MPC 1000 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 95 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613808
Today 30
Topics 127525
  
 
Messageboard index
MPC 1000
 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-05-05 01:31 [#01587238]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to sine wave: #01587212



Yeah... a lot of their gear looks pretty standard. Untill
you look at the circuitbending that has been done to it.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-05-05 07:43 [#01587551]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



I'd love to know what they were up to. Not because it's
Autechre, but because there seemed to be (as you said) very
standard machines up there spewing out the most amazing
stuff. I guess there is a lot of customization going on.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2006-12-11 11:17 [#02015983]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



Ok, just ordered myself a MPC1000. Should be arriving in the
next few days. Actually quite excited :D

Plus, new mixer for Christmas to replace my borked one
(half the channels are dead)

I'm fairly sure this is the missing link needed to produce
what I want before frustration takes over.
Had been using software for midi sequencing but it zaps my
ideas so quickly.

Recently I've been pumping out quick loops on the SP303 and
then building on that and it's worked quite well.
Of course the 303 sequencing is best described as a toy
(albeit a good toy) time for the big boys....MPC... can't
wait.

P.S. looking at the unofficial JJOS, so many good
reviews. Anyone got it? I think I will. Only $30



 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-12-11 12:54 [#02016035]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to dave_g: #02015983



I haven't tried the new os, but everybody I've talked to who
has is pretty thrilled with it.


 

offline lateral speid from LOS ANGELES (United States) on 2006-12-11 20:39 [#02016256]
Points: 190 Status: Lurker



the onboard sequencer is lacking?!?

never heard that one before...


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-12-11 20:54 [#02016258]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



those are old, silly, foolish posts that make me cringe. :-(


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-12-11 21:41 [#02016264]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



ghosts of xltronic..


 

offline vveerrgg from life (Canada) on 2006-12-12 11:59 [#02016515]
Points: 846 Status: Lurker



been using the MPC4000 fo rthe better part of a year and
love it....

for those ppl who like working with gear it's a refreshing
compliment to any midi gear... right now it's the brains of
my studio.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-01-26 08:18 [#02038370]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



So I finally got my MPC1000 lastnight after waiting over a
month! I've managed to be more creative with it in a few
hours than the last few weeks with the computer.
so much fun to use as well. It's perfect for me. I'm so
happy with it. The only thing is some people have had
problems with the pads deteriorating after a while,
hopefully it won't be me as well.

I'm gunna go and play on it now, but will probably get the
JJOS in a few days, so if anyone wants a review watch this
thread!


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2007-01-26 14:37 [#02038602]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to dave_g: #02038370



Yeah, they are great fun. I still haven't wanted to get into
JJ yet. I am so accustomed to the proprietary os, I haven't
felt too compelled.

And with that, its back to warcraft.


 

offline nurse from a darkness more than night (Finland) on 2007-05-22 14:43 [#02086385]
Points: 242 Status: Lurker



was wondering if all you other mpc1000 users want to share
tips and methods of working with the mpc1k, im yet to really
discover all its potential but would especially like to know
how you build up your loops and sequences.

the problem im having is with saving sequences iv been
working on, do you have to build up a song and then make
that into a sequence and save that or is it better to
resample and save etc.?

have any of you used it live, if you have then how?

thanks


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2007-05-22 18:52 [#02086475]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular | Followup to nurse: #02086385



that was somehow a very VERY tiring post you made there.
Just don't think too much, just DO it, experiment.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-05-22 19:12 [#02086478]
Points: 21444 Status: Lurker



It has a cool name like Ed 209.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2007-05-23 00:37 [#02086513]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to nurse: #02086385



I will generally write a simple loop, then copy it a bunch
of times, add variations and changes and deletions of things
in each loop, go into song mode and then arrange those loops
into cohesive larger sections, then export them as
sequences, then I get into writing melodies over that. From
there you can get into copying those melodies into other
sequences, making changes, and then arranging those longer
sequences into songs.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-05-25 07:24 [#02087436]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02038602



The latest JJ is extremely stable :) akai v2.10 has a
critical bug where it would save corrupted data
occasionally. akai have only just fixed it!

The JJ takes all the annoying bits of the akai stuff and
makes it how it should be and keeps all the bits that work
anyway.
grid edit is seriously so good. I use it as a midi sequencer
and copy/paste notes graphically, shift them do all sorts.

I seriously urge you to get the latest JJOS, it has
literally doubled the abilities of this box of tricks. if
you really dont want JJ, at least make sure you get the
latest akai with the critical fix if you're running 2.10


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-10-13 10:00 [#02131768]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



Good news MPC 1000 users.
Akai have released a fix for the pads on the 1000.
As you may or may not know, the MPC1000 has a design problem
where the pads will slowly deteriorate over time. This is
because akai make each pad self contained.
They have now released an "upgrade" aka fix. this puts all
the pads together (like the tried and tested old MPCs) this
fixes the only flaw with the box.
Along with the JJOS, this thing is such a brilliant music
box, I cant begin to say how much I love it!

Linkage


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-10-13 10:14 [#02131774]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to dave_g: #02131768 | Show recordbag



Link tunes made on it by you!


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2007-10-13 13:31 [#02131928]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



i want a qy700


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2007-10-13 14:46 [#02131962]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



i've just ordered one, consequences be damned


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-10-13 17:30 [#02132051]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #02131962



get the JJOS and you will be a happy man. I would say use
the boring akai OS for a while then get JJOS and see how
much better it is, but what the hell, just get the JJ!
Basically a Japanese guy has written a much better OS (I
suspect he is an ex akai employee) anyway, it gives the
machine loads of extra facilities, such as grid edit, which
are very useful. The midi grid edit is where I live at the
moment, it's great stuff.
I would suggest you use my link above and navigate the to
JJOS section of the MPC forums thing. More info than you can
shake a stick at.
The MPC1000 isn't the best box you can buy, but for the
money, it is amazing value. JJOS is £15 and you can always
get a free upgrade to the latest and greatest version.
Since getting the MPC, the blockage in my song making
process has been eliminated. It's seriously good stuff.
Check out the JJOS at
http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/%7Empc1000/
Let me know how you get on.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2007-10-13 18:18 [#02132079]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #02132051



cheers! i've looked into JJOS a few times in the past and it
seems like a big improvement (and akai admit that
themselves, from what i can tell). i'll probably have a mess
around on the standard one first and upgrade when i have a
better idea of the differences it'd make.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2007-10-31 17:20 [#02139583]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



dave, this thing is awesome. i got my jj serial earlier
today

i have one question you might be able to help with - if i
load a break, can i assign it to multiple pads but set a
different start point on each one, or do i need to make
copies of the sample and trim it for each pad? i don't want
to slice it as i want it to play to the end every time.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-11-20 12:29 [#02145932]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to horsefactory: #02139583



Sorry Sam, I missed your post. JJ is fantastic isn't it! The
feature you want is available in JJOS2!
linkage.

I am so excited about this. The original JJOS was amazing
value for money and literally doubled what the box can do,
and now this new version does it again. The price is well
worth it by the looks of things, and considering the
tireless bug fixing and feature adding of the previous
version, I'm totally thrilled at the new possibilities.

ADSR envelopes = make programs like a "proper" sampler
Multiple trigger points per sample (like you want) =
fantastic

And also strong £ and weak $ = value for money approaching
infinity. (Well for UK anyway)

ALL MPC 1000 USERS CHECK THIS OUT!


 

offline EDDIE MURPHY from EDDIE (United States) on 2007-11-20 13:07 [#02145953]
Points: 111 Status: Regular



EDDIE MURPHY


 


Messageboard index