Drugs are tools for thought | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 279 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Drugs are tools for thought
 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 13:50 [#01326670]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01326667



addiction is the key element you are missing, you lose
control and become addicted.

drugs alter your state of mind, they control you. you
cannot relate them to anything such as books, movies, web
sites, porn, all of these things will not take hold of you
the way that drugs will.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 13:51 [#01326674]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01326669



maybe i see them as the same


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2004-09-06 13:53 [#01326677]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326670



thats not entirely true. tv, porn, movies, music, any kind
of media can become addictive in the same manner as a drug
and can lead to self destructive behavior. it just doesn't
happen very often. at the end of the day, it always comes
down to the individual, and alot of people are prone to drug
addiction for whatever reasons.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 13:57 [#01326680]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to zaphod: #01326677



i thought of this when i was posting my reply, but drugs
take it a step further i think, tell me if i am wrong, but
to me there is someting more destructing in abusing weed
than tv addiction or something. maybe not sex addiction
though, good point on that.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2004-09-06 14:01 [#01326683]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



i'm sure its been scientifically proven that weed or any
hard drug for that matter is quite a bit more dangerous than
television, but the sort of mind numbing effects seem to be
the same.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:09 [#01326707]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326680



the only thing that seperates tv, chocolate, cigarette,
sexual, etc... addiction from "drug" addiction is the
legallity.

you may think it's silly, because nobody kills someone for
chocolate... but, make it illegal and i guarantee people
will be dying. the street value of chocolate will go
through the roof, and a blackmarket will develop.

it is the fact that "drugs" are illegal is what makes them
so dangerous.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:11 [#01326712]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01326707



i am done on this one, chocolate does not change your state
of mind, i can operate machinery after i eat chocolate, so
they are diff, but i see what you are saying, all i am
saying is the harder drugs should not be legal.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:16 [#01326726]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326712



they are different, of course... i thought we were talking
about addiction.

however, my point is that there are already laws against
operating machinery while under the influence.

if someone is caught doing this they should be punished...
but, i shouldn't be punished because there is a possibility
that i may operate machinery while under the influence.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:21 [#01326738]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326712



you mean like this stuff?


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:23 [#01326740]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



what about anti-depressants that have a suicide
side-effect?

should those be illegal too?

suddently weed and other recreational drug use doesn't seem
so bad.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:24 [#01326744]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01326738



no, not prescription stuff, i am talking about crack,
heroin, coke...


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:26 [#01326745]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



your opinion is not wrong, i am not attacking the way you
look at this, what i am saying is that certain drugs should
remain illegal


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:26 [#01326746]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



and i always thought anythign had the potential for
addiction. liek rape? murder? cutting? food?

obesity is the number 1 cause of death in the USA. should
food be illegal? it's obviously a huge addiction.

it's not about the substances, it's about the people who use
them. making a substance illegal will fix someone's appeal
for addiction.

and doing drugs now and then does not make you addicted. i
don't care how much meth, or coke you've done.. you dont
become automatically addicted. it goes deeper than that.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:27 [#01326749]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326745



but some prescription drugs ARE coke and crack and meth.

where do you draw the line? when someone does a few lines at
parties? or when you raise you're child on meth for his
whole life and wonder why he's so fucked up and can't
function normally in society?


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:28 [#01326750]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01326746



er

'will not fix someone's appeal for addiction."


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:29 [#01326752]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01326746



you know what, lets stick with drugs, you are arguing in
terms of ideas, not about reality. you are bleeding ideas
together, society is not run on rational rules, its not a
scale you should balance across the board.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:30 [#01326754]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



this whole issue is very far from being black and white.
there are sooo many different aspects to consider.

and knowing the organization that has create laws about this
gray issue is 99% concerned about the size of his and his
friends pockets.. well that's just plain scary.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:32 [#01326755]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326752



ideas? um.. as far i know, all those 'ideas' ARE reality.

why don't you go do some research.. you know, check out some
stats and such.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:33 [#01326756]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326745



and what i'm trying to say is that making drugs illegal
creates FAR more problems than it solves.



 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:34 [#01326760]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326655



read the reply i made hear for my opinions on the current us
drug policy.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:36 [#01326765]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01326756



so propose a system that will eliminate some of the
problems.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:36 [#01326766]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



we're treated like monkeys.. like babies.

like when McDonalds stop serving supersized food. i mean,
there's plenty of gasoline around we know not to dirnk it.

but what do you expect.. when you're treated like a baby for
all you're life, you'll act like one.

so, maybe if the role of daddy changed a bit.. there
wouldn't be so many babies running around.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:37 [#01326770]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



mm and you know how much babies love candy!



 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:38 [#01326773]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



omg i'm bored.

i think i've already typed all this in 5 other drug
threads.

anyone wanna bump?


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:38 [#01326775]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



i dislike the current us drug policy, read I DO NOT AGREE
WITH IT

but i think nations like holland, take a too liberal view on
drugs.

something in the middle would be the best.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:39 [#01326780]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01326770



your sarcasm for the human race is astounding.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:40 [#01326781]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326765



- legalize drugs.

- regulate their use like we currently do hard liquor. this
will create vast sums of revenue for the gov't.

- invest that extra money in education, REAL scientific
research into the effects of said drugs, and social
programs.

- enforce laws that already exist.



 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:41 [#01326784]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326780



everything she's said so far has been right on.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:43 [#01326787]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



sound kind of like leftist elitism if you ask me.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:44 [#01326790]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



ohh la la astounding. i wish i knew what that meant.. if
only i paid attention in english class instead of smoking
crack with my chem teacher in the washroom.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-09-06 14:45 [#01326794]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326765



"so propose a system that will eliminate some of the
problems. "

i already did! check it out:

drugs should be decriminalized so that

- there aren't jails filled with sick people who can't
control the crimes they commit.
- there are no more drug-related crimes.
- there are no more illegal drugs coming in and therefore
no more drug dealers or drug market.

all this while simultaneously spending money to set up drug
rehab programs that actually work (this has been done in
successful tests in some european countries) and education
to prevent people from taking the drugs.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:45 [#01326796]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326787



what is elitist about anything that's been said in this
thread so far?


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:46 [#01326797]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01326790



i dont remember saying you werent a smart person, where in
my post did i say anything to the contrary

but you are writing some people as if most of them are
stupid and childish.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:47 [#01326798]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



but what do you expect.. when you're treated like a baby
for
all you're life, you'll act like one.

so, maybe if the role of daddy changed a bit.. there
wouldn't be so many babies running around.



 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:49 [#01326802]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326797



McDonalds was forced to get rid of their supersizing because
most of America is obese and that is the leading cause of
death.

That says it all.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:49 [#01326803]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01326781



i am done


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:49 [#01326804]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326798



oh and i wasn't saying that you said i wasn't smart.. i was
just continuing with my astounding sarcasm.

:)


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:50 [#01326805]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326798



that's not elitism. that's calling the government out on
the fact that they treat us like children by telling us what
we are and are not allowed to consume in the privacy of our
own homes.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:52 [#01326809]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326803



you're done a lot of times.

it's okay, don't run or be done. don't you like to have your
intellect challenged? i do. that's why arguing and debating
is fun fun fun!


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:52 [#01326810]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01326802



there you go, what does that mean though, so its food, so
what, people like food, but that does mean they are children
because they like more, no we need to survive and hey it is
marketed down our throats. maybe brainwashed but by no means
less intelligent than either you or me.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 14:55 [#01326813]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326810



see, you just said it but didn't figure it out.

brainwashed, told what to do, forced to be consumer whores,
taught to over-consume... kinda like school eh?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:56 [#01326815]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326810



i think you're misunderstanding.

you're treated like a child by the gov't when they tell you
that you cannot have a big fry because you'll get fat.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:57 [#01326816]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01326815



i should be able to make that decision on my own.

the problem is a lack of education... and, i DO believe that
proper education is the gov'ts responsibility.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:57 [#01326817]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01326813



no, if you have a family and are providing for them you have
to be a consumer, its easy to become brainwashed into
certain things, that pop culture. people naturally do what
their neighbors do, coerced or not.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-06 14:58 [#01326819]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01326816



...or, at least an adequate education.

of course, much of the responsibility lies with the
parents... but, it's hard for them to teach proper values
and priorities when they themselves were poorly educated.



 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 14:59 [#01326820]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326817



not even necesarily having a family, just being a person in
a societly like the us's, you can become brainwashed without
even knowing it.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 15:00 [#01326823]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326817



there's a difference between being a consumer and being a
consumer whore.

it's easy to be brainwashed into things.. BECAUSE WE LIVE IN
A DADDY CHILD TYPE SOCIETY.

that is why it is easy to be brainwashed. we are intensely
repressed and treated like children. what do you expect??


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 15:02 [#01326824]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



even johnny phd might like his fries supersized, even he is
behaving as a consumer,

example, when i was in college i hate SUV's, they
represented all that i hated about the us and consumerism
and excess

as soon as i started a family and all that jazz, i find
myself more and more needing a vehicle with the capabilities
of an SUV, have i been brainwashed, yes and no, i am smart
enough to know i dont really need one, but i do need one
because my family has increased in size, thus i need more
space and all that stuff,



 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-09-06 15:03 [#01326826]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01326824



dude, you're not listening. this isn't about consuming..
that was an example. you're side tracking.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-06 15:04 [#01326827]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01326823



i agree with this except for the last part.


 


Messageboard index