Define Talent... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 78 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Define Talent...
 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:26 [#00918837]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



yeah, its just that somethign comes to you faster.

and i agree: i think if someone who wasnt necessarily
"talented" painted a picture a little every day, and really
focused, no reason they couldnt paint something just as good
if not better than a "talented" aritst who painted a
painting every week or something.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:27 [#00918838]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



agreed ceri.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-10-26 05:27 [#00918839]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #00918835



right but who is saying that bob is not gona be as good as
vbill ? its just a matter of time


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:27 [#00918840]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



talent evolves through honing of skill.

it exposes itself.

and like i said, everyone has a ceiling.


 

offline uzim on 2003-10-26 05:31 [#00918849]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



"Therefore, singing well or painting great art is a
talent, and playing an instrument is a skill."


> i don't agree...
you need to practice with your singing and painting too, and
playing an instrument well is easier for some persons than
for some others.


 

offline uzim on 2003-10-26 05:32 [#00918851]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



at least, i think so. : )


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 05:51 [#00918881]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00918835



Bill would be more skilled, I think


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-10-26 06:01 [#00918901]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918881 | Show recordbag



...but his skills came from his innate talent for the
guitar!


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-10-26 07:25 [#00918955]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



having talent and no talent is the difference in being able
to play off the sheet perfectly and being able to play that
AND make it alive (which means, make it sound like it moves,
like it has a spark, an extra layer).

have you never heard the difference between a skilled
musician and a talented musician? it's like black-and-white
and full colour.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 07:26 [#00918957]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-26 07:40 [#00918967]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918631 | Show recordbag



haven't you posted something like this before?


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-26 07:50 [#00918971]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



having a good voice does not make a person musically
talented. duh.

Are you trying to justify you listening to Craig David and
Gareth Gates?


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 07:52 [#00918972]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #00918967



Not that I am aware.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-10-26 10:06 [#00919054]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



ive always thought of talent as practise and passion, you
can lose it without the latter


 


Messageboard index