STOP!!!!!!!!!! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
-crazone
...and 334 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613462
Today 5
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
STOP!!!!!!!!!!
 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-19 14:56 [#00274823]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to core: #00274820



hahahaha.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 14:56 [#00274827]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



meho i don't understand why you have this attitude.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-19 14:57 [#00274828]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



it's a rip-off sytem, mate: ripping off is inbuilt whenever
you have to deal with manufacturing/ packaging/
distribution.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-19 14:58 [#00274830]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to core: #00274827



And I'm sorry if my attitude offends you, it was not meant
to do it, I have nothing against you personally. I'm just a
system-hater in every sense.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 14:59 [#00274831]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



not really. do you think we manufacture LP's out of thin
air? the record company not only has to pay for
materials/packaging/artwork/mastering etc etc but also we
have to pay staff so they can pay their rent!



 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:02 [#00274835]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to core: #00274831 | Show recordbag



what is the place of labels in a digital world, core?...

Without manufacturing/packaging/artwork...they seem kinda
out-of-date....



 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:04 [#00274836]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



so how do we pay the artists to make music full-time then?


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-19 15:05 [#00274838]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to core: #00274831



Core: do you think I am stupid? Fair enough if you do,
because I probably often sound stupid, but even so: I am
aware of all that and this is why I am against the industry
in general and music industry in particular: having to boost
your business in order to sustain your existence is bad for
the art the business is about. It is the same for small as
for big labels. The whole political-economy system is
exploitative, it is inherent, it is built-in.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-06-19 15:06 [#00274839]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to core: #00274831



Core, you've got it all arse about tits. Those who work for
the record companies, the artists and us the consumers are
all getting severly arse-raped by the record co's. They get
rich, or even if they don't get rich, they make a profit
from the efforts of the workers and artists. Without you
they would be up shit creek without an effin paddle.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-06-19 15:07 [#00274840]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to core: #00274836



How much would an album cost if it was distributed as MP3s
on the internet?


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-19 15:07 [#00274841]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to core: #00274836



But what is this making-music-full-time nonsense now? You
make it sound like a fucking 9-5 job, Core. I thought I was
clear enough about it yesterday: those needing to make music
will continue to do so until their physical destruction,
regardless of the conditions.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:08 [#00274843]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



meho i agree with your points in principle, but from my
point of view your argument doesn't have any relevance to
the level of the industry that i work in.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-19 15:09 [#00274845]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



its time for chnage then.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-19 15:10 [#00274847]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



chnage*

change


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:10 [#00274848]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



the artists i have worked with, many of whom are no doubt in
your collections, would never have created the output they
have if they were also holding down day-jobs.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:10 [#00274849]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



and that includes the great rdj.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-06-19 15:12 [#00274852]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to core: #00274843



But small record companies do not exist in isolation. what
happens when a minor company starts to make more profit?
Will it share it with everyone by paying the artist more,
and the worker more and reducing the price of CDs? Will they
knackers. They'll keep it. Its the logic of capitalism and
its all pervasive.

And anyway I don't give shit because 'Livin On a Prayer' by
Bon Jovi has just come on the radio and my fist is in the
air and I love you all so much. Woooooo.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:14 [#00274859]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



sorry jonesy, but the artists get paid royalties, which is
directly proportionate to the number of sales.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-19 15:14 [#00274860]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



Some Bartok has appeared in my itunes and I hate you all
:o)


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-06-19 15:15 [#00274862]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to core: #00274849



What everyone is saying core......

The artists don't need a middle man like YOU the record
company (parasites) to pay them in this digital era. Soon
there will be a long overdue shift in power when people
download tracks they want + artwork etc bypassing you and
all the misc. costs holding up your business.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-06-19 15:15 [#00274863]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to core: #00274859



Are you considering to sell MP3s on the internet? If not,
why not?


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:17 [#00274864]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



jivverdicker, your message is both ill-informed and
unnecessarily abusive.

it seems to be a waste of time trying to explain the facts
here.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-06-19 15:17 [#00274867]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to jonesy: #00274852



Will they knackers!

hee hee


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-06-19 15:19 [#00274874]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



Please explain which bit is misinformed?

It's not intended to be abusive, I'm just stating facts, it
might be awkward for you to come to terms with them but
that's life...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-06-19 15:19 [#00274875]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to core: #00274859



What about your cut dude? Do you get a share of the profits?
Me no think so. Without someone like you do play your part
in the distribution chain then your label would make less
money or no money at all. Therefore you add value to the
product. Part of this contribution you make is taken from
you and the rest you recieve in wages. This is the basis of
wage labour and capitalist exploitation. I wouldn't
romanticise your employer just because they distribute music
you love.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-06-19 15:22 [#00274878]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Oh man! Kiss's 'Crazy Nights' is now on the radio. My fist
is once again raised and pumping (oo-err). I love you once
again. "The sun goes down like a bad, bad dream...they say
they can break you...if life is a radio turn it up to ten".


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:22 [#00274879]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to core: #00274864 | Show recordbag



I think jivver hit it on the head...like so many industries
are finding...

It's a different world now...things have moved on and you &
your industry are clinging to the way things worked
yesterday...



 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:23 [#00274880]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00274878 | Show recordbag



Doesn't your radio go up to 11?...you pauper!!...;)..



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-19 15:24 [#00274881]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to core: #00274843



Core: it infests all levels: how old are you? Do you
remember all those anti-CD campaigns raging on punk scene in
the late 80s, early 90s because of the fact that,
regardlless of which label puts a CD out, every single copy
means profit for those holding the copyright: even the most
anarchist of punk CD's contribute to Sony making more money.
It's the same with all other details in record
manufacturing/ distributing. Industry does not care about
art, it cares about profit. The less you have to deal with
it, the better. Of course, even using internet, we support
part of the industry: this should not be forgotten.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-19 15:26 [#00274882]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



With any luck the industry will change so much we will no
longer have to endure shit pop music. The majors will no
longer be able to sell tunes as everybody will be ripping
them the moment they get released. So no money will find its
way to them.

We can but dream!


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-06-19 15:30 [#00274891]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to jand: #00274880



What, like Spinal Tap's amps?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-06-19 15:34 [#00274900]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to jonesy: #00274891



Don't even look at my amp.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:40 [#00274913]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00274891 | Show recordbag



too right...all my kit goes up to eleven...

10 is for girls..;)..


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-06-19 15:48 [#00274934]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



File sharing networks are a classic example of
disruptive technology. This is a pretty good book if you have
interest in business and technology. It has a rather
pessimistic view on large companies' ability to adapt to new
trends. Based on what we've seen so far, it doesn't look
good for the record industry.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-19 15:49 [#00274936]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



BTW, I have about ten minutes left in the office, so if any
of you wants to argue with me some more, come ON!!!


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:50 [#00274937]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



i didn't expect so much hostility from fans of the music we
release

:-(


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-19 15:51 [#00274939]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



I already said I wanted to argue on another thread. You have
been hogging Jonsey for days now. It is my turn.


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-06-19 15:52 [#00274941]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



But goddamn it, none of these threads are ever going to
change anyone's opinion. File sharing is here to stay so get
used to it. Record company folks should stop whining, listen
to the consumer, and find other sources of revenue if they
can.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-19 15:54 [#00274945]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



Yup!

RDJ should only do live shows and make one of pieces for
those events.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 15:56 [#00274952]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to core: #00274937 | Show recordbag



core, it's not hostility...we're just telling you like it
is...

We all wanna find a way forward with this but all we get
from labels is "you are thieves" & "you are killing
music"...
we simply want debate...but all we get are legal threats...

Is your label looking into micro-payments or alternative
ways of generating income?...or simply hoping this all goes
away (which it so obviously won't)...


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-19 15:58 [#00274953]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Core: I hope i wasn't coming accross as hostile towards you
as you seem like a nice person. No personal harm meant,
mate. I am just against the industry and I AM NOT A FAN.

Quernstone: the girl made her choice, sorry, mate, you are
out.


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2002-06-19 17:13 [#00275073]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00274881



'Industry does not care about art, it cares about profit.'

That's not always true. There are several dedicated labels
that care more about the artwork and integrity of their
artists than the profit they produce for them...
Constellation for example, who harbor such bands as Godspeed
You Black Emperor! , Silver Mt. Zion, and Fly Pan Am among
others..
Take a look at this:
http://www.cstrecords.com/html/cowards.html


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-06-19 17:20 [#00275094]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to jand: #00274952



I think it's ironic (and sadly typical) that core did not
bother replying to jand's legitimate question.


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 17:20 [#00275095]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



well lettting people listen to music online does help record
sales i'm sure - all the record label websites i know have
mp3's real media and mixes on them of their releases as do
most online shops - so this arguement that downloading mp3's
from soulseek or audiogalaxy is helpful for hearing music
and learning about more artists/labels is rather silly - why
don't people visit the lqbel sites to hear music then decide
if they like it - rather than downloading illegal mp3's from
a server who is making money from advertising and at the
same time non accountable to anyone - let alone the general
public..
i don't really belive soulseek users are entirley inncent
,..
as for babajela - you need money to do things in my world
dear ..maybe in your world you can get it off your dad or
something ..but we live in a capitalist society and people
need money to survive.

the labels provide ample opportunites on their websites to
hear their releases, leasrn about their history and artists
and link to other sites - downloading stuff from illegal
sites has none of this ..


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-19 17:29 [#00275124]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular | Followup to jand: #00274752



jand - your figures are taken from big business figures -
the kind of recordings that chart - only chains have the
machines that measure sales - so alot of the music you buy
doesn't even register ..
also it is a fact that electronic music is the most
downlioaded on the internet .. the listeners are the most
computer literate and are themost likley to make music
themselves


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-20 01:07 [#00275945]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



inverted whale: i only didn't reply earlier as i had gone
offline, not because i was avoiding the question.

jand: yes of course we are looking into all the options now,
the way music is/can be distributed has obviously changed,
but nothing changes the hard facts that our label and many
others we work with are suffering at the moment, where the
larger majors who have artists like britney are basically
shrugging off the problem. the only losers (financially) so
far seem to be the small labels like us and the lesser-known
artists we support. it is a real phenomenon. you should
re-read the comments above by my esteemed friend,
astrid-gil-botn. he has certainly got a realistic
perspective on what we are experiencing.

ps no offence taken from the relevant parties above, don't
worry :-) it's quite frustrating however, to see comments
by some of you guys, who seem to otherwise be very decent
intelligent contributors, where you're saying things that
are clearly based on spurious myths and ill-informed
perceived 'net-wisdom'. i mean no offence when i say please
get some straight facts from people in the industry before
making sweeping comments about the 'greedy' intentions of
the labels who are providing you with so much excellent
music. this is nonsense.

finally, yes indeed it's a shame to see mr p trying to
retract his valid comments. perhaps we need more artists
with the conviction to stick up for themselves on this
issue.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-21 15:37 [#00278427]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



if any of you aspiring musicians out there are reading this,
it would be very interesting to read your opinions on this
subject both before AND after you get a recording deal...


 


Messageboard index