 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 308 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613477 Today 3 Topics 127503 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well i started with ep7, which scared me away for a while. with confield, i think the melodies are actually in the beats and rhythms, its more of an exercise in texture. i don't think its great, but its good enough. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i understand everything. i created it i created confield as a test it seperates teh people who know quality from the people who have a self-perception of an ideally original individual. you are all the konstrukt's of the twelve. never forget that. you have seperated yourselves into these two categories and beyond quite nicely and i thank you for your participance in this little experiment. now if you'll excuse me i must get back to my latest 'identity'>knell. RDJ aka AFX aka tom jenkins AKA squarepusher AKA autechre AKA god. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
stop it, you guys are going to drive me insane. have you ever heard pan sonic? merzbow? sawII??? melody is not a prerquisite for making music. it's an option. all of music is noise. why not take it to a purer form? why not make music purely out of noise. it seems natural. somtimes melody can be a distraction when you're trying to make communicate with sounds. so eliminate it! it's not always necessary. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Hmm, SAWII is ALL melody. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
mm... have you not listened to it in a while? there's some noise tracks. [while listening to it] track 11 on disc one. on disc 2- track 4, track 9, and track 10 (arguable I suppose) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I prefer melody, that's mainly what I look for in a song... but it's always nice to go off and try something else. Confield is freakin' unique... I do miss their pretty synth stuff from Amber and Incubabula, though. Nice melodies, they're definitely capable of some more. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
my only advice would be to leave the album alone for at least a month, better if two, and then listen to it again. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
never herd it.... sounds like i am missing out |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Or NOT, depending on whose side you're on. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
for all you pholks who think ae is soooo radical and cutting edge i invite you to step into the time machine and go back 7 years or so to when i was listening to this new and cutting edge 'musik' phenomenon called noise. it's been doen to death, and to be honest i have no idea how i listened to that rubbish for two years? noise, jazz, and classical were all i listened to. noise is so old and now it's returned to 'kewl' kutür with the likes of ae. bollocks. they are doing nothing at all even close to the quality of 'noise' that came out in the early to mid 90s. jus the same, it was a response to popp culture and a really lame one at that. if one is to listen to the natural sounds, as opposed to the fabricated, i'd rather listen to rain on my roof thank you very much. and to the boarder dude>you aren't missing a thing! MWA HA HHA HAHAH DDD |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah...or try people like morton subotnick...they were doing similar things in the 60's |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
so you're saying we shouldn't listen to ae cause it's all been done before? i give up |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yeah, I guess that's what they're saying. skodt - can you give us some recommendations for those of us who like Confield and would like more of the same... I checked out but which artist(s) should you start with? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Noise may have been done before, but melody has been done MUCH more. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
When a noise is more effective than a melody I see no reason not to use it... It's the endresult that counts, not the ingredients |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"they are doing nothing at all even close to the quality of 'noise' that came out in the early to mid 90s. " such as: *insert artist names here*? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
skodt...you alive during the Futurism Art movement in Italy duing the first deade of last century?... I guess not.... Read the Manifestos issued then and you'll see exactly what a huge part noise played in that movement.... The Art of Noises, by Luigi Russolo Published as a booklet July 1, 1913. The Painting of Sounds, Noises, and Smells, by Carlo Carrà August 11, 1913. And you wondered where The Art of Noise got their name from..... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Cheers for the cool link Jand. I remember reading about these crazy cats a few years ago. YOu wonder how they did it. I think even Autechre get a rough ride today, imagine what it must have been like a century ago. People like Russolo are an inspiration. (he also came from portogruaro in the Veneto!) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
