 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)recycle ...and 266 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613475 Today 1 Topics 127502 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it makes sense |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it makes sense that it looks more like they found a way to quantitatively classify music in genres instead of quantifying the complexity (which, to me, was rather disappointing)? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
complexity it's another arbitrary standard of classifying things but it's not like the most complex the better. they could have used 'simplicity' for what is worth. what i was gathering from that study is that different types of music (regardless of the genre) have different time masking and emotional responses. but the responses you could get are totally dependent on the way your trained your ears across the years. dependent is also the definition of genre and the effect such genre has on you. i'm listening to a lot of music but lately i'm restricting my choice to a few tracks in a day, played repeatedly and xometimes insanely but without any specific goal (for my own amusement), and i noticed that different genres have clearly a different effect on me. often i play some music with the deliberate aim to feel the effect such genre plays on me. and the more i succeed, the more this kind of psychological dependence becomes evident. in conclusion i don't know what that study is talking about but if i translated your post correctly, i think what i just said it's pretty relevant. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
wanna see a complex rhythm, come see me doing sexing. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ok |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
