|
|
Zombiekev
from Ardmore (United States) on 2003-07-07 12:16 [#00769594]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker
|
|
i find her attractive
|
|
xceque
on 2003-07-07 12:17 [#00769595]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
If he's teased one out at age 103 he's a lucky bastard. And probably in need of an ambulance about now.
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2003-07-07 12:18 [#00769598]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to spoonz: #00769577
|
|
shit.. i tought i was the youngest around after they banned flappypants :s
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-07 12:18 [#00769599]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00769551
|
|
well it's not rright forr them picturres to be available.
i'm not a prrude, i'm all forr porrn, but i rreally don't think it's rright in the least forr girrls orr lads forr that matterr being used at such a young age. it makes me sick.
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2003-07-07 12:18 [#00769600]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
if you're 12 its ok...if you're older you're a pervert - nothing wrong with this tho
|
|
wilcoooo
from Sydney (Belgium) on 2003-07-07 12:21 [#00769603]
Points: 794 Status: Regular | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00769599
|
|
agreed
|
|
vamason
from Zigomatic v17 (United States) on 2003-07-07 13:39 [#00769704]
Points: 132 Status: Regular
|
|
those pictures are just wrong... she's f'ing young as hell... she doesn't even have breasts yet... i was truly disturbed by it... sometimes i worry i'm a pervert though... i'm 17 and i found a girl who had the face and behavior of a 13 or 14 (MAYBE and immature 15)-year-old, yet she seemed mature in all other areas, if you catch my drift... kinda creeped me out
|
|
aperson
from Brentwood, TN (United States) on 2003-07-07 13:44 [#00769712]
Points: 1134 Status: Lurker
|
|
If they're old enough to pee they're old enough for me!
|
|
TonePu5her
from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 14:11 [#00769762]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular
|
|
I fantisize over younger girls,but thats as far as it goes. I don't see no harm in it. Although I would NEVER watch underage porn.
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 14:17 [#00769776]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
my brother is 13 and he looks at 13 year old porn, i dont think its wrong
|
|
TonePu5her
from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 14:24 [#00769788]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular
|
|
I think its wrong because the girls in the porn aren't old enough to decide wether its a right thing to do.
Its a moral thing.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-07 14:25 [#00769794]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00769776
|
|
wherre the hell does he get 13 yearr old porrn? it's illegal forr it to even be at his disposal.
|
|
Job a boj
from Land of the Lost Timezone! (Canada) on 2003-07-07 14:29 [#00769800]
Points: 498 Status: Regular
|
|
Those girls are a bit too young. What sickens me is the intentions behind those poses. I'm sorry but the people that took those pictures took them for nasty reasons.
I think its ok to admire their looks, sure they can look cute, but when a 13 year old is posed with her legs spread opean and a little pair of underwear on, what the hell am i (the viewer) susposed to think?
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 14:30 [#00769804]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
i meant he looks at the kind of stuff you guys are linking. not real 13 year old porn...geez
dont get me wrong i think this stuff is awful but im just saying who cares if he's looking at it. hes 13
|
|
DJ Xammax
from not America on 2003-07-07 14:30 [#00769806]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00769776
|
|
:|
I was round at my mates while he was letting his 11 (at the time) year old brother and his 9 year old (I think) cousin look at porn. They found it hilarious of course, immature to such things, or anything for that matter, so it wasn't as bad, but....really it was jes' fucked up to the bone.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-07 14:32 [#00769809]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00769804
|
|
haha o rrite.
yeah that's fine, and prretty norrmal. i mean 13 yearr olds have g/f's and b/f's etc...
unless you werre me.
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 14:33 [#00769812]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
you friend is a bad man, the kind you find in sewers
|
|
xceque
on 2003-07-07 14:39 [#00769826]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
The fact that the girls are 12 or 13 doesn't make it 'wrong'. (Though I want to add a word before 'wrong' but can't think what it should be: maybe 'ethically' or 'morally' but they don't seem right)
The rules of society; of civilisation determine what is right and wrong from a moral standpoint. The law decides what's right and wrong from a legal standpoint and the two don't always tally. Then there's the phsyical reality.
Say a TV news item tells of a 14 year old girl made pregnant by her 14 year old boyfriend. Social services get involved, and the public go 'tsk, in this day and age, kids today' etc, and roll their eyes.
A 25 year old man has a sexual relationship with a 14 year old girl and he is charged with having illegal sex with a minor and sent to prison. The public go nuts and brand the guy a paedophile.
Which is wrong? From a phsycial viewpoint there's nothing wrong with either. Both people involved in either case are capable of being mature enough to handle it and both are capable of being parents. The girl can be physically able to bear children with no ill effects.
Today's society says that an adult having sexual relations with a minor is illegal though, so from a legal standpoint it's wrong. The law sets the age limits and consequences.
From a moral standpoint it's also wrong simply because society has grown with these rules. People have come to accept it as wrong.
Now... where it should be wrong is where the girl/boy is too young to make their own informed and mature judgement on any actions they may be involved in. But it varies from person to person. Which is why the law stepped in with a standard age.
I'm not sure where I'm going with this... I'm just rambling.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-07 14:42 [#00769832]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
'I'm just rambling.'
yes, yes you werre, but i rread it all and took it in.
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 14:43 [#00769833]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
girl/boy hehe
|
|
TonePu5her
from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 14:48 [#00769843]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular | Followup to xceque: #00769826
|
|
I totaly agree exellent post.
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-07 14:53 [#00769853]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to aquagak: #00769812
|
|
offtopic: dude, how 's your xltronic photo-wall coming along? or don't you do that anymore? it was a real nice idea i tell ya.. i'd love to see more members on that thing (and the doubles and fakes erased :) )
ontopic: to avoid all risks of being caught watching underaged porn do what i do, only watch 65+ porn :)
or wait.. maybe this is horror rather than porn, i don't know
i don't know much :P btw i didn't think the girl in the initial post was that hot, cute yes. but as many others said the intend of those pics is wrong
verdict: guilty, 10 yrs jail for this pervert no j/k of course.. it's a difficult topic imo
|
|
DJ Xammax
from not America on 2003-07-07 14:55 [#00769858]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker
|
|
We're all going to hell.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-07 14:59 [#00769868]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
you hit 11 orr 12 and therre is no going back, hell it is.
all adults have a darrk side.
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 15:01 [#00769872]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
Morton: im having trouble with my hosts but as soon as i get that sorted ill post the newest version
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-07 15:16 [#00769887]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to aquagak: #00769872
|
|
cool :) thx
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2003-07-07 15:45 [#00769929]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
Link section
Eeew!!!
Megan 13 years old karen 9 years old Vanessa 12 years old Sammy 7 years old
Nigga please!!!
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-07 15:51 [#00769938]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
in my firrst post, i was serrious. i thought someone had linked porrn. i was not joking orr making a point. i shit myself.
|
|
Loogie
from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 16:09 [#00769963]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker
|
|
be careful. a good friend of mine is due to appear in a Crown Court in August for casually browsing similar websites. I've only heard his side of the story though.
If he has to do time it will fuck his life up good and proper. I shit you not.
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2003-07-07 16:11 [#00769969]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Loogie: #00769963
|
|
your friend should get that lawyer that cleared del naja
for real, UK seem to be really strict about this things...i hope we dont get that far
|
|
Monoid
from one source all things depend on 2003-07-07 16:46 [#00770061]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Loogie: #00769963
|
|
Well if you actually sign up for one of these sites, you are clearly a tool
|
|
Loogie
from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 16:50 [#00770075]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #00770061
|
|
maybe. i don't think it's a good idea to casually bounce urls around here incase someone's curiousity gets the better of them and they end up in real trouble.
|
|
Smyrma
from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2003-07-07 16:55 [#00770084]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker
|
|
a true prosti-tot
|
|
jiggalo bob
on 2003-07-07 16:56 [#00770089]
Points: 52 Status: Regular
|
|
i think that site was wrong :(
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-07-07 17:05 [#00770110]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular
|
|
for the record, i'd bet a large sum of money that these girls are over 18... it's just another strand of the porn industry... finding underdeveloped girls to placate the sexual fantasies of one demographic or another...
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-07 17:07 [#00770112]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to DeadEight: #00770110
|
|
well she's got friggin' little tits for a 18 year old
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-07 17:08 [#00770113]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to Morton: #00770112
|
|
i mean, she has none
|
|
Smyrma
from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2003-07-07 17:08 [#00770116]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker
|
|
Seriously though, my opinion is that you can think about whatever you want when you jerk off, as long as you don't do anything about it. Hey, if thinking about goats gets you hot, go for it, but don't go fucking any goats.
|
|
corngrower
from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2003-07-07 17:24 [#00770156]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker
|
|
Those of you who think those sites are horrible and child pornography obviously don't know what child pornography is. There are much, much worse sites than that. Most of the sites like the one linked here are young girls trying to become real models, not porn slaves. They don't know that old men are masturbating to them, they're hoping a moldeling agency is out there. Many of them are at the age modeling agencies are looking for for fresh young look, right before the primary modeling age. There is a fine line at play, but as long as they're covering there breast and genitals, it's not child porn.
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-07-07 17:26 [#00770158]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to corngrower: #00770156
|
|
agreed.
|
|
jiggalo bob
on 2003-07-07 17:34 [#00770171]
Points: 52 Status: Regular
|
|
she has weird eyebrows
|
|
revpersona
from Plainfield (United States) on 2003-07-07 18:07 [#00770203]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker
|
|
All I can say is HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ahhh, I never knew people would market such lil girls like that, too funny!!
|
|
nene
from United States on 2003-07-07 18:31 [#00770217]
Points: 1475 Status: Lurker
|
|
see I don't have a problem being turned on by a girl that young and her little cheesecake photos, but I would never have sex with a girl that age. I would just feel like the biggest asshole in the world for it. what the hell would we talk about, teddy bears? besides I'm completely satisfied with full grown women.
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-07 18:41 [#00770227]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
i'd be more worried about the people who took the pictures. and let her take the pictures (legal guardians)
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-07 18:42 [#00770228]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
cause she's all like pulling her shit off like "I KNOW YOU WANT IT BUT IT'S YOUR TICKET TO JAIL"
|
|
OK
on 2003-07-07 18:43 [#00770230]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
there can be a 13 year old girl that just looks older and hot.. it'd be natural to "desire" her..
for example that true tere site.. that girl could pass for an 16-18 year old gal (on some pics)... and some of those pics she actually looks hot.
but the first one you posted the girl looks like a kid...
so it doesn't make you a pervert to like 13 year old girls.
you would be a pervert if you liked those girls because they are 13 year olds.
as if somehow the age turned you on.
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-07 21:01 [#00770308]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular
|
|
what exactly do you guys mean when you say "underage"? is it under 18 (or maybe 19), the legal "age of consent", and the age when they can be in porn legally?
cus if thats the case then liking girls younger than 18 or 19 certainly cant be considered sick... i mean there are some very hot 17 year olds who look like theycould be 20, and even if they look 17, 16, they can still be hot.. and girls can look like they are a couple years older or younger than they are when they develop faster or slower or whatever, so you cant draw a line at one year
btw i agree with a few ppl here who said even if they consider the girl pretty, they wouldn't want to have sex w/ her... and not for moral reasons.. its just like i really dont want to have sex with that body
(i mean the girls in those links)
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-07 21:04 [#00770309]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular
|
|
......and yeah some of those sites were pretty disturbing (the sites linked to the ones linked to in this thread)... those girls were obviously marketed for in a very sexual way, even the ones where they are obviously no where NEAR puberty
|
|
plaidzebra
from so long, xlt on 2003-07-07 23:55 [#00770354]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker
|
|
no one said that there weren't more explicit or abusive images available than these. yet consider that hardcore images are the result of a process by which these young girls are gradually inured to the idea of being photographed, receiving positive feedback, compliments, and phony promises of modeling careers, and then persuaded to participate in more explicit photos. whether the subject is aware of the insidious intent or not seems not too important. considering that much exploitation indeed begins "innocently," i think we should at every chance discourage people from trading in images that treat children as sexual objects.
of course we have a very complex issue at hand, all children are different and some develop a sexual identity at a relatively young age. fantasizing about sex with a young girl is not a crime. while we depend on legal definitions like "age of consent" to protect children, we recognize that such definitions are flawed in some situations.
but consider doing some research on how pedophile's develop, and how they move from fantasy, to pornography, to molestation. how they seek to rationalize their behavior, and how they seek validation from their online peers to justify and reinforce their behavior.
perhaps more important than knowing what child pornography "is", is where child pornography "comes from."
|
|
nocturne
from Montreal (Canada) on 2003-07-07 23:56 [#00770355]
Points: 207 Status: Lurker
|
|
That Laurie looks about 11 or 12, I'd say. What kind of whack parents would allow their daughter to do that shit?!
|
|
Messageboard index
|