Serious Thread: why i feel anti-abortionists are selfish self-righteous assholes | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 499 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Serious Thread: why i feel anti-abortionists are selfish self-righteous assholes
 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-05 15:04 [#01742027]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker | Followup to kaen: #01742022



i agree wholeheartedly!


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-10-05 15:16 [#01742040]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



i too have thoughts and opinions about this issue.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-05 15:19 [#01742043]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #01742040



let's here them


 

offline Fuckwagon from Dallas (United States) on 2005-10-05 15:21 [#01742045]
Points: 1304 Status: Lurker



people under age of consent that get pregnant should have
their babies and then feed them to kaen to gnash them into a
bloody pulp whilst mashing chavs with his left fist


 

offline Fuckwagon from Dallas (United States) on 2005-10-05 15:22 [#01742046]
Points: 1304 Status: Lurker



except i think gnashing involves teeth. so kaen needs to
get teeth installed into his left fist.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-10-05 15:22 [#01742047]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to Crocomire: #01742043



nope, gotta catch a bus.

*aborts xltronic*


 

offline Fuckwagon from Dallas (United States) on 2005-10-05 15:24 [#01742050]
Points: 1304 Status: Lurker



wait i was right though he's gnashing the babies and mashing
the chavs


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-05 15:57 [#01742076]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



I don't know how people can be so black and white for or
against it.

To the pro-choicers - up to what stage do you think it
acceptable to abort?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2005-10-05 17:40 [#01742213]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



theres a short story by Philip K Dick, where its the future,
and you can abort children up to age 12. The reasoning, is
that you don't have a soul until you can do complex math,
and age 12 is the average age for a child to begin to
understand such concepts.

So if you're 11, and the parents don't want you, they can
abort you.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-10-05 18:09 [#01742243]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



i was going to write something clever about consioucness but
then i realised i can't spell the fucking word and have
given up

the end.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-10-05 18:33 [#01742264]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I think you have to take in consideration the circumstances
in which the child is being bought into the world. I think
that some people have kids because they want to jump the
queue in getting housing, i know that happens here. I am
actually pro-choice for reasons other than that of something
which isn't a suspicious fact. Quite a few of the people i
know have had abortions and i thought it was the right move.
They were all in the wrong situation. I honestly think that
if having the child would cause resentment and hatered
towards it for reason out of it's control, i think that is a
totally good reason for it to be aborted. Plus the other
reasons like rapists baby etc. I also think the mans view is
totally valid.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-06 03:34 [#01742395]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to i_x_ten: #01742243 | Show recordbag



consciousness?

mnississippi


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-06 03:35 [#01742396]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01742395 | Show recordbag



-n


 

offline nacmat on 2005-10-06 03:46 [#01742408]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



this is a dificult issue...

the thing is... legally, since when do we start to be human
beings?

I dont know what would I do... well, yes, I am 30 years old
(almost) and I am buying a house with my girl, so I would
have the baby... but what if I was 17?

I say people must have the right to choose... they are gonna
do it anyway, so if its legal, no dirty business raises over
this matter


 

offline OK on 2005-10-06 20:44 [#01743197]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker | Followup to Crocomire: #01741879



well your argument i so very stupid because is based on the
very debate of abortion. how do you know you're right? is
just your belief. by something similar I can conclude that
people that are not religious are selfish cunts.

I have a freind who has a 1 year old daughter, and recently
had an abortion, I coulnd't stop to think about what could
have been, that "zygote" she aborted. Her daughter is just
amazing. It does feel like she killed something. But I
respect her choice


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-10-06 21:00 [#01743200]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



They should make abortion less attractive and pregnancy more
inviting with shows like Pimp My Womb where women can have
bling installed in their lady parts. All cubic zirconiums
inlaid in the cervix and 2500 watt bass ovaries. Fucking
miami bass gynecology, it's all good.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-10-06 21:07 [#01743210]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01743200



:chuckle:


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2005-10-07 02:46 [#01743299]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular



lol

don't you think the problem is deeper and rooted in the
education of "peoples"? it's not really an issue of finding
the line between alive and not alive (that is just stupid
anyway, how are you going to find that :p) if you didn't
have all those "stupid" "accidental" "non thought out"
pregnancies it wouldn't matter THAT much...

sure there'll always be rapers and difficult situations, but
the BIG problem is that now people conceive children WITHOUT
FUCKING THINKING ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES!!!
and the poor babies are at the very heart of the storm, and
they shouldn't be, let's educate people and responsibilise
them for fuck's sake!

-drunken mastah said something about people having children
to jump the queue to have a house...
-there is also girls who want a baby to feel accomplished in
life...
-accidental baby because "oh shit i forgot my pill and
didn't tell my man because i didn't want to upset him"...
-...

i think the real problem is there, education, like always...


give a fish to a starving man and he will eat one day, teach
him to fish and he'll eat all his life


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-10-07 02:51 [#01743301]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



If abortion is murder then a miscarriage must be at least
manslaughter. Imprison all bitches who have miscarriages.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2005-10-07 02:55 [#01743302]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



people should have to pass a test or something before being
allowed to have children. i think unwanted babies etc is
probably cause for a hell of a lot of problems.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-07 13:15 [#01743734]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker | Followup to OK: #01743197



"well your argument i so very stupid because is based on the

very debate of abortion. how do you know you're right?"

it's based on teh debate of abortion? what does that mean/

...
what my debate is based on is not where life begins, but
where the person begins. a person is not a collection of
cells in the womb, a person is what that eventually grows
into and has nothing to do with the body, but with the mind
shaped by its environment.


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2005-10-07 13:20 [#01743738]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular



I'd have to agree with you that pro-lifers are generally
idiots but i think your argument is pretty flawed. Just
because something isn't a person doesn't mean that you
shouldn't have any guilt about killing them.
Do you mean that it's ok to kill them because they're not
people or because they're not conscious?


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-07 13:24 [#01743744]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker | Followup to SValx: #01743738



yes, its ok to kill them because they are not people yet.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-10-07 13:42 [#01743760]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



Fucking miami bass gynecology, it's all good.

holy cow lol


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-07 13:42 [#01743761]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #01743301



haha yep!


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-10-07 13:43 [#01743763]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



my mouth just aborted my chewing gum out onto the desk.

what was the tool for the dastardly deed? laughter.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-07 13:46 [#01743766]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker | Followup to E-man: #01743299



"don't you think the problem is deeper and rooted in the
education of "peoples"? it's not really an issue of finding

the line between alive and not alive (that is just stupid
anyway, how are you going to find that :p) if you didn't
have all those "stupid" "accidental" "non thought out"
pregnancies it wouldn't matter THAT much..."

that's right. these people need to see and acknowledge their
selfish ways before anything starts to change. they need to
man up and realize they are not murdering, but taking their
part in responsibility for the state of the world!


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-10-07 13:57 [#01743773]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



i think the issue is, should we let The Man dictate when we
can and can't reproduce? The Man already wants to dictate
when we can and can't die. We should be asking why The Man
is so interested in our gonads anyway.


 

offline SValx from United Kingdom on 2005-10-07 14:36 [#01743804]
Points: 2586 Status: Regular



So it's ok to kill anything that's not a person? Don't be
daft


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-10-07 14:45 [#01743811]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



Just to play devils advocate, where do you draw the line
Crocomire? At birth? Is it OK to abort a foetus right when
the woman goes into labor? What about within the first five
minutes while it's still slimy and gross?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-10-07 14:52 [#01743817]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



Just have the lady squat over a trashcan, that way nobody
even has to get uterus junk on their hands.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-10-07 14:53 [#01743818]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



doh, sorry that was a bit much... i'm pro choice by the way
and i am also grumpy today.

c-ya


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-10-07 18:34 [#01744006]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker



bah, we're too numerous anyway.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-10-07 18:34 [#01744008]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to Crocomire: #01741879



man gimme the address of your blog


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-10-07 18:35 [#01744010]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to SValx: #01743804



lovely avatar


 

offline yann_g from now on 2005-10-07 18:36 [#01744012]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to SValx: #01743738



as far as i know "pro-life" does not mean "anti-abortion"
and vice-versa.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2005-10-07 21:46 [#01744112]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



Its a parasite until you cut the cord.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-10-08 08:30 [#01744251]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



If technology was superr advanced beforre I was borrn, and
they could have scanned me in womb to see if I'd have been
borrn with this birrthmarrk, I'd have hoped that my parrents
would have been smarrt enough to fucking have an aborrtion
and sparre me all the shit, mental and physical, that I've
been forrced to go thrrough and felt I had to go thrrough.
Life isn't a special gift, it's a nightmarre.


 

offline 7Pd from britney's upskirt vagina on 2005-10-08 08:50 [#01744265]
Points: 866 Status: Lurker



how about this....

if you have an abortion, you should be forced to kill your
first subsequent offspring within 24 hrs of its birth.

and if you actively campaign against abortions, you or your
daughter must be raped until falling pregnant...

this happy arrangement should sort it all out, surely...


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-10-08 09:04 [#01744278]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



a person is not a person until it realizes it is. do you
remember being a zygote? i know i don't. and don't tell me
you do, because unless you're some kind of freak, you
don't.


If I was to perform brain surgery on somebody without
anesthetic, chances are they wouldn't remember it
afterwards, therefore by your logic it would be a humane
act...there is still no real conclusive evidence as to what
stage a baby feels pain and is aware of its surroundings.

the persons who seek abortion do so for a number of
reasons, but basiclly because they are not ready to nurture
and bring forth properlly another human being.


They shouldn't have been having unprotected sex then should
they. Obviously there are cases such as rape etc. where
abortion is an opinion to be considered. But say a child is
born and then the perant decides they don't want it should
they be able to terminate it's life as long as the child is
not aware it is happening?

i see lots of anti-abortionists with their signs out
front
of the abortion clinic, and they even go so far as to plant
numerous white-painted wooden crosses in front of the
clinic
to represent the lost lives of these pre-people. they need
to feel better about themselves, so they protest; they say
they're pro-life. of course that's what they'd say. would
they say that they're pro-death? of course not.


A childish and immature comment. If they truely beleive a
murder is being committed then they may feel they are
morally obliged to challenge it.

society would be better off without people raised in an
unhealthy situation precipitated by immature and/or
unworthy
parents. but the anti-abortionists aren't about reality,
only about self-righteousness. they are Idiots!


You're the idiot for your little rant. There are so called
"pro abortionists" in the UK who agree with anti
abortionists in the US regarding things such as partial
birth abortion which wasn't outlawed until recently and also
the time into a pregnancy that abo


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-10-08 09:05 [#01744279]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



abortion is allowed. It's not as simple a black and white
issue as you make out.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-10-08 09:36 [#01744289]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to E-man: #01743299 | Show recordbag



I did?

house queue?


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2005-10-08 12:02 [#01744356]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



I want to do like a comedian once said and run into an
abortion clinic shouting "Abort! abort!"


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-08 13:32 [#01744445]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01744278



"If I was to perform brain surgery on somebody without
anesthetic, chances are they wouldn't remember it
afterwards, therefore by your logic it would be a humane
act..."

that statement makes me feel you're an idiot.

"there is still no real conclusive evidence as to what
stage a baby feels pain and is aware of its surroundings."

so does that one. i'm not gonna bother responding further.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-10-08 14:06 [#01744480]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Crocomire: #01744445 | Show recordbag



In what way? You are simply assuming that because you have
no recollection of being in the womb that a foetus is
incapable of feeling pain. There are professors who claim
26 weeks and others who claim 16 weeks as the start of the
foetus feeling pain. In the UK there is a 24 week limit on
abortion, in the US partial birth abortion was permitted to
the end of the sixth month of pregnancy, in both cases the
foetus' could be experiencing pain during the termination.
Is that humane?

If a child is injured in an accident and suffers brain
damage as a result and the parents feel they aren't in a
condition to look after that child and given that "the mind
shaped by its environment" no longer exists should there be
an option for termination at that stage, especially as the
child will never form a productive part of society a
termination would surely just be them "taking their
part in responsibility for the state of the world"?

The fact you haven't came up with any constructive
arguements (I'm sorry but "I think your an idiot" doesn't
count) and having now read your other posts in this topic it
is clear you haven't got a proper grasp of this topic and it
was pointless me responding in the first place.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-08 14:16 [#01744487]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



"You are simply assuming that because you have
no recollection of being in the womb that a foetus is
incapable of feeling pain."

i never said that.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-08 14:22 [#01744492]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



i think it's daedniarb


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-10-08 14:29 [#01744507]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"nope. that's my point. i can't remember being a person
until
around 2."


You used that as justification.

Now I could, if I chose, respond to your childish insults
and eventually make both of us look stupid...but on this
occassion I will refrain and allow you to continue acheiving
the opposite of what you beleive you are doing.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-10-09 09:36 [#01745104]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



Apart from a handful of critical replies towards the end,
this thread is completely devoid of any worth.

The topic rant itself is incoherent and erratic.. the
expression of your feelings, as opposed to the feelings
themselves, ermmm.. "makes me feel you're an idiot."


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2005-10-09 15:00 [#01745271]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01745104



"the expression of your feelings, as opposed to the feelings

themselves, ermmm.. "makes me feel you're an idiot.""

well i'm sorry, oh scholar, i have trouble with expression.
it's part of my personality disorder, so i guess that does
make me an idiot. :/ but did not my feelings get through,
even if their expression didn't messure up to your oh so
lofty standards?


 


Messageboard index