mind body question | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 109 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613474
Today 12
Topics 127502
  
 
Messageboard index
mind body question
 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-12 12:06 [#02350573]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to -crazone: #02350571



I am kinda feel consionsness around me, becouse if there
wasnt stuff around me I could not express myself as consious
being. We kinda just reflections of world around us.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2009-12-12 12:12 [#02350575]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02350573 | Show recordbag



So you got the feeling yourself is "bursting out of your
body to?" Just to be/and find your true "you" right?


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-12 12:21 [#02350576]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to -crazone: #02350575



"Yes" :D

I see that my counsiosnes is formed not by me but by outside
world it is looks obvious to me. For me consiosnes is not
material, therefore canot be experienced by sensory
equipment :)


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-12-12 12:23 [#02350577]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



there is an oval like window, on the left a transparent
nose, on the right a transparent nose, and on the bottom
part of an upper lip. i am conscious of air going in and
out, and sometimes i feel a bit of a twitch or a jumpy nerve
here or there.

in my mind is constant thought, constant analysis. very
often struggling or cognitive dissonance, but then
other times peace or peace of mind. sometimes i feel the
shekhinah, and other times i don't. sometimes my mind gives
sway to other things that are not the shekhinah. sometimes
they pretend to be, but other times they don't even bother.

sometimes i do not feel much of anything spiritual and am
just in the here and now. just me, four walls, trees
outside, sitting on a couch.


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-12 12:27 [#02350580]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #02350577



pls define whre IS your counsionsness


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-12-12 12:40 [#02350584]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



it is physical and non-physical, innit. the brain is like a
processor/receiver, but there is also an essence to you that
is not seen. i would say it is still within you, as much as
anything that is not material can be within something that
is. i cannot comprehend the place that it is,
since even my understanding of place is a bound by
a physical understanding of location, size, distance, etc.

The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound,
but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is
going.



 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-12 13:17 [#02350596]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #02350584



I feel the same


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2009-12-14 07:40 [#02350988]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #02350577 | Show recordbag



great detailed description of you experiencing yourself in
your body wich i recognize immediately. What therefore makes
the opportunity to go a little bit deeper into the question.
We, and others, have this same experiences thrue daily life
but that doesnt give an answer to my question: how do you
experience yourself in your mind or body? What makes
you you in your mind or body? I hope I made myself clear
now.


 

offline ladybug on 2009-12-14 07:57 [#02350989]
Points: 69 Status: Regular



i get groggy when i'm hungry


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-12-14 10:32 [#02351020]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



you can't experience yourself, it's impossible. you cannot
experience anything through thought, as thought contaminates
everything it touches with the past. without thought, you
wouldn't even come up with the concept.


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 10:38 [#02351024]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular



What is 'experiencing yourself'?


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 10:40 [#02351025]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular



I'm touching my arm. It's an experience of myself in a way.


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 12:57 [#02351074]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker



.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-12-14 13:38 [#02351097]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02351020



just to keep the discussion going, could you think of any
other experience other than in thought?

you could also say: "you cannot experience anything other
than
through thought".


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 13:44 [#02351104]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker



but thoughts is only complex combinations of neurons. I cant
believe that we are just some kind of grey mass it is
clearly we missing something.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-12-14 13:48 [#02351106]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02351074



'infinity meditation' ... i betcha some new ager leader
clenched his fist and shook it at the heavens for not being
first with such a name.


 

offline robbie_eleckt from time to time on 2009-12-14 13:55 [#02351110]
Points: 1401 Status: Lurker



i can hear myself
i think i'm a bit afraid




 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-12-14 13:57 [#02351112]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02351104



"thoughts is only complex combinations of neurons".

this too could be considered as (just) another thought.


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 13:58 [#02351117]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to AphexAcid: #02351106



sometimes you can see smart things in sort of stupid things,
if you search for answers. If you look for perfection you
always find imperfections.


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 14:02 [#02351120]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular



You bedtime thinkers know nothing!


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 14:06 [#02351122]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02351120



do you like this ! track? Kinda bad audio quality I gues it
was much beter...It is just guess.


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 14:09 [#02351123]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular | Followup to nightex: #02351122



That video changed me. It's really funny, as both my lizards
died as i was feeling my DNA awakening :(
Do you think maybe the lizards died and entered me?


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 14:16 [#02351129]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02351123



Yes they entered you. And they will be gone soon. Your DNA
now is very similar to infinity symbol becaouse of two
lizarts right and left liuzardz.


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 14:20 [#02351131]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular | Followup to nightex: #02351129



Have you ever been entered?


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-12-14 14:24 [#02351136]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



aargh, always this DNA crap. i get why they're all busy with
the 12th planet and the annunaki (and they all are), but all
this DNA babble just fell down from ... from heaven, i
suppose.

"sometimes you can see smart things in sort of stupid
things,
if you search for answers. If you look for perfection you
always find imperfections."

nightex, this is too cryptic for me. :D


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-12-14 14:25 [#02351138]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02351131



mr russel, you make it sound so dirty.


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 14:40 [#02351145]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02351131



I never encountered lizard who can enter me. You beter tell
me why they died?


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 14:45 [#02351149]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular



lizard flu i think.



 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 14:46 [#02351150]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular | Followup to nightex: #02351145



Do you know Mr Lizard?


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 14:50 [#02351154]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to AphexAcid: #02351136



"Forms" sometimes represent "forms" which can help you
construct other "forms". It is known as interpretation of
things happening around us, this is how from stupid forms or
things can be extracted useful information.

Do you ever seen pedant whos happy about things around him?
That is answer why perfection cant be reached. Becouse
perfectionalists are pedants :D


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 14:55 [#02351158]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02351150



:D :D :D...
cool.
Once I have lizard...


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-14 14:59 [#02351159]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker



You filled tv with lizardz :D


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-12-14 15:03 [#02351162]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



the soul : the body :: you : a car


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 15:07 [#02351163]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular



the soul : the body : my cock : cygnus :


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 15:07 [#02351164]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular | Followup to nightex: #02351158



Is it in lizard heaven?


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-12-14 15:24 [#02351174]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to AphexAcid: #02351097



you misunderstand mr lizarddd.

you may have had an "experience", but as soon as you label
the experience using thought as an instrument the experience
is contaminated and becomes false.



 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 15:28 [#02351180]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02351174



false?


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-12-14 15:30 [#02351182]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02351174



lollllllllll


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-12-14 16:30 [#02351215]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



false, twisted, perverted - comprende??


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 17:24 [#02351235]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02351215



*sigh*
Stop being a twat for a second and explain why the
experience is falsed by thought! Still, that's what we would
call experience. No? Are you speaking of memories?
You're trying to talk about a form of experience that can't
be experienced. Some new definition. I sense the BS fairy
paid a visit or two lately.



 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-12-14 17:55 [#02351252]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02351235



Compare yourself to an animal. If an animal touches a hot
plate it burns its paw, and memory alone tells it not to do
that again - they do not have a field of knowledge (thought)
to draw from and cannot analyse the "experience".

The case is the same for you, except any similar
"experience" a human has is immediately translated within
the framework of the knowledge you possess.

Yet that knowledge is wholly conditioned by your
environment, it's not YOUR knowledge. The thoughts are not
yours, they have been placed there - your brain works
mechanically like a computer, storing all the information
that is put in there from others from the day your are born.


That very conditioning falsifies your knowledge and
therefore perverts or falsifies your experience too.

That's what I mean when I have mentioned in previous threads
that thought is a contaminant - it immediately contaminates
every physical and psychological experience.

Without that experience you have no way of knowing who or
what you are - like an animal has no way of knowing what it
is, but don't pretend the knowledge you do have is complete,
it can never be complete, it is always limited and always
perverted in its own subtle way. You don't really
experiencing anything for as long as thought exists it
immediately brings about illusion, although obviously you
think you are experiencing it and you name it as an
experience for the sake of communication.


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 18:05 [#02351258]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular



So now it's not false but incomplete? You stand awefully
stern for someone so keen to point out we experience
nothing. Our mind does its best to try and make sense of
things. it's what you're doing, and you seem to have your
convictions. That's great but when you come to discuss it
with others, it's in a very unopen manner.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-12-14 18:14 [#02351263]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



It's false AND incomplete.

Anyway, I just figured out that you've only gone all crusty
because earlier I called you a poof in another thread.
Perhaps you don't understand my dry sense of humour.


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 18:17 [#02351265]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02351263



"I just figured out that you've only gone all crusty because
earlier I called you a poof "

Haha not at all. I mean it's not the first time we chat like
this.


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-12-14 18:17 [#02351266]
Points: 16057 Status: Regular



It's incompletely false!!


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-12-15 14:24 [#02351554]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02351174



What would you consider experience to be, without
conceptualisation?

You seem to imply that there are two kinds of experience:
ideation misinterpreted as being 'experienced', and
experience objectifed as thought.

Wouldn't you agree that the idea of conditioning only holds
sway as long as the notion of there being experience to be
conceptualised?

Without 'experience', as an idea, we can't experience having
thoughts, either.

Since the absence of conceptualisation is not conceivable,
as that would imply conceptualising, I don't see how,
conceptually, there could be two kinds of experience.

Nor "one", either, for that matter, since 'experience' is
conceivable, i.e. ideation.

I mean, just type in the word in a web search engine and
you'll probably get a couple of thousand search hits.

I don't disagree with your conclusions, though. I just want
to see where this discussion is going.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2009-12-16 00:14 [#02351731]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



The idea of a self in your body..how do you experience
you..I'm gonnn make myself more clear now: you can tell who
you are by just physical aspects..like a fat tummy...or
blond or black hear..the collour of your skin etc..but how
do you see (experience) you without the physical
aspects..and how do you know it's you? Where or what or how
do you reckon 'you'? Thought is just a part of you imo,
there's more then thought in you only..f.e. dreams or
feelings. Maybe 'you' is indeed just a couple of
neurons..but all these neuron connections together make
'you'..how do you reckon you from those connections? Etc..we
are goig the right way in this topic but still I've got no
answer that has satisfied me..


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2009-12-16 02:48 [#02351741]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to -crazone: #02351731



If you put aside physical aspects of you, you only could be
aware of nonphysical aspects of you. But you simply cant. We
can only guess what is realy happening when we are aweare
of ourselfs, when we are councious. Biologicaly what you
experience at the moment you are councious is certain
combinations responses of systems and automatic regulation
systems, which all together combine feeling of experience of
something. But we dont know for example how signals in our
brain coded and how they can be interpreted. Neurology is
wide science and there is much to discover. Maybe you feel
mising parts of puzle which are not discovered yet.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2009-12-16 06:35 [#02351754]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02351741 | Show recordbag



Oke and then tell me now how you experience you with the
physical aspects please.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-12-16 06:39 [#02351757]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



The physical eye does not know what it's looking at. In
other animals, the physical eye sees then memory brings
about an instinctive reaction, which is purely mechanical.

In humans, there is a longer delay. Thought goes one step
further and translates what the physical eye sees then gives
it some sort of meaning. It names this an "experience" and
files it as knowledge.

Yet everyone's thoughts and interpretations of what they see
are different depending on a wide variety of conditioning -
depending on what's been put in your 'computer'. Whatever
thought sees is not the truth; not the absolute; limited by
knowledge.

The act of the physical eye seeing something is FACT, the
interpretation FICTION. Now apply that to everything in your
life and you will realise that everything you call an
experience is fiction.


 


Messageboard index