Am I a pervert ? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 288 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613452
Today 5
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Am I a pervert ?
 

offline Zombiekev from Ardmore (United States) on 2003-07-07 12:16 [#00769594]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker



i find her attractive


 

offline xceque on 2003-07-07 12:17 [#00769595]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



If he's teased one out at age 103 he's a lucky bastard. And
probably in need of an ambulance about now.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-07-07 12:18 [#00769598]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to spoonz: #00769577



shit.. i tought i was the youngest around after they banned
flappypants :s


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-07-07 12:18 [#00769599]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00769551



well it's not rright forr them picturres to be available.

i'm not a prrude, i'm all forr porrn, but i rreally don't
think it's rright in the least forr girrls orr lads forr
that matterr being used at such a young age. it makes me
sick.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-07-07 12:18 [#00769600]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



if you're 12 its ok...if you're older you're a pervert -
nothing wrong with this tho


 

offline wilcoooo from Sydney (Belgium) on 2003-07-07 12:21 [#00769603]
Points: 794 Status: Regular | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00769599



agreed


 

offline vamason from Zigomatic v17 (United States) on 2003-07-07 13:39 [#00769704]
Points: 132 Status: Regular



those pictures are just wrong... she's f'ing young as
hell... she doesn't even have breasts yet... i was truly
disturbed by it... sometimes i worry i'm a pervert though...
i'm 17 and i found a girl who had the face and behavior of a
13 or 14 (MAYBE and immature 15)-year-old, yet she seemed
mature in all other areas, if you catch my drift... kinda
creeped me out


 

offline aperson from Brentwood, TN (United States) on 2003-07-07 13:44 [#00769712]
Points: 1134 Status: Lurker



If they're old enough to pee they're old enough for me!


 

offline TonePu5her from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 14:11 [#00769762]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular



I fantisize over younger girls,but thats as far as it goes.
I don't see no harm in it.
Although I would NEVER watch underage porn.


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 14:17 [#00769776]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



my brother is 13 and he looks at 13 year old porn, i dont
think its wrong


 

offline TonePu5her from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 14:24 [#00769788]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular



I think its wrong because the girls in the porn aren't old
enough to decide wether its a right thing to do.

Its a moral thing.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-07-07 14:25 [#00769794]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00769776



wherre the hell does he get 13 yearr old porrn? it's illegal
forr it to even be at his disposal.


 

offline Job a boj from Land of the Lost Timezone! (Canada) on 2003-07-07 14:29 [#00769800]
Points: 498 Status: Regular



Those girls are a bit too young. What sickens me is the
intentions behind those poses. I'm sorry but the people that
took those pictures took them for nasty reasons.

I think its ok to admire their looks, sure they can look
cute, but when a 13 year old is posed with her legs spread
opean and a little pair of underwear on, what the hell am i
(the viewer) susposed to think?


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 14:30 [#00769804]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



i meant he looks at the kind of stuff you guys are linking.
not real 13 year old porn...geez

dont get me wrong i think this stuff is awful but im just
saying who cares if he's looking at it. hes 13


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-07-07 14:30 [#00769806]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00769776



:|

I was round at my mates while he was letting his 11 (at the
time) year old brother and his 9 year old (I think) cousin
look at porn. They found it hilarious of course, immature to
such things, or anything for that matter, so it wasn't as
bad, but....really it was jes' fucked up to the bone.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-07-07 14:32 [#00769809]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00769804



haha o rrite.

yeah that's fine, and prretty norrmal. i mean 13 yearr olds
have g/f's and b/f's etc...

unless you werre me.


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 14:33 [#00769812]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



you friend is a bad man, the kind you find in sewers


 

offline xceque on 2003-07-07 14:39 [#00769826]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



The fact that the girls are 12 or 13 doesn't make it
'wrong'. (Though I want to add a word before 'wrong' but
can't think what it should be: maybe 'ethically' or
'morally' but they don't seem right)

The rules of society; of civilisation determine what
is right and wrong from a moral standpoint. The law decides
what's right and wrong from a legal standpoint and the two
don't always tally. Then there's the phsyical reality.

Say a TV news item tells of a 14 year old girl made pregnant
by her 14 year old boyfriend. Social services get involved,
and the public go 'tsk, in this day and age, kids today'
etc, and roll their eyes.

A 25 year old man has a sexual relationship with a 14 year
old girl and he is charged with having illegal sex with a
minor and sent to prison. The public go nuts and brand the
guy a paedophile.

Which is wrong? From a phsycial viewpoint there's nothing
wrong with either. Both people involved in either case are
capable of being mature enough to handle it and both
are capable of being parents. The girl can be
physically able to bear children with no ill effects.

Today's society says that an adult having sexual relations
with a minor is illegal though, so from a legal standpoint
it's wrong. The law sets the age limits and consequences.

From a moral standpoint it's also wrong simply because
society has grown with these rules. People have come to
accept it as wrong.

Now... where it should be wrong is where the girl/boy
is too young to make their own informed and mature judgement
on any actions they may be involved in. But it varies from
person to person. Which is why the law stepped in with a
standard age.

I'm not sure where I'm going with this... I'm just rambling.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-07-07 14:42 [#00769832]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



'I'm just rambling.'

yes, yes you werre, but i rread it all and took it in.


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 14:43 [#00769833]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



girl/boy hehe


 

offline TonePu5her from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 14:48 [#00769843]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular | Followup to xceque: #00769826



I totaly agree exellent post.


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-07 14:53 [#00769853]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to aquagak: #00769812



offtopic: dude, how 's your xltronic photo-wall coming
along? or don't you do that anymore? it was a real nice idea
i tell ya.. i'd love to see more members on that thing (and
the doubles and fakes erased :) )

ontopic: to avoid all risks of being caught watching
underaged porn do what i do, only watch 65+ porn :)
or wait.. maybe this is horror rather than porn, i don't
know
i don't know much :P
btw i didn't think the girl in the initial post was that
hot, cute yes. but as many others said the intend of those
pics is wrong
verdict: guilty, 10 yrs jail for this pervert
no j/k of course.. it's a difficult topic imo


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-07-07 14:55 [#00769858]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



We're all going to hell.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-07-07 14:59 [#00769868]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



you hit 11 orr 12 and therre is no going back, hell it is.

all adults have a darrk side.


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-07-07 15:01 [#00769872]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



Morton: im having trouble with my hosts but as soon as i get
that sorted ill post the newest version


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-07 15:16 [#00769887]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to aquagak: #00769872



cool :) thx


 

offline Sido Dyas from a computer on 2003-07-07 15:45 [#00769929]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker



Link section

Eeew!!!

Megan 13 years old
karen 9 years old
Vanessa 12 years old
Sammy 7 years old

Nigga please!!!



 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-07-07 15:51 [#00769938]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



in my firrst post, i was serrious. i thought someone had
linked porrn. i was not joking orr making a point. i shit
myself.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 16:09 [#00769963]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



be careful.
a good friend of mine is due to appear in a Crown Court in
August for casually browsing similar websites. I've only
heard his side of the story though.
If he has to do time it will fuck his life up good and
proper. I shit you not.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-07-07 16:11 [#00769969]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Loogie: #00769963



your friend should get that lawyer that cleared del naja

for real, UK seem to be really strict about this things...i
hope we dont get that far


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-07-07 16:46 [#00770061]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Loogie: #00769963



Well if you actually sign up for one of these sites, you are
clearly a tool


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-07 16:50 [#00770075]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #00770061



maybe.
i don't think it's a good idea to casually bounce urls
around here incase someone's curiousity gets the better of
them and they end up in real trouble.


 

offline Smyrma from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2003-07-07 16:55 [#00770084]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker



a true prosti-tot


 

offline jiggalo bob on 2003-07-07 16:56 [#00770089]
Points: 52 Status: Regular



i think that site was wrong :(


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-07-07 17:05 [#00770110]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



for the record, i'd bet a large sum of money that these
girls are over 18... it's just another strand of the porn
industry... finding underdeveloped girls to placate the
sexual fantasies of one demographic or another...


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-07 17:07 [#00770112]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to DeadEight: #00770110



well she's got friggin' little tits for a 18 year old


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-07 17:08 [#00770113]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to Morton: #00770112



i mean, she has none


 

offline Smyrma from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2003-07-07 17:08 [#00770116]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker



Seriously though, my opinion is that you can think about
whatever you want when you jerk off, as long as you don't do
anything about it. Hey, if thinking about goats gets you
hot, go for it, but don't go fucking any goats.


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2003-07-07 17:24 [#00770156]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker



Those of you who think those sites are horrible and child
pornography obviously don't know what child pornography is.
There are much, much worse sites than that. Most of the
sites like the one linked here are young girls trying to
become real models, not porn slaves. They don't know that
old men are masturbating to them, they're hoping a moldeling
agency is out there. Many of them are at the age modeling
agencies are looking for for fresh young look, right before
the primary modeling age. There is a fine line at play, but
as long as they're covering there breast and genitals, it's
not child porn.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-07-07 17:26 [#00770158]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to corngrower: #00770156



agreed.


 

offline jiggalo bob on 2003-07-07 17:34 [#00770171]
Points: 52 Status: Regular



she has weird eyebrows


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2003-07-07 18:07 [#00770203]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker



All I can say is HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ahhh, I never knew people would market such lil girls like
that, too funny!!


 

offline nene from United States on 2003-07-07 18:31 [#00770217]
Points: 1475 Status: Lurker



see I don't have a problem being turned on by a girl that
young and her little cheesecake photos, but I would never
have sex with a girl that age. I would just feel like the
biggest asshole in the world for it. what the hell would we
talk about, teddy bears? besides I'm completely satisfied
with full grown women.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-07 18:41 [#00770227]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i'd be more worried about the people who took the pictures.
and let her take the pictures (legal guardians)


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-07 18:42 [#00770228]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



cause she's all like pulling her shit off like "I KNOW YOU
WANT IT BUT IT'S YOUR TICKET TO JAIL"


 

offline OK on 2003-07-07 18:43 [#00770230]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



there can be a 13 year old girl that just looks older and
hot.. it'd be natural to "desire" her..

for example that true tere site.. that girl could pass for
an 16-18 year old gal (on some pics)... and some of those
pics she actually looks hot.

but the first one you posted the girl looks like a kid...

so it doesn't make you a pervert to like 13 year old girls.

you would be a pervert if you liked those girls because they
are 13 year olds.
as if somehow the age turned you on.



 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-07 21:01 [#00770308]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



what exactly do you guys mean when you say "underage"?
is it under 18 (or maybe 19), the legal "age of consent",
and the age when they can be in porn legally?

cus if thats the case then liking girls younger than 18 or
19 certainly cant be considered sick... i mean there are
some very hot 17 year olds who look like theycould be 20,
and even if they look 17, 16, they can still be hot.. and
girls can look like they are a couple years older or younger
than they are when they develop faster or slower or
whatever, so you cant draw a line at one year

btw i agree with a few ppl here who said even if they
consider the girl pretty, they wouldn't want to have sex w/
her... and not for moral reasons.. its just like i really
dont want to have sex with that body
(i mean the girls in those links)


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-07 21:04 [#00770309]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



......and yeah some of those sites were pretty disturbing
(the sites linked to the ones linked to in this thread)...
those girls were obviously marketed for in a very sexual
way, even the ones where they are obviously no where NEAR
puberty


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-07-07 23:55 [#00770354]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



no one said that there weren't more explicit or abusive
images available than these. yet consider that hardcore
images are the result of a process by which these young
girls are gradually inured to the idea of being
photographed, receiving positive feedback, compliments, and
phony promises of modeling careers, and then persuaded to
participate in more explicit photos. whether the subject is
aware of the insidious intent or not seems not too
important. considering that much exploitation indeed begins
"innocently," i think we should at every chance discourage
people from trading in images that treat children as sexual
objects.

of course we have a very complex issue at hand, all children
are different and some develop a sexual identity at a
relatively young age. fantasizing about sex with a young
girl is not a crime. while we depend on legal definitions
like "age of consent" to protect children, we recognize that
such definitions are flawed in some situations.

but consider doing some research on how pedophile's develop,
and how they move from fantasy, to pornography, to
molestation. how they seek to rationalize their behavior,
and how they seek validation from their online peers to
justify and reinforce their behavior.

perhaps more important than knowing what child pornography
"is", is where child pornography "comes from."




 

offline nocturne from Montreal (Canada) on 2003-07-07 23:56 [#00770355]
Points: 207 Status: Lurker



That Laurie looks about 11 or 12, I'd say. What kind of
whack parents would allow their daughter to do that shit?!


 


Messageboard index