 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)big ...and 356 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614130 Today 2 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"In fact, i can't believe i'm selling it." You blatently have millions |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i think it's pretty cool : ) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I wonder what percentage the photographer/manipulator of the original photo is going to get. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
unmatched brutality |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what is Lord Vader doing there? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
isn't it just pic of richard probably bevvied up sticking his face in a photocopier? thats what i always thought anyway. we can thank the lord it wasn't his plummers crack. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
nacmat - after you slated me on me on the mu board i relalised some people might be confused so i updated the auction information with the following statement which you've missed... On 04-May-05 at 12:17:43 BST, seller added the following information: In case there's any confusion about the origins of this item, i state in the ad that it's a portrait, not a "self" portrait. The painting was done by me, not by Aphex Twin. If you bid, then good luck! i can't see what the big deal is? have you sold cds on ebay? have you bought an unofficial t-shirt before? have you downloaded music on soulseek and then never bought the records? you're not strictly allowed to do those things most of the time but of course you have done. i've provided a link to show it's hand painted, it's not anything i'm going to do again, i'm not robbing anyone or claiming it's something it's not. cheer up eh nacmat |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Presenting an absolutely AMAZING portrait of the Aphex Twin. Taken from a 2001 NME interview, the original pic was mangled up and handed over by the man himself for the article. i nowhere saw that it wasnt by him |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i meant the photo for the article, not the painting. i realise how it could be misinterpreted and that's why i added the note. it was never my intention to trick anyone, i just worded it poorly. anyone who knows aphex knows he would never have done something like this anyway |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
okay then :) he painted the painting for i care because you do though or do you mean he wouldnt have painted over a picture? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the original |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
its not bad to sell on ebay if you have cleared that, then good, thanks, I hadnt seen it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
cool but i wouldn't want it. not in a million yearrs. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
is it legal for someone to go paint that then sell without Rich's/whoever designed that originally's permission |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
