 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)big ...and 513 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614124 Today 3 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
its a great record. that is all i have to say on the matter. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
disc one, track three. disc two, track eight. lovely. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
probably his most classical release classical meaning cult music |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
when it comes to different styles of ambient: may be. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
there are no tracktitles on the booklet ; how can u guys know the names of the track ? i mean, i know it's written in the discog, but where does those titles come from ? anyway i'm listening to "rhubarb" right now and it's beautiful |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
It all depends on what you are currently listening to a lot as to what the best album is. Everyone likes something else. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i like it, it's like a sleeping pill |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I haven't heard this one (never been as much into Aphex as much as some others), but I can't get into SAW I. Is that one of those albums where you "had to be there" and the influence would be lost on someone just hearing it now, or have I just not listened enough? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
beautiful album - really captures the soul of rdj and is a demonstration of his musical ability and diversity.. stone in focus could make me cry. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i have yet to hear something like this |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
People saying it's boring is funny. When this album cam eout everything made by aphex was called ambient. There was no idm. This was a really unique album for the time. still is. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Of course it is his best album. As it stands now, in 50 years, this is the one he'll be remembered for. We are long overdue a third volume. Question is, is Aphex brave enough to do it? Personally, I think it beats even Eno's best work. The comparison with 76:14 is utterly disingenuous. As much as I like 76:14, it is just a well-crafted, commercially-oriented tribute to Vangelis and The Orb, and cannot compare to this beguiling and totally original work. Lesser artists like Robert Rich should not even be mentioned in the same paragraph. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well... I didnt feel like listening to this one in the last days... but it is something I have to do if I want to complete my trip throughout all my aphex discography I am usually lazy to start with it, but once I start I assure you I listen to the whole album all the way through cd1+cd2 I just started so this will take me a few hours I remember I had to re-buy this one cos cd2 broke in my first copy... now I have two of them but with just one cd2 about the music: glorious its a shame really that stone in focus isnt here I also dont understand hy some of the us versions dont have one of the tracks in here. so the vinyl with stone in focus has 25 tracks this regular release has 24 and the american version only has 23 why these things happen? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it was good at the time it was made i suppose, but personally i like many other ambient albums better to this oone. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
listening to cd2 now... blue clax isreally haunting (all te album is... but this is a great begining for second half) I remember reading the lord of the rings eveyrnight with this music it was incredible experience |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hi I changed keyboard... but its gonna be a pin in the ass... cos I use two diferent pc, and now I will have to take this keyboard any time i CHANGE |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
fuck I mistook the thread there |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
lol |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
