matrix 3 = "the one" to suck really bad | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
DADONCK
w M w
...and 230 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 11
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
matrix 3 = "the one" to suck really bad
 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-11-02 11:02 [#00930373]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Murray: #00930370



not tha cool...i havent finished watching the 1st part
yet...and i started like 2 years ago...getting close to an
end tho


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-11-02 11:03 [#00930375]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



oh well, at least i KNOW the return of the king wil be
excellent.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-11-02 11:04 [#00930376]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i havent seen any of that either...i been away


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-02 11:12 [#00930381]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00930369



no that would have been a blatant 13th floor rip off. Not
that the entire film isn't one big rip off of others
anyway...


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-02 11:18 [#00930387]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



could someone post a direct link? I must be monumentally
dense but I can't find it.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 11:22 [#00930392]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to TonyFish: #00930387



come on... open the page, use 'Find' and type in 'matrix'..


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-11-02 11:27 [#00930395]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



christ!
HAHAHAHAHA


 

offline nanotech from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2003-11-02 11:33 [#00930404]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00930332



any movie that's a 2 hr comercial is a horrible movie in my
book.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2003-11-02 11:38 [#00930409]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



they want your cash. they don't care how bad their film it
is.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2003-11-02 11:39 [#00930410]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



the third act is always bad, rotk not counting because its
one large movie.
i mean, return of the jedi, alien 3, leprechaun 3:
leprechaun goes to vegas, and now matrix revolutions.
tainting a perfectly good trilogy.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2003-11-02 11:39 [#00930412]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



oh wait, nevermind, the matrix isn't a good trilogy.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2003-11-02 11:41 [#00930414]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



Pffff... i didn't even like the 1st one, never mind the 2nd.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2003-11-02 11:42 [#00930417]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



films as trilogies is a huge trend for the movie industry
these days. i'm starting to find it a little annoying.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-11-02 11:46 [#00930422]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i wonder why is it becoming a trend...people you should be
bothered with, not movie industry


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-11-02 12:21 [#00930451]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #00930369



fleetmouse : that is one very good point you have there

neo using his powers outside the matrix is really the lamest
deus ex machina ever when that spoiler is true


 

offline D-Steak from Kansas City, Mo. (United States) on 2003-11-02 12:24 [#00930456]
Points: 1376 Status: Regular



i want to read it so bad dammit.....

ok im gonna read it.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-11-02 12:28 [#00930458]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #00930451



Deus ex machina, hmmmm... interesting choice of words in
this context...

Is it possible that all the reviewers so far have missed a
few subtle hints in the movie? Hints that point to a much
darker possibility underlying the seemingly cheerful finale?


 

offline D-Steak from Kansas City, Mo. (United States) on 2003-11-02 12:31 [#00930459]
Points: 1376 Status: Regular



ill rent it


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-11-02 14:03 [#00930537]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i'm glad they didn't decide to make zion another level of
the matrix. there would be really no way to tie the movie
up nicely. it'd be the same kind of cop out as if neo just
woke up, and the audience never knew if it was a dream or
not. the whole movie would've pretty much been pointless.

i'll be disappointed if the acting really is as horrible as
aint-it-cool made it out to be, but the ending doesn't sound
like the worst thing ever to me.

i mean, i was kinda torn between whether or not i even
considered the machines 'bad guys' or not. i mean, if
you've seen the animatrix the machines actually seem more
logical/good than the humans. it was us who attacked them,
they wanted to live peacefully the whole time. it'd be
kinda hard to be happy if the humans ended up destroying the
machines... and a bit of a letdown if the machines crushed
the humans, even though that'd kinda have been cool if it
ended up that way.

this seems like a very acceptible ending to me... of course
it kinda sounds like the w. bros. may've fucked it up in the
execution.


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 14:07 [#00930543]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



the ending as told by that dude just can't be true. the
other guy didn't even mention it. +my unconceived son could
write a better plot.
it better be a joke, although i had already made up my mind
i'm not falling for the hype again.


 

offline Smyrma from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2003-11-02 14:08 [#00930546]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker



I didn't really like the plot in the second one but the
action was sweet.

This ending is really shitty, but I'll still see it.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-11-02 14:09 [#00930547]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #00930537



YOU LEAVE PHILIPPE ALONE BAD MAN


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-11-02 14:16 [#00930560]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i don't understand why people bash the plot so much. i
mean, i can totally understand the argument that the acting
is deliberate and stiff, and that the special effects were
way over hyped, and those types of arguments. but, really
the basic outline of the plot is pretty damn nice if you ask
me. wtf kind of crazy expectations to people have for these
films?

it certainly isn't the most mind expanding story ever told
by the human race or anything, but damn, it's really not
that bad. it's simple enough to be understood on some level
by the masses, but has enough twists and obsure references
to keep the geeks talking about it for years.

what kind of plot would it take to impress you guys?

*waits for the inevitable "a good one" response*


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-11-02 14:17 [#00930562]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00930547



it's too late man. he's already in the van. he's doomed.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-11-02 14:17 [#00930563]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



a good one


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-11-02 14:20 [#00930568]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



lol


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-11-02 14:20 [#00930569]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



just kidding. i agree. thats exactly how I feel about it.

I didnt read this thread... i skimmed through, and skipped
what looked like story line.

i dont want to be spoilered. I just want to state that I
wish that it would end: the machines kill the humans, and
the cycle repeats, like the architect says has 4 times
already.

yes.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-11-02 14:25 [#00930577]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



i think that anyone can make anything sound stupid if they
are motivated to do so. for each of my favorite films there
are individuals who exclaim that it's the worst film they've
ever seen (eg "2001" "brazil" "waking life" "city of lost
children"). i'm certainly not inclined to trust the rabid
hyperbole of a stranger on aicn. i already know there are
things i will like and dislike about revolutions, but i will
likely see it anyway.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 14:29 [#00930583]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Zeus: #00930563



you are right though..

plotwise hardly anything happens in Reloaded. it's just
action scene after boring action scene, until the last ten
minutes when you get 10 minutes of exposition rammed down
your throat - phew! just made it before the end of the
film.

to me that is the biggest problem with Reloaded - not the
acting, it isn't good, but well, it is an action flick. no,
the big problem is the structure of the film, the pacing,
how the plot is handled. the film feels like it is in
stasis, kept in a coma.
and the argument that it is the middle-part of a trilogy
does not work, I'm afraid. they released it as a film, so I
will see it as a film - if I had to see it otherwise, they'd
better had made one really long film. the whole dramatical
arc of the film is non-existant or at least very badly
mangled. each film, whether it is part of a series or not,
has it's own dramatical arc.
another large flaw in the film is that I just didn't care -
why should I care about Neo?


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2003-11-02 14:29 [#00930585]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #00930577 | Show recordbag



but their all good or excelent films you mentioned...


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-11-02 14:53 [#00930619]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



my point is, the only way to find out if a movie is
excellent to you is to see it. i don't think that people
are "wrong" for not liking these films. i disliked "jerry
mcguire" and "titanic," but they are widely regarded as
excellent films. not to initiate another redundant "quality
as subjective aesthetic perception" discussion...


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-11-02 15:07 [#00930639]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Matrix was mediocre but ok however there was too much hype.
Matrix 2 sucked major and 3 well I ain't gonna be falled a
third time. Like the Matrix I always knew they was a reality
beneath the bull and it was that its a second rate series.
Over and out.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-11-02 15:12 [#00930644]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



plaidzebra,

I disagree. I don't want to watch Matrix Revolutions. Matrix
2 was dreadful absolute rot. Granted the actions scenes were
good but quite frankly they were pretty OTT as well. I
didn't watch T3 and I vowed not to because the original
actors weren't present so that was it really. Likewise if
they brought out another Alien movie and Signorey Weaver
wasn't in it I wouldn't watch it unless it had absolutely
exceptional reviews.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-11-02 15:26 [#00930661]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i think alot of people over look the fact that the matrix is
just a big budget B-Movie.

Thats all it is.

Take it as such: not seriously. Its just a movie. Over the
top at times, but in an entertaining way.

Its not meant to be an oscar winning drama, or an
intellectual statement. It just uses those elements from
time to time.

And just because there are people that take it seriously and
think its deep and philisophical... that shouldnt put you
off from the movie. It should just put you off of the
person. This is just a pop culture movie. Take it as one.


 

offline Cokey Romano from Australia on 2003-11-02 16:04 [#00930688]
Points: 223 Status: Addict



The Cosby Show is stupid.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 16:06 [#00930691]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Zeus: #00930661



but then it still is a bad big budget film.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-11-02 16:08 [#00930692]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



but b-movies are supposed to be bad

thats why they are bmovies

but its bad in an enjoyable way... as long as you realize
the fact that its not meant to be some dramatic oscar
winner.



 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 16:08 [#00930693]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00930661



yes but the movie takes itself so seriously... no humour
whatsoever. even worse than star wars, in that respect
(well, in every other respect, too, come to think of it)


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-11-02 16:09 [#00930695]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Netlon Sentinel: #00930693



yes, but I think that just makes it even better!

it takes itself so seriously... but Im pretty sure it was
meant to be that way... like, over the top

I dunno.

Fuckit. I like it. Those are my reasons.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 16:11 [#00930701]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Zeus: #00930692



b-movies traditionally have a non-star cast and a tiny
budget..

this is not a b-movie..


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 16:11 [#00930702]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00930695



well in that case their intension backfired, too, cause i
(at least) have to take it seriously thru a lack of having
any idea what else to do with the plot :(


 

offline Cokey Romano from Australia on 2003-11-02 16:12 [#00930703]
Points: 223 Status: Addict



It wasn't so serious in the first film.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-11-02 16:13 [#00930705]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Yeah exactamondo. But the fact that it takes itself so
seriously just had me in stitches. Unintentially there are
so many funny scenes in Matrix 2. Ha ha ha dumb bastards
they probably didn't even realise it with all its mumbo
jumbo spiritual 'the one' fucking rubbish.

Did anyone see the cast of Matrix 3 this morning on T4?
Jeeze didn't they look a sour bunch, ha ha. Obviously they
know Matrix 3 is gonna bomb big time. Lol.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-11-02 16:13 [#00930707]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



meh.

MEH.


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 16:15 [#00930709]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker



still, there's laurence fishburne, the one actor who can
save this film (note the pun).

or can he?

nah


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2003-11-02 16:17 [#00930715]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



i saw only the first one once and i'll leave it at that.



 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 16:21 [#00930722]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Netlon Sentinel: #00930709



seeing as he has some of the most pompous dialogue ever (at
least in the first two films), I doubt it very, very much.


 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-11-02 16:25 [#00930729]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #00930722



it fitted him in the first film. in the second film he was
forced into a role, as they'd have us believe, but the whole
transition thing is everything but convincing, indeed. i
felt bad watching reloaded, realizing i didn't care for any
of these characters. it'll be no different in revolutions.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-11-02 16:26 [#00930730]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



qrter,

Yeah I agree. Hey thumbs up for the Ripley avatar. :-) me
likes Ripley.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-11-02 16:30 [#00930736]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



fleetmouse:

considering how many times the W brothers crap on about the
"post-modern" condition, it wouldn't be surprising if "the
real" ending was a gloomy one ... what cheese though.


 


Messageboard index