Two Possible Realities | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
ijonspeches
...and 183 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614224
Today 6
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
Two Possible Realities
 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-28 20:49 [#00675368]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #00675155



thank you plaidzebra. i've been having trouble keeping my
words as straight forward and un-emotionally charged as
possible. your poetic understanding is a relief.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-28 20:51 [#00675372]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00675366



well, i am implying, but i make no claim to proof. i do
claim to be able to clearly illustrate why western thought
is based on an explicitly irrational notion.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-28 20:52 [#00675374]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00675372



not all of western though, but a crucial barrier within it.
we could go so far if this barrier would just crumble.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-04-28 21:47 [#00675432]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



"confucius and you are both dreams, and i who say you are
dreams am a dream myself. this is a paradox. tomorrow a
wise man may explain it; that tomorrow will not be for ten
thousand generations." chuang tse: II

jupitah, i'm glad to hear your appreciation.

the person who says, "i am totally awake," they are totally
asleep! -osho

we are here only to extend help to one another. we are each
of us facets upon the face of the same gem. when you deny
your brothers and sisters, you deny yourself. again, these
statements i offer only that those who suffer might learn
the relief.

I have never been contained except I made the prison. -Mary
Evans, actress
(1888-1976)

While we are asleep in this world, we are awake in another
one. -Salvador Dali


 

offline Glitch from New Zealand on 2003-04-28 22:59 [#00675504]
Points: 519 Status: Regular



the problem here lies in the belief that there is a singular
moment.. . this pertains to creation rather than evolution..
. things are allways a gradual build to the moment.. . its
not a matter of just switching it on.. . these are human
terms.. . which is all conceptual and not logical.. . any
singular moment may still be examined in stages.. . and the
smaller those stages become the larger that 'moment' begins
to seem.. . remembering that time is a gauge also invented
by humans to link these 'moments' together. ..

my writing is by now means fluid.. . I understand what Im
typing but may not be able to convey it to you.. .
nevermind. ..

try and look at conciousness in terms of a computer program
thats constantly running.. . and the user is not allways
aware of the program.. . ever wondered why some things go
unnoticed sometimes ? when the mind is ready and receptive
things will be unncovered.. . perhaps some of those things
were allways there also. ..


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-04-28 23:25 [#00675532]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



All things are concious on different levels.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-04-29 04:38 [#00675737]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Glitch: #00675504



the problem here lies in the belief that there is a
singular
moment.. . this pertains to creation rather than
evolution..
. things are allways a gradual build to the moment..


Would you describe the events of your life as a result of
gradual evolution or a series of turning points?


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-04-29 04:51 [#00675756]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #00675737



oh... I must just add that yeah I believe that there's a
reason for every cause...
Hmm... Hope you understand what I mean, when reading this
and the previous post.


 

offline Glitch from New Zealand on 2003-04-29 05:54 [#00675822]
Points: 519 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #00675737



key secret: thats all a matter of perspective isnt it.. .
those two things are essentially the same. ..

hmm.. . yes.. . cause and effect.. . this can be applied to
virtually everything.. . but it doesnt really help this
topic much.. . perhaps you had a usage I didnt understand ?


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-29 06:45 [#00675866]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker



With respect to the original question...

It has been shown in various experiments (all of which are
obviously subject to debate), that human conciousness is an
emergent property of the complexity of the human brain. This
tends to point to a continuum of conciousness. i.e. the more
complex the system (or brain) the 'more concious' it is.
This theory can be expanded and contracted to account for
the 'unexpected' behaviour of nearly all complex systems.
Including human society, ecosystems, ant colonies... etc
etc.

Did that make any sense? Its something that I have been
interested in since University.

Anyone read any Fijtof Capra? The Web of Life. The Toa of
Physics. Hidden connections.... all very interesting books
that look at the simlarities of systems, and what we can
learn from them.



 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-04-29 08:45 [#00676068]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Glitch: #00675822



Without "turning points" as I mentioned them, in a way;
there's just chaos...
now you get my point?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-29 09:23 [#00676135]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00675866



lucky psycho,

that's a contradiction. if consciousness is a product of
the brain then its development cannot be contiuous. In in
an individual, if the development or "complexification" of
consciousness is continuous then there is no starting point
and consciousness must have existed before the brain came to
be.

the brain is obviously the central focal volume of our
consciousness but there is nothing that points to
consciousness being "boxed" in the brain.

one could say that density of complexity mighty correscpond
with the coomplexity of consciousness, but where do you draw
the line, what system is not complex enough to be conscious?
it is continuous.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-04-29 10:12 [#00676219]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



i'd like to suggest that your brain is an interface of
consciousness, rather than the source of consciousness. as
an electrochemical organ, memories and sensations *can* be
caused to emerge through direct electric stimulation of the
brain. indeed, memory loss is associated with damage to
certain structures within the brain. nevertheless, the
brain is not a container into which the memories are
written. a brain cannot be "full," or run out of memory.
the brain can, and will, "run out of time." the brain is
the interface of consciousness with temporal phenomena, and
so we see temporal limits within the brain. within the
illusion of time and space, the brain is a tool of learning
whereby we experience directly the consequences of our
choices. we are expressed here for a purpose; the
opportunity for transformation.


 

offline jenf from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 10:16 [#00676225]
Points: 1062 Status: Lurker



three words: super string theory


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 10:20 [#00676230]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Jupitah, in your first hypothesis are you implying that
genetics (or physical assembly as you like to call it)
determines degree of consciousness?

Most of what we know about biology is based on theory as you
may already know. First, we assume that a central nervous
system is necessary to experience. The degree of brain
maturity defines the ability to allow memories, pain,
emotion, thought etc. Many creatures do not posess a brain,
or even a central nervous system (CNS). Many creatures,
insects for example, literally have a "bundle" of neurons
that are not regulated by any single specific body (e.g.
brain).
Many "lower" level creatures respond to their environment
via "chemotaxis" - their body automatically responds to
chemicals and other matter, both physical and non-physical
(e.g. light, water).

The problem with this theory - a few incredibly bizzare
cases of human brain abnormalities have thrown a very fat
wrench into years of theory. It seems that a VERY SMALL
number of human cases (less than 10 if I recall) have been
identified with merely a brain stem and no identifiable
brain - yet they function normally and are said to be above
average intelligence. (I can give you details if you
like).

Point being - we thought we had it figured out at one point.
Truth is, its all still theory. I personally agree with
your second hypothesis. (varying degrees of consciousness
and experience).

I like your style jupitah. It's nice to see somebody with
some very profound thoughts. :) Keep it up.


 

offline Glitch from New Zealand on 2003-04-29 10:21 [#00676232]
Points: 519 Status: Regular | Followup to jupitah: #00676135



why is the brain obviously the focal point of conciousness ?
could it not simply be a receiver ? what about the soul ? or
as I have learned.. . the energy body.. . the force
encompasing the physical body.. . this could very well be
the source of conciousness rather than the brain.. .
conciousness could also be a continuous thing.. . passed
down from mother to child as it were.. . if you yourself
cant pinpoint the moment you became concious of your
existence it could be very well be because you had yet to
notice your conciousness.. . it could be sitting there until
language had formed with which to discover it. ..


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 10:25 [#00676236]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



WOW!!! Alot of people have shared some excellent ideas! To
think I spent so much time on other forums listening to
little kids argue over Xbox and Playstation2 superiority ;)


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 10:32 [#00676247]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Glitch - I totally agree. My background has always been
science, so I tend to kind of stick to it. Have you ever
heard of kirilian (can't remember the spelling) photography?
This technique of energetic measurement might be the next
huge step in proving that "souls" exist. Although, in the
name of science, you may never see it published in an
academic journal.

THe more I research the subject, the more I begin to realize
that the brain might not be the house of consciousness.

Similarly, some philosophers have proposed that this
everyday state of awareness that we experience might be akin
to a higher level dream state. The degree to which a dream
appears real during sleep might be similar to our so called
"awake" life. There may be an even greater awakening beyond
this level of consciousness (call it enlightenment, nirvana,
heaven, another dimension etc.)


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-04-29 10:39 [#00676255]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



catharsis, i agree that the existence of functioning,
anencephalic individuals is fascinating. i read about an
individual in the uk just about 6-9 months ago with this,
"condition." no detectable brain tissue, but they are
actually functioning. with only spinal cord and brain
stem!?!? how frequently do the experts say, "here is our
theory, we excluded any anomalies because the theory can't
explain them"? we see the distant past as primitive and
ignorant, and our present as sophisticated and knowing.
it's humbling and spurring to realize how far we have to go.


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-04-29 10:41 [#00676256]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to jenf: #00676225



i saw a tv program about super string theory and the
existence of alternate realities

i cant even try and put it into a coherent sentence unless
i'm extremely wasted on drugs


 

offline Glitch from New Zealand on 2003-04-29 10:43 [#00676259]
Points: 519 Status: Regular | Followup to catharsis: #00676247



catharsis yes ! I have most definately heard of Kirlian
photography.. . what you want to do is pick yourself up a
book called "PSI : Psychic Discoveries Behind The Iron
Curtain" by Sheila Ostrander & Lynn Schroeder.. . it was
written back in the late 60's/early 70's by 2 american's
that went to russia to learn of their experiments.. . its
quite simply the most important book I have ever read.. . I
dont know how easy the book would be to find.. . I found
mine in an annual booksale we have here.. . my prints from
'76.. . but I think they have reprinted it more recently
than that.. . good luck. ..



 

offline jenf from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 10:43 [#00676260]
Points: 1062 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spacecadet: #00676256



oh but that's the ONLY and BEST way ;)
of course, that's a bias on my behalf.. haha


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 10:44 [#00676261]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



When I was young, I thought the "adults" had figured it out.
All those textbooks were scientific fact when I was
younger.

Now, I realize how much of the puzzle is missing, and the
more I know, the more I realize I don't know. Plaidzebra,
you couldn't have said it any better:

"we see the distant past as primitive and
ignorant, and our present as sophisticated and knowing.
it's humbling and spurring to realize how far we have to
go."

In 10 years, we'll realize how stupid we were....and so
on....and so on.... and so on............



 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-04-29 10:45 [#00676266]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



hehe expand yo miiiiind man

it's all i can talk about when im wasted

my mates tell me to shut up talking about ripples in
space/time


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 10:46 [#00676268]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Thanks Glitch. I'll be sure to check it out, and the string
theory.
You guys rock.


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-04-29 10:47 [#00676269]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



i'm sure i've figured out the meaning of life and how the
universe was born and what it all means

and then forgotten it strait away :)


 

offline jenf from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 10:47 [#00676271]
Points: 1062 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spacecadet: #00676266



well i dont think you should shut up!
whenever you feel that you have a need to express, whether
or not you think it might be useful, you should just write
it all down :)

it could be worth lots in the near future.. you never know
unless you try :)


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-04-29 10:49 [#00676275]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



hehehe yeah, i like having 'big fat chats' at an afterparty

i recon i should set up a microphone

make good samples for tunes!!!


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 11:17 [#00676328]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



HAA!!! My friends and I have always suggested that we
should record our discussions when stoned. I would assume
that they are either very profound or incredibly stupid ;)


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-04-29 11:30 [#00676349]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00676328



probly both


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-04-29 19:34 [#00677255]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



years ago, i had an extremely strange experience after
ingesting a large quantity of mushrooms (approximately 5
grams dried). unknown to me, my close friend was having the
same experience in the room next door. what occurred was
something we had not discussed or anticipated. we met each
other on the way to talk to the other, and as we freaked out
at each other, "oh my god!" "what the fuck just happened?"
"what's going on?" i started the tape recorder in the room.
for several minutes we discussed what had happened, and then
suddenly my friend said, "what are you talking about?" and
then proceeded to go amnesiac about the entire episode. he
would not believe me until i played him the tape. at the
time i did not understand what had happened at all, and was
totally unnerved by the experience, and worst of all,
unnerved by the tape confirming at least the subjective but
shared experience. so be careful what you tape! ; )


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-29 19:36 [#00677258]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



or what you swallow


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-29 21:17 [#00677394]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



mushrooms have a nasty habit of making my blood sugar
plummet. I can't even ingest 1 gram without having a
"passout" episode. About 20 - 30 minutes after ingestion, I
begin to get light headed and if I don't either sit down, or
get some sugar in me quick, I fall over.
5 grams might put me into hypoglycemic shock.....too bad,
probably be fun.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-04-29 22:45 [#00677459]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



if you are familiar with the literature, you are aware that
if you have correctly identified these mushrooms then you
are extremely unlikely to be injured by ingesting them.
these mushrooms have been used by humans for thousands of
years. nevertheless, you must be prepared to accept the
consequences of your choices.

catharsis- i've never read about mushrooms producing a drop
in blood sugar. i can't even imagine a mechanism by which
that would occur. if you don't mind, how many times has
this occurred? did you fast before consuming them? do any
other foods cause a similar response?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-29 23:08 [#00677474]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00676230



catharsis,

to be clear, my "possibility one" that i presented is not MY
hypothesis. it is A hypothesis.

my original purpose here was to demonstrate that this
hypothesis implies that consciousness is supernatural.

ironic isn't is? moderns/westerners denounce animism or
anything of the sort as belief in the supernatural, when the
opposite is true. so often i find that those who judge
others are actually making a statement about theirself, a
sort of fruedian slip (or maybe i use the term incorrectly).
how many of the megaphone weilding fundamentalists
condemning passing strangers as sinners were actually guilty
of all their accusations?

personally, i do not believe that anything is outside of
nature. of the many realms of existence that i've
experience, no matter how incredible or magical, none have
struck me as being disconnected with this one. i have no
reason to believe that magic is something that opposes the
forces of physical nature and i have no reason to believe
that consciousness is separate from nature. i have every
reason to believe that consciousness is nature. no
duality.

einstein said something along the lines of...

"one can see everything as miracle or nothing as miracle."

i think either understanding could be true. why you would
choose to experience life in absence of miracle i have no
idea!

i'm glad you found yourself here catharsis.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-29 23:21 [#00677494]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Glitch: #00676232



glitch, i didn't mean to imply that consciousness is the
brain or is limited to the brain. i simply meant that the
processes of conscoiusness are most explicitly manifest in
the brain.

i don't believe that the brain or physical reality is a
product of consciousness or the soul (here me out please!)
anymore than i believe that consciousness is a product of
the brain. either way implies dualism to me.

i believe that this that i am experiencing right now is the
current manifestation of my soul. my body is not separate
from my soul, not a mere product of my mind, but the current
state of my soul. my soul is not separate in anyway from
the spirit of my surroundings (that which is within my
awareness is a part of me) or the spirit of anything in
existence, yet my personal awareness unit is a condensation
of consiousness into this body and this life that i am. i
believe that we are continuous, flow into eachother, just as
mother to child as you say. complete continuity, yet
varying degrees of "consciousness density."


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-29 23:30 [#00677507]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #00677255



it seems that the weblike complex of our minds have
something to with our identity. i cannot be certain, but i
imagine that plants are less afflicted with the illusion of
a separation between their self and their surroundings. it
is as though they span the "natural" world with their body
as an identification anchor of sorts. and maybe it is that
in mystical and psychedelic states we take on a similar
quality of experience, keeping the body as an anchor though
less restricted by said illusion.

i have had similar empathic and telepathic occurences both
with psychedelics, cannabis and with musically, shamanically
enduced ecstasy. these are states that take us back to the
state before the consumption of the fruit of the tree of
knowledge. in our becoming hyper-aware of our selves we
forgot that we were separate from our body, the earth, the
universe.

PERFECT ANALOGY! imagine that your individual cells come to
realize they are individuals. in their process of
self-realization they forget about the harmony of the body
that they are a part of and so the body would become ill, go
to shit. that is the disharmony taking place here on
earth.

and now that we've rediscovered our body (this the
experience of oneness, no?) we can begin reharmonization.
but we can only directly reharmonize ourself and hope that
it spreads, in a resonant manner. i've known this for a
while now and finally i have the metaphor to comunicate it.


 

offline Glitch from New Zealand on 2003-04-30 00:13 [#00677558]
Points: 519 Status: Regular



yes.. . nice to see a blakeian point of view.. . the thing
that religion has done to stunt this understanding is to
seperate man from nature by saying that we are unique and
have a soul seperate from the body.. . but the body is
simply the extension of that soul. ..


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-30 03:24 [#00677732]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00677507



Jupitah - I like it... good metaphor.

I don't know if you've looked into complex systems theory,
but your metaphor is one that can be applied to all complex
systems. So when you say "that is the disharmony taking
place here on
earth." I think you are describing the problems that humans
are encountering (and causing) because we have forgotten
that the harmony of the system is dependant upon all parts
working together as a whole.

Maybe thats not exactly what you were saying, but I am very
keen to show people the similarities between what appear to
be fundamentally different things... e.g. conciousness,
society, ecology.... all complex systems that display very
similar traits. We are a very long way from understanding
how these systems work, but I think this will be the key to
understanding many of the unanswered questions... and more
importantly... should lead us into a more harmonious
existence.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-30 06:50 [#00677946]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Glitch: #00677558



yes, and it follows all bodies are extenion of a soul, be it
insect or star system... the whole (universal) body is the
whole universal soul manifest. nothing is without soul, or
as i have been phrasing it, nothing doesn't experience its
existence to some degree or quality.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-04-30 06:55 [#00677948]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



jupitah: from the birth of the number it was all downhill so
to speak (to refer to an earlier post you've made).

whilst it had huge pragmatic value in language and concepts
- it also gave an attractive and abstract way of dealing
with out selves, that was tempting to distinguish from
other/inferior uses of language ..


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-30 07:01 [#00677956]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00677732



the disharmnoy between us humans and the rest of the
parental planet is indeed what i am refering to.

and agree that these complex systems can be understood in
terms of similarities (if that is what you are saying) but
what i believe is fundamentally crucial before we are able
to make serious progress towards our re-alignment with the
local (earth) system is the reversal of our having forgotten
our true identity as the entire planet (and ultimately the
universal body). we must remember--not just you and i but
some critical mass or whatever it takes--that which we have
forgotten.

interestingly, the very thing that catalyzed the process of
our forgetting is the same thing we must use to remember.
it is our extremely out-of-the-moment, analytical mode of
consciousness. thought. when we took the fruit from the
tree we didn't realize the responsibility we were taking on,
but there's no turning back.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-04-30 07:03 [#00677957]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



birth of the number ~ birth of the abstract concept


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-30 07:04 [#00677959]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00677948



could you elaborate for me? how has the number given us the
means to "deal without selves"? how does language without
the conept of numbers differ from language with?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-30 07:05 [#00677962]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00677959



so was that the consumption of the fruit? the abstract?
the idea in general to be contemplated, out-of-the-moment?


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-04-30 07:08 [#00677966]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



well the abstract concept gave us the means to abstract
ourselves from ourselves (the mind from the body if you
like) ... and see things from a different perspective. it
wasn't just used for communication in a limited way anymore
.. it allowed the communication to be expressed in light of
an abstract and explicit concept, it allowed the mind the
dominate nature - which might tie in with your notion of
"out-of-moment" and analytic. ??

and to use your biblical analogy, the number was the bite of
the apple - there is indeed no going back .. :)


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-30 07:12 [#00677971]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00677966



yes, that is what i was going for.

and this resolves the issue of...

what is it precisely that makes us feel out of nature?
nature is harmonious system and it was our stumbling out of
harmony that brought about a need to distinguish.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-04-30 07:12 [#00677972]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



and by dominate i mean .. abstractly conceptualise.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-30 07:12 [#00677975]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



so when we feel the need to describe our actions as other
than natural, it is our recognition of having forgotten.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-30 07:13 [#00677977]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00677972



...and abuse, whether intended or not.


 


Messageboard index