This woman named "Ann Coulter" | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 410 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
This woman named "Ann Coulter"
 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-14 14:47 [#01033423]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



this shows I don't take politics too seriously).
Secondly is that the idea that other people have an
obligation to "carry" the weak, foolish and idle is
so off the wall to me I can't bear to vote for anything that
would increase this mentality in our society.

A point in my favour is that I've been a tory since I
thought as an adult and I will probably continue to be for
the rest of my life. Thats got to be better than these kids
who are apolitical till they go to uni, buy into liberal
leftist nonsense (BIG "nb" here... I'm not decrying liberal
or leftist politics, I'm talking about the idiotic, utterly
impractical, never voted in in a million years, really loony
lefty ideas that a large number of politically active
students seem to get upon going to university) for the time
they're there and then two years out of college and in the
real world and paying tax, they become more right wing than
Ian Duncan Smith.

On the matter of arts/politics... I like to keep them
seperate. Tony Blair's music sucks (although, I don't like
his politics either :P - just using his as an example as he
plays); in a similar way, I think a lot of artists (not just
musicians) politics are ridiculosly idealistic and in no way
pragmatic. Doesn't stop me enjoying their art though...

Similarly I don't write people off as friends because they
have even diametrically opposed religious or political
beliefs to myself. I don't take it seriously enough to say,
"I won't be mates with you, commie scum."


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-14 14:51 [#01033430]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01033421



excuse me, but using your vote to balance out other people's
votes for the reasons you mentioned is just as dumb.



 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-14 14:51 [#01033433]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Co-existence: #01028952 | Show recordbag



OMFG! she actually said that??


 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2004-01-14 14:53 [#01033438]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01033421



No I don`t think anything less of you. My dad`s a Labour
policitian. But i refuse to join the Labour party because I
don`t agree with their policies. All this New Labour
nonsense. If Labour did genuinly represent the common
worker, which is how they got their name then I would
consider voting for them.

But I refuse to vote tory because I disagree strongly with
their policies aswell. I have met some really nice Tories
through my dad. Like this Lord who was a tory peer. Nice
chap. Everyone is only human.

To be honest, British politics isn`t in a good state. Tony
Blair is a liar. The tories are a mess.

It`s no wonder that voter apathy is so rife these days.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-14 14:54 [#01033442]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag




another quote:

"We need to execute people like John Walker in order to
physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that
they can be killed too! Other wise they will turn out to be
out right traitors"


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-14 14:56 [#01033448]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01033430 | Show recordbag



No, it's funny and bloody minded. Like I said, I don't take
politics that seriously. If I did, I'd be out there
starting a new party that had policies I completely agreed
on, rather than just a few I like and some other ones that
are better than the alternatives proposed.

And if anyone feels like ripping into anything I said in my
answer to mc_303, feel free. I won't ban you for calling me
a Tory wanker. I fully expected some sort of backlash...
that's what you get for being honest :)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-14 15:01 [#01033459]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to mc_303_beatz: #01033438 | Show recordbag



Yes, definately. I used to work as a labourer and a gardener
so I've got lots of proper "worker" mates. I feel sorry that
there's not really any party to represent their interests
currently in the country...

And yes, you meet all sorts of people who you'd never guess
their politics from their appeareance or behaviour. Most
people who see the way I usually dress assume I'm a liberal
student and caught quite off guard if politics comes up :).

Today I was talking with a counciller (not about
politics...)and I assumed he was a Tory. Turns out he's our
local labour counciller.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-14 15:06 [#01033468]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



COULTER: I take the biblical idea. God gave us the earth.

PETER FENN (Democratic strategist): Oh, OK.

COULTER: We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the
trees.

FENN: This is a great idea.

COULTER: God says, "Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's
yours."

FENN: Terrific. We're Americans, so we should consume as
much of the earth's resources...

COULTER: Yes! Yes.

I really hope she is in no position of power because she
really scares me


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-14 15:09 [#01033473]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and
convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about
locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We
carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's
war. And this is war."

yes, these are real quotes

be afraid... be very afraid


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-14 15:13 [#01033483]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Don't worry Pantalaimon... she's just a tory lawyer who is a
well known figure in right wing politics- she doesn't have
any real signicicant power base. Her constant defence of
Bush isn't indicative of her being in his inner circle or
anything... just that she hates people focusing on attacking
his character rather than engaging in serious political
debate.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-14 15:14 [#01033486]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01033483 | Show recordbag



* and she only has 145 "fans" worldwide (source: her
website...) That's about under a 100th of RDJ and Co. ;)


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-14 15:17 [#01033491]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01033448



..?

"oh man, I just made a funny vote! oh wait till I tell you
about this one.. it's a corker!!"


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-14 15:19 [#01033493]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"If those kids had been carrying guns they would have gunned
down this one [child] gunman. ... Don't pray. Learn to use
guns."

does she actually believe in the things she says? Has she
got a history of mental illness?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-14 15:19 [#01033494]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01033483



I don't think it's very strange people attack him on his
character, simply because there isn't anything else to
attack. he will not go into political debate with anyone. he
sure did not get to power because of his political idea's.

if this man can break his way into the white house, what is
the point of serious political debate? it's all means
nothing.


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-01-14 15:21 [#01033496]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



so we should consume as
much of the earth's resources...

COULTER: Yes! Yes.

now thats funny :D



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-14 15:23 [#01033499]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01033491 | Show recordbag



Obviously, you take politics seriously and my "childish"
view is offensive to you. I'd argue that you're the one with
the problem. There's not a lot of point in getting really
het up about politics as unless you're going to become
someone like Hitler, Ghandi or Bush for that matter, your
political achievements will, for all the effort you put into
them, amount to diddly squat in the great scheme of things.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-14 15:25 [#01033506]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"Limp-Wristed Liberal Traitor Of the Day Award"

apparently she gives out this award for anyone who gives her
book a bad review


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-14 15:25 [#01033507]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to hobbes: #01033496 | Show recordbag



she sounds insane, does she not?


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-01-14 15:28 [#01033508]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



absolutely , i had a really good laugh :D (pantalaimon)


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-01-14 15:30 [#01033510]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



though when you think about it she s NOT very funny
......brrrrr


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-01-14 16:36 [#01033641]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



how about some generalizing? wink wink.

some people who are ideologues, liberal or conservative,
seem to uncritically accept any data or evidence that
supports their positions.

someone says wifebeating picks up during the superbowl,
liberals fall all over themselves to reproduce the "fact."

someone says there are more native americans today than
there were 300 years ago, conservatives put their hands
together and say "of course!"

it occurs to me, however, that liberals tend to err on the
side of giving people the benefit of the doubt.
conservatives seem focused on dividing people into "winners"
and "losers," and tend to often expect the worst of people.

people are drawn to a firebrand like anne coulter because
she seems smart (maybe she is), and she's clever enough to
be able to produce what seems on the surface an easy answer
for any issue, an answer that taps into certain american
prejudices and presumptions and then implies a black and
white conclusion. for example, the belief that a democratic
republic is a superior form of government, leads to the
assumption that the united states government is above
reproach, and the end (promoting similar governments)
justifies any means (warfare, subversion of socialist
governments, terrorism).



 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-01-14 16:37 [#01033643]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



there's also the easy answer approach. someone hit you?
hit them back! the only other option coulter would
acknowledge in this scenario is to back down, and appear
weak. someone hates you? hate them back! again, coulter's
only acknowledged option would be to "make them love you,"
(delivered in a simpering, whiny voice for effect).

one of the best tools for determining the agenda of an
individual is to ask, does this person use their rhetoric to
divide people against each other, or work to find common
ground and goals? does this person fan the flames of
conflict, or work towards resolution?

anne coulter is one product of the great lie that the
peaceful are weak, and that the only way to assert strength
is through attack.

anyone remember rush limbaugh?



 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2004-01-14 16:47 [#01033667]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular | Followup to plaidzebra: #01033643



excellent articulate point.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-01-15 01:04 [#01034147]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Ceri: I'm not being funny here but I can't see a distinction
between the Tories and New Labour. Hence the increasingly
low turnout in elections.

Also, people don't vote Labour because they've been brought
up to do so. If you look at the south Wales valleys for
example. These places had an organised trade union movement
and people ACTIVELY participated in politics at one time. It
was in their interests to fight for better pay and
conditions and this logic fed into memebership of the Labour
Party.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-01-15 06:29 [#01034396]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



Good point Plaid, but some folks can't come to common terms.
Some folks want too much and won't compromise unless forced
to. It's a sad fact. This can be said for all sides and
factions.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-01-15 12:04 [#01034814]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



bogala, and yet people are designed to change. therefore
there is always hope. true, we may see this civilization
destroyed first, but the story of humanity is only
beginning...


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2004-01-15 21:00 [#01035410]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker



blah blah blah. i fucking hate politics! the more you know,
the less you know. i'm really just sick of it all. damn,
it's so frustrating. all these people with diametrically
opposed views all knowing they're right. what's a
person to do?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-16 16:34 [#01036902]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01033499



one could argue that people like Hitler or Bush could come
to power for a great part because people do not take
politics seriously.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-01-16 16:38 [#01036904]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01033499



oh and I do not take offense to your choices, Ceri. it's
your vote.

but it just seems the wrong place to try to be 'funny'. an
ironic vote - pointless on all levels, but foremost on the
funny level.


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-01-16 16:58 [#01036938]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



She is an inflamatory cunt a la Rush Limbaugh. The reason
liberals dont have these types of bombastic cheerleaders is
because nobody would pay any attention to them and they
would go away. Meanwhile conservatives prop up these
hate-mongers because they say the things every
skeevy-hearted conservative wishes they could say, but dont
have the balls to. Why? Because they know they are wrong.
They know that their views are inherintly self-serving and
superficial.

The sad part is that in America anyway, the Republican
party only serves the richest top ten percent of the
population and still manages to win elections by
brainwashing fools with delusions of grandeur or aspirations
of greatness into thinking that they will share with them.
Its the rich white boy's club that all the racist,
small-dicked, homophobic mommy-lovers want in on.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-16 17:50 [#01037018]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01036904 | Show recordbag



If there was a "serious" alternative, I'd vote for them.
However, the conservatives have three policies
(universities, speed cameras, national speed limit) that
are:
a) Relevant to me
b) Sensible
and perhaps most importantly,
c) so minor in the grand scheme of things, that they will
have a good chance of actually being implemented should they
get in.

No other party (that has even a marginal chance of success)
has anything to offer that begins to match those (sorry
state of affairs, eh?). Seems like a good reason to vote for
them to me.


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-01-16 17:55 [#01037026]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



That's it?

You base you politics on speed cameras? you an old lady?
incorrigble pedestrian?

education i can understand, but there has to be more going
on in parliment that that. Seems like i might try to give
the labor boys a boost as they might have the grass-roots
base to get something as radical as a national speed limit
passed.

quit being so fucking English!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-16 18:01 [#01037054]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to godataloss: #01037026 | Show recordbag



Your politics and laws are completely fucked. You're in no
position to criticise ours.

"education i can understand, but there has to be more going

on in parliment that that."

No- there is nothing going on in parliment that is currently
more relevant to me.


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-01-16 18:07 [#01037089]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



If I understand England's politics, they are just as fucked
as Mr Blair seems to be Bush's little bee-yatch!

NO?


 


Messageboard index