|  | 
        
         |  | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 11:37 [#01592749] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01592743
 | 
| 
     
 
 | totally true.  but at the same time, i can't think of any modern war more acceptable to have been involved in than
 ww2, and i say that as a vehemently anti-war pacifist.
 
 BUT, what the americans did with internment camps for the
 japanese and dropping the bombs is totally utterly
 inexcusable.  the bombs didn't even need to be dropped
 because the japanese leaders tried to surrender to the
 soviets.  it was a despicable act. they wanted to show up
 the soviets and start the cold war because they wanted an
 arms race for the economy.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 11:38 [#01592754] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01592745
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i don't want to skew anything you say.  please elaborate. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 11:40 [#01592756] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01592754
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I just think you characterized Iraq (read: saddam) as a benign leader of a helpless little country... which, I don't
 think is exactly accurate.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 11:45 [#01592761] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01592756
 | 
| 
     
 
 | he was a shitty dictator who killed lots of people over the years.  he committed awful crimes, sure.  on the other hand,
 iraq had no nukes or wmds and they weren't even close to
 being as powerful as saudi arabi or iran.  we went in there
 with the full knowledge that there was nothing to be gained
 except the murders of thousands more innocent women and
 children and an oil pipeline.  there was no legitimate
 reason for choosing iraq to topple rather than the much
 worse oppressive dictatorships all over the world except
 that it's how we have our economics/diplomatic relations set
 up with iraq as the punching bag.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 11:48 [#01592762] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I don't really see how the killing of civilians would be a goal for us.  I mean, I could buy the argument of blatant
 recklessness, but purposfully targetting civilians?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  mrgypsum
             on 2005-05-09 11:49 [#01592765] Points: 5112 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01592749
 | 
| 
     
 
 | if you ask me - WW2 has been sold absolutely....meaning the justifications for going to war have ripples we still feel
 to this day - and probably will always feel whenever a
 chance for war arises. that to me is very dangerous - the
 government can always pick the scab and get the people all
 charged up for war, just by bringing WW2 terms into the mix.
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  big
             from lsg on 2005-05-09 11:51 [#01592769] Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | 1 iraqee per 1000 has died an unnatural death since the invasion by the us
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 11:52 [#01592770] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01592762
 | 
| 
     
 
 | that's not what i meant by that.  i meant we knew it was going to happen.  the insiders organizing this knew that we
 were going to have to get our hands really dirty.  there's
 just no way around it.  that's part of war.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  big
             from lsg on 2005-05-09 11:53 [#01592772] Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01592769 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | mm, that's 'just' a few thousand, anyhoo, it's a big mess now, though that's to blame on extremists and stuff in the
 first place
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 11:54 [#01592775] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I think we legitimately thought there was a good chance Saddam had wmd.  Was the intelligence as strong as they
 tried to have us believe? No.  But, did the admin know for a
 fact that they didn't have it?  No, I don't believe so.
 
 And, the burden of proof, for showing that they did not have
 wmd layed squarely on Saddam.  The UN agreed on that several
 times, and yet did nothing.  The sanctions were killing
 thousands of innocent civilians every month.  The course of
 action that the UN was choosing was not working.  It was not
 saving lives and it was not accomplishing it's core goals.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  brokephones
             from Londontario on 2005-05-09 11:59 [#01592780] Points: 6113 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | We need some extra terrestrials to attack us. Maybe then we will unite.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Skink
             from A cesspool in eden on 2005-05-09 12:01 [#01592781] Points: 7483 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | It is also fair to say that the cold war was a lie in the first place. The Soviet union didn't have the economy to
 build loads of weapons. Which is why the soviet union fell,
 because the american administration made up a cock and bull
 story.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-05-09 12:02 [#01592783] Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to epohs: #01592745
 | 
| 
     
 
 | well yours is even more flawed. 
 the war didn't take place years ago, it took place now, when
 iraq is/was a helpless benign nation.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 12:03 [#01592785] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01592775
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i don't know how anyone bought that nonsense about the wmds, i'm sorry man.  they had collin powell with a blurry b&w of
 a toolshed and he was going, "uh yeah, there's nukes in here
 i guess".  it was total bullshit.  i didn't believe it for a
 second.  they lied to us.  nothing short of complete lies.
 
 and who do you think loves sanctions, the least effective
 method of dealing with dictators ever?  i'll give you a hint
 - the country that's been starving out cuba for a while...
 the country that laughs in the face of that extraneous
 UN...
 
 besides, even if saddam somehow hypothetically had nukes,
 that was absolutely no reason to invade iraq.  what about
 all the other insane dictators with nukes?  we didn't invade
 them...  but we did need that pipeline and we did need to
 fight our war on terr.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  mrgypsum
             on 2005-05-09 12:03 [#01592786] Points: 5112 Status: Regular | Followup to brokephones: #01592780
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes - this would rule - think about what would happen if that actually occurred - anti war protests - gone (for the
 most part, only those wierd cults would not want us to kill
 the aliens) - wmd - USE THEM, need something that will show
 then who's the boss, it would really be a unifying factor
 "all humans must come together and destroy the enemy"
 
 reminds me of the film starship troopers
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 12:06 [#01592793] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01592783
 | 
| 
     
 
 | The only (at least the main) reason they were so hobbled is because of the sanctions. The sanctions were manipulated by
 Saddam so that they were almost solely targetting civilians,
 and they were not really putting pressure on him to comply
 with the resolutions that the UN was trying to impose.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  brokephones
             from Londontario on 2005-05-09 12:07 [#01592795] Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01592786
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Ironically enough, that movie had nazi undertones. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  brokephones
             from Londontario on 2005-05-09 12:08 [#01592797] Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to brokephones: #01592795
 | 
| 
     
 
 | And book 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 12:09 [#01592802] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01592785
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I'm not claiming he had nukes, and I'm claiming that oil was not a factor. But, I do think the ball was in Saddam's court
 to prove that he didn't have them, and I don't think that he
 did... in fact, I think he actively tried to twart all
 attempts to verify the truth.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 12:09 [#01592803] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01592793
 | 
| 
     
 
 | you need to kill more civilians to save them?  i don't get that at all.  we killed way more innocent people in the
 invasion than saddam ever did over the years.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 12:10 [#01592806] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01592802
 | 
| 
     
 
 | and I'm not claiming that oil was not a factor. 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-05-09 12:10 [#01592807] Points: 12878 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | and anyhow - bush was talking about invading iraq the second he got into office in his first term. the wmd thing was made
 up - everyone knew iraq didn't have capabilities to make
 wmd, and that the only reason saddam was being a bollocks
 with weapons inspectors was that he viewed them as both an
 insult and a violation of Iraq's sovereignty and Iraqi
 pride.
 
 so that just leaves the current idea perpetuated by blair
 and bush - that it's good they went in because they also
 went in to LIBERATE the iraqi people.
 
 If they had ever given a shit about the Iraqis they would've
 -
 1) not provided them with weapons and chemicals to perform
 ethnic clensing
 2) done something about it in the late 80s early 90s when
 all that horrific stuff was at its peak (and US
 contributions of arms and chemicals were at their peak)
 3) stopped the UN sanctions and performed regime change from
 the inside out, the way that the Americans have proved
 works, with all the other regime changes they've performed
 over the years, in order to topple economically unfavourable
 governments.
 
 They didn't do this last point because it would've left the
 Iraqis in charge to decide who would be in power, instead of
 the Americans to choose a prime minister who would keep Iraq
 selling oil by the dollar and not euro and would set up a
 government that would play kindly with the American economy.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 12:10 [#01592808] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01592803
 | 
| 
     
 
 | well, what is the solution then?  lift the sanctions and hope that saddam behaves?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 12:11 [#01592809] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01592802
 | 
| 
     
 
 | maybe he did, who knows?  you don't invade a country based on maybe someone thinks he has a nuke hidden away that he
 can't deploy without being annhilated by the real countries
 in the area.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 12:12 [#01592811] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01592807
 | 
| 
     
 
 | if everyone knew that Saddam didn't have wmd, then why was Hanz Blix looking for them?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-05-09 12:12 [#01592812] Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to epohs: #01592808
 | 
| 
     
 
 | third point of my post. i'll put up information about regime changes that've occured from the inside out, due to american
 funding, to appease american interests, if you wish.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  brokephones
             from Londontario on 2005-05-09 12:13 [#01592814] Points: 6113 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Hanz Bwix! 
 
 
 | 
        |  | Attached picture | 
	
	 |  | 
   | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-05-09 12:14 [#01592815] Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to epohs: #01592811
 | 
| 
     
 
 | To prove to the world, on paper, that they didn't have them. It's beaurocracy.
 
 I'm not at all complaining about it, it's right to have
 weapons inspectors, and to prove outright that a country has
 no capability of making wmds.. but it was the opinion of
 anyone with common sense that they didn't.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 12:14 [#01592816] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #01592807
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  bogala
             from NYC (United States) on 2005-05-09 12:16 [#01592819] Points: 5125 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | It was the Russian winter that won ww2 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-05-09 12:17 [#01592820] Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to bogala: #01592819
 | 
| 
     
 
 | and their scorched earth policy. 
 wow, it was my reply to this thread that turned this into an
 Iraq War discussion.
 
 POWA.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  bogala
             from NYC (United States) on 2005-05-09 12:17 [#01592821] Points: 5125 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I can think of a few countries that are shady and blatantly developing WMD's..Let's roll baby. Kill'em all. woohoo.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-05-09 12:19 [#01592823] Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to bogala: #01592821
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Looks like North Korea is next on your list. 
 You might get bitten badly this time. And the whole world
 will suffer as a result.
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2005-05-09 12:19 [#01592825] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to bogala: #01592821
 | 
| 
     
 
 | great idea!  let's start with north korea!  ready for the draft?  ready for all your friends to die?  another vietnam?
 ready to tangle with china?  another cold war?
 
 sounds good, you go first.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2005-05-09 12:20 [#01592826] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | geopolitics is awesome! 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  redrum
             from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-05-09 12:23 [#01592829] Points: 12878 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | WELL IT'S ONE TWO THREE WHAT ARE WE FIGHTIN FOR
 DON'T ASK ME I DON'T GIVE A DAMN
 NEXT STOP IS VIETNAM
 
 AND IT'S FIVE SIX SEVEN
 OPEN UP THE PEARLY GATES
 WELL, HELL, THERE AIN'T NO TIME TO WONDER WHY
 WHOOPEE WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  E-man
             from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2005-05-10 05:04 [#01593481] Points: 3000 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | :| 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  big
             from lsg on 2005-05-10 05:06 [#01593482] Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | why would you blame the americans on this board? imo they're pretty alrighty  :)
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  manicminer
             from Paris (France) on 2005-05-10 05:17 [#01593489] Points: 1423 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01592577
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Netherlands didn't have the biggest percentage decimation of Jews - it was here, in Lithuania.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Bob Mcbob
             on 2005-05-10 05:25 [#01593495] Points: 9939 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i stab myself in the leg with a fork every time i laugh while watching MASH, to remind myself war isnt all fun and
 games...
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  brokephones
             from Londontario on 2005-05-10 09:59 [#01593694] Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #01593495
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I would also stab myself if i laughed while watching MASH because it sucks.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         | Messageboard index
 
 
        
 |