word and
remember that it's unfortunately less and less descriptive
of the music and more and more just an opinion by some
person.


 

offline RussellDust on 2006-11-16 19:07 [#02003439]
Points: 16078 Status: Regular



i can't even write, i shouldn't exist here.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-11-16 19:10 [#02003441]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02003430



"I think the problem with a lot of people here - and people

that are glued to web forums in general - is that do not
have an open mind. They see any criticism of an artist they

happen to like as a personal attack on them?!"

to be fair, this is quite a sad geeky fanboy site. all the
people who post here stand at the back of gigs with their
yellow boards of canada t-shirts, not moving much, but maybe
nod their head to the fucked up beats and lush melodies. i'm
not saying you're right or wrong. well you're right why
would the artist care? i don't know. BUT, a fanboy will
stick up for them anyway, so what did you expect :P i still
havent listened to untitled, i couldnt get past draft 7.30,
which was like rice pudding poo. and bassment jaxx are just
reeeeeeeeee aieeee bosssa ayee ya yay ya lalalala BASSS
lalala Weeeeeee samba wooo BASSS moc-a-moc rleeeee


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-11-16 19:52 [#02003453]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Barcode: #02003430



"An artist might release ten albums I am
not keen on, and then put out one that I think is
brilliant.
How do I know until I've listened to it? I am willing to
revise my opinion at any moment. "

i wasn't that keen on autechre until i heard untilted and i
knew their music for a long time. after untilted i started
appreciating their other stuff as well. also when you say
you questioned if there's something behind their
music..what's behind bassement jaxx's music?
you either like it or you don't, but it often helps if you
know what you're talking about.

im happy we got someone with broad taste on board thoug,
since we're sort og glued to warp around here..


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-11-17 00:16 [#02003483]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02003430



Barcode, in the first place thanks for having the nervs for
coming over here and defending your case. It's not that
every reviewer who gives an ae-album a 3 comes here openly
to defend his point-of-view.

Regarding reviewing music in general, reading your answers
I've come to believe that reviewing is something different
than just presenting an opinion. A good review, or rather
reviewer, should have (and give) a strong sense of the
(musical/historical) context the music is placed in. Sure,
the reviewer may not like the music. But independent of
whether he likes it or not, the music has a certain
historical/musical value. A good reviewer should be able to
see and describe this value. This is what makes him a
reviewer. Not his personal opinion on the music itself.

And in the case of Autechre. Well, obviously they play a
huge role in this community. Their music has influenced a
lot of other musicians. And almost every new album seems
like a new direction. They are ahead of the herd. And yes,
odds are people won't enjoy it. (which is not the point
anyway)
And about the pretentiousness of their music. They are
anything but. Their music may sound pretentious, but if you
had taken the time to read any interviews it should be clear
that they're only doing what they like best. Independent of
what the world out there may think. Sounds to me like the
opposite of pretentiousness.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-17 02:08 [#02003541]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02003430 | Show recordbag



"Thankfully, I don't have that problem - I listen to
everything I receive with clean ears - no pre-conceptions.
"

how is it not a pre-conception that there should be
"anything to understand behind their art" or else it is bad?


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2006-11-17 02:58 [#02003579]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



it's good to see a bad review for once, I love the album,
but I don't think it'd be good for newcomers, anyone who's a
fan of autechre is going to listen to it anyway, so I don't
see any harm done.

it's a simple and fun album, I don't understand his
critisism of ilpacial, I couldn't stop myself dancing to it
the first time I heard it, but I love drum solo's etc.. I'm
perhaps used to the timings or something, I can't really
tell anymore I air drum to that track all the time, doesn't
sound unusual to me.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2006-11-17 03:01 [#02003582]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



If you read the review I am "questioning" whether there is
something behind their art, questioning is not a
pre-conception.

By the way, I have been listening to electronic music for 25
years and have a very expansive knowledge of it. Barcode's
reviews are particularly descriptive of the music; as I'm
well aware that opinions do not count for much.


 

offline Riccardo from somewhere beyond the ultraworl on 2006-11-17 03:40 [#02003595]
Points: 869 Status: Lurker



I like reviews because it's an easy way to know about new
releases or new artists without searching on the net, but
they don't influence my decision. As for untilted I give it
a 7, it disappoints me a bit even if I saw a live show and
they're great as usual


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-11-17 05:25 [#02003656]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I'm not fussed particularly what you said about Autechre, I
just think your pompous arrogance is hilariously
disproportionate to your position as e-zine editor who
refers to himself in the third person.


 

offline penexpers from Toronto (Canada) on 2006-11-17 06:06 [#02003679]
Points: 4030 Status: Regular



Giving Untilted a 3/10 shows a basic lack understanding at
the way electronic music is evolving and how Autechre are at
the forefront.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-11-17 06:08 [#02003682]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Followup to penexpers: #02003679 | Show recordbag



but it's a step back. reviews are still and opinion.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-17 06:13 [#02003687]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02003582 | Show recordbag



that's not really what I said. I'm still kind of trying to
get an answer to the question about whether or not there has
to be something behind the art for it to be good, and how
you propose you (or anyone) is supposed to be able to grasp
this something without it being explicit.

I also don't really react to what you said about autechre
(I'm not too fond of them myself), I only react to the
notion that the judgement of art should somehow have some
objective measure based on the something "behind it."


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-11-17 06:17 [#02003691]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



It has nothing to do with giving Autechre a bad review. It
has to do with giving anyone a bad review, or anyone a
review, for that matter.

Its an opinion, you say, but why write it in the first place
then, if it has no consequence for anyone else? I cannot be
completely subjective then?

Also, its a lot harder to listen to something without
preconceptions when you have read an article telling you
that what you are about to hear is trash.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-17 06:21 [#02003697]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I kind of actually don't think reviews are such a bad thing,
I just hate the reviews of the kind r40f brilliantly
portrayed up top where they don't seem to talk about the
music at all, and those are abundant these days. Good
reviews are reviews where you don't pretend you've "grasped
the meaning" of the art or anything like that, but rather
talk about what kind of music it is, what other artists it
sounds like (without getting all "oh look at me, I know of
artists no-one else knows about (but everyone knows about
them anyway)").. wait.. I may just want the discogs entry
and some samples, not a review...


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2006-11-17 06:26 [#02003701]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



I hope Barcode uses a dictionary before publishing his
reviews, otherwise he would could look unprofessional.

Also, I think Barcode described 'contrived' not
'pretentious' earlier: "trying too
hard to achieve a certain goal; therefore the music is not
naturally/creatively induced."

Also, barcode said all music is evolution, but then seems to
go on to say that Autechre's music hasn't evolved. "every
piece of music an artist creates is an evolution from
a previous piece of work - or an evolution of someone else's
" and "In our opinion,
it hasn't evolved"

Also, I think i_x_ten is a knob for trying to represent
Xltronic to Barcode the way he did, in an almost fawning
manner, quite embarrassing.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-11-17 07:03 [#02003735]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02003697



Exactly, I have no real problem with reviews like these,
which is why I only really like good reviews, because they
don't discuss the "faults" of the music, only describe what
it sounds like to those that appreciate it. If you made a
site which just had this (and no rating system), I would be
all over it.

The ratings are usually what really get me, though.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2006-11-17 07:46 [#02003759]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



As I have said a number of times already, Barcode takes
great pains to "describe" the music as well as give an
opinion. A lot of readers find our opinions valid, so for
them they are probably happy to read a strong positive or
negative opinion, but I am well aware that a description of
the music is fundamentally necessary. It doesn't work out
that way 100% of the time, but it's a principle.

By the way, the reason I often speak in the third-person is
because I do not write all the reviews on Barcode, it is a
team of 3 or 4.

Also, the ratings on Barcode are deliberately underscored.
When you read most magazines they are going crazy with their
marks, usually because they are paying lip service to labels
so they can continue to receive products. We have had a
couple of labels complaining about how our reviews are
always "negative", so I told them, if you don't like it go
and pay for advertising then make up some quotes to put
underneath. I don't write good reviews for anyone.

By the way Marlowe, you were right in spotting the
contradiction in what I wrote about Autechre's evolution, it
didn't come out quite how I wanted to explain it. What I
meant to say was that the readers' perception is that
Barcode assumes Autechre hasn't evolved, not that the music
has in our opinion not evolved.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-11-17 07:50 [#02003764]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Barcode: #02003759



may i ask what in your opinion makes autechre so popular for
the past 15 years?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-17 07:53 [#02003766]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Barcode:


are you intentionally avoiding my question?


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2006-11-17 07:54 [#02003767]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



Popularity is relative, and hardly an indication of good or
bad taste.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-11-17 08:01 [#02003771]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Barcode: #02003767



popular with reviewers and listeners..if you check music
sites (not neccessarily electronica focused, like allmusic
for example) you can see that they're highly regarded as
influental on the whole electronica scene. it seems to me
that you can't be objective in this case and you base your
opinion on your personal taste.
is that review published on your site maybe?


 

online big from lsg on 2006-11-17 08:06 [#02003773]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



metacritic


 

online big from lsg on 2006-11-17 08:08 [#02003776]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



metacritic on last three ae albums, relatively follows
this boards opinion i'd say


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2006-11-17 08:54 [#02003807]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



I didn't say Autechre was not popular, just that popularity
is not a measurement of whether something is good or bad. In
fact, there is no way of measuring that.

How can you go by Metacritic? It takes a number of reviews
and comes up with a popularity rating. Chuck in another 100
reviews that they don't feature and that rating could change
immeasurably for or against. It's a soft guide at best, not
evidence of anything tangible.



 

online big from lsg on 2006-11-17 08:58 [#02003808]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



yea whatev's
it's the hardest there is. i wans't attacking you anyway but
responding to tolstoyed


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-17 09:00 [#02003809]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



*hugs biggiesmartypants*


 

offline penexpers from Toronto (Canada) on 2006-11-17 09:16 [#02003824]
Points: 4030 Status: Regular



Barcode are you hating on Ae just to be different?


 

online big from lsg on 2006-11-17 09:19 [#02003828]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i bet barcode's gay


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-11-17 09:43 [#02003854]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02003807



There is no way to measure if something is good or bad?

"3.2" does sound like you made an attempt.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2006-11-17 10:00 [#02003871]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



You must be some sort of fool. The whole point of this
discussion is that an opinion is not a measurement of
anything.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-17 10:06 [#02003875]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02003871 | Show recordbag



what about

"in my opinion, that's a three foot long lizard"?

and that little language note aside, an opinion about a work
of art would still be a measurement of how you rate this
work of art, and if we suppose you are sincere about it,
that is even almost as objective as it gets (though it is an
objective statement about your subjective opinion).

furthermore, I think you're a troll.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-11-17 10:11 [#02003878]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



Barcode, your methods of arguing are completely juvenile.
You're a music critic? I'm the fucking president of the
world!


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2006-11-17 10:11 [#02003879]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



It's a pity that I should find a forum about electronic
music - a great passion of mine - only to find it's full of
argumentative, aggressive, childish simpletons.

But then that's web forums for you, the regulars are nearly
always bizarre no-life losers, and your responses
increasingly mirror that.

Good luck nevertheless, but I would only become as sad as
you if I stuck around.


 

offline penexpers from Toronto (Canada) on 2006-11-17 10:25 [#02003881]
Points: 4030 Status: Regular



the regulars are nearly always bizarre no-life losers


 

offline penexpers from Toronto (Canada) on 2006-11-17 10:27 [#02003882]
Points: 4030 Status: Regular | Followup to penexpers: #02003881



What are the addicts?


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-11-17 10:31 [#02003883]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to penexpers: #02003882



don't go there.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-11-17 10:34 [#02003885]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



xltronic pwns critic


 

offline penexpers from Toronto (Canada) on 2006-11-17 10:34 [#02003886]
Points: 4030 Status: Regular | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02003883



The statuses are inaccurate to say the least. A handful of
one-word replies can turn you from a lurker into an addict.

Shouldn't the status be determined by a Time:Points ratio?


 


Messageboard index