The News | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
dariusgriffin
...and 369 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614082
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
The News
 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 15:36 [#02088089]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker



My whole life I avoided knowing anything about the news;
ie, the state of the outside world in terms of real events.
(I'm happy to know about science, writing, music.)

The past months I followed the news some. I think it's time
to stop again.
what
dem
fucks

Does anyone follow the news? I could only imagine doing so
if one were committed to feeling miserable all the time, or
if they just took it as purely, morbidly amusing.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2007-05-27 15:37 [#02088092]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Latter.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-05-27 15:41 [#02088099]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I try to keep up, but with my TV not working, it's getting
harder. I still read newspapers, though. I kind of feel it
should be a responsibility for people to keep up with the
news; ignorance changes nothing.

Maybe, one day, if you're sufficiently appalled, you may get
active..?


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 15:41 [#02088100]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #02088092



heh, that's how I was handling it.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-05-27 15:42 [#02088101]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #02088092 | Show recordbag



That's actually the Norwegian word for laughs (as a noun).


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 15:42 [#02088102]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02088099



I see, yes it could be a good motivator to be try and make a
positive mark on the world. Myself, I have other ways I'll
contribute to the world (science), I'm just going to ignore
this other shit as much as possible. Please don't drop
bombs on me or throw me in jail for no reason. Hopefully
naivete doesn't imply death.


 

offline goat boy on 2007-05-27 15:43 [#02088103]
Points: 48 Status: Regular



Let's all be morons and not watch or read the news!


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2007-05-27 15:44 [#02088105]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #02088102



what a shit attitude


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 15:45 [#02088107]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to Exaph: #02088105



why


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 15:46 [#02088108]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to goat boy: #02088103



those two do not correlate


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2007-05-27 15:50 [#02088111]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



i think its a selfish attitude. why cant you do both? how
can you effectively contribute to science without knowing
whats going on in the world?

the news does get on my nerves at times but i think its
important to know about what happens because theres less
fortunate people than you that could do with some help, e.g.
Darfur.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-05-27 15:53 [#02088114]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #02088102 | Show recordbag



As long as you're making an effort to contribute, I have no
problems (I hate stuff like the logician philosphers who
only do logics, and who do it just for its own sake and
"pure" mathematicians in the same vein. I'm not saying you
shouldn't do what you'd like, but I'm saying people with
education have an obligation to contribute, and to
actively strive to do so, not just babble on within their
own little sphere of highly specialised irrelevant
ramblings), but I'd still call it a bit irresponsible to
avoid the news.


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 15:55 [#02088116]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to Exaph: #02088111



Firstly, it's arrogant to assume that one knows what really
is good. I've frequently made the mistake of helping
someone only to realize it wasn't something they wanted.

Ignoring that though, yes there are cases like darfur.

I know I'm being flawed; the news makes me sad, though.
It's possible that ignoring it I'll do better science and
help others more.


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 15:57 [#02088118]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02088114



I'll agree with the accusation of irresponsibility. I am
trying to contribute in a way I see useful.

I don't see an obligation of those with education to do so,
however. What differentiates their moral obligations from
those of the un-educated?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-05-27 15:59 [#02088120]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #02088118 | Show recordbag



Ah, I was a bit unclear.. I didn't really mean that
uneducated people didn't have the obligation, I was
referring to what academics do in their research; the
obligation is to make your research a contribution, and not
some self-realisation project.


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 16:02 [#02088121]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02088120



but how can you determine such a thing!

For instance, for about 150 years prior to the advent of the
computer, mathematics went through a rigorous formalization,
culminating in formal logic and development thereof. People
may have considered this academic navel gazing (as compared
with 'real' developments like differential calculus), but
the existence of computers is completely dependent on these
advances!

Similarly, advanced number theory, which was a
'mathematician's plaything' for hundreds of years, is the
basis for cryptography!


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2007-05-27 16:03 [#02088122]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #02088116



yeah the news is pretty much always sad, isn't that just
life? couldn't that help your scientific quest though? -
inspire you to make it better in some way through science.


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-27 16:05 [#02088124]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to Exaph: #02088122



As I said to torbjorn (drunken mastash), it's hard to see
which direction to research. For instance, what if the best
possible thing I could do for darfur would be to design a
portable fusion reactor? what if that takes more than a
lifetime?

There are clearly bad things of course.. like army killbots.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2007-05-27 16:16 [#02088130]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #02088124



well maybe that isnt what darfur needs.. perhaps the design
of an awareness programme more effective than the news would
be in order.. even if it took more than a lifetime
you would have conceived it and started it.

if your not sure what to research then why dont you just
follow your heart?


 

offline uzim on 2007-05-27 16:18 [#02088133]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



i somewhat follow them, though i should probably pay more
attention to them...

for some reason, i'm finding it difficult sometimes to get
moved by terrible things happening to dozens of thousands of
people, whereas something terrible happening to one person
or a few persons can make me feel really sick. i guess it's
"normal", you can easily relate to a particular person, not
so much to a crowd, even less to a number... but i know it's
wrong.

i also find that, even though this thought may be even
wronger and more sickening, some situations (like in the
middle east) are so apparently hopeless and going wrong all
the time that i end up getting used to it and stopping
caring about it, no matter how horrible the situation there
is. i feel used to the world going wrong in a gazillion
different ways all the time and don't have much hope in
humanity in general, yet (or maybe because) i've never been
myself in big trouble.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-05-27 16:54 [#02088149]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #02088121 | Show recordbag



I'm talking about the motivation for the research, not the
research as such; as you say, you can't always determine
beforehand what the results of your research is going to be,
but the motivation shouldn't be purely masturbatory, but
rather to actually make a contribution. You believe you can
make a contribution by your research, you're not doing it
simply to satisfy your own desires.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-05-27 17:00 [#02088150]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02088149 | Show recordbag



Also, note that the contribution is non-specific; you
contribute to what you think is important, whether that's
political or scientific (though, if it is scientific, the
field should also kind of be something not geared only
towards itself. Like how certain analytical philosophers
seem to think). The main point I'm making is about the
attitude of researchers towards their research.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-05-27 17:10 [#02088155]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I read The Times, when I'm away with work. Occassionally
I'll read the local paper over my parents' house. I read
most issues of Private Eye. Sometimes I read Motorcycle News
(Newspaper covering motorbike news, rather than a magazine
format paper, bit tabloidy though).

I tend to view it as Ecnadniarb does and take it as a source
of amusement. I actually like Bush, because although he's
clearly a criminal fuckwit, at least he's entertaining to
watch. Same goes for Boris Johnson. Most politicians are
criminal fuckwits, but most aren't half as funny as that
pair.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-05-27 17:21 [#02088158]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02088155



Private Eye is great. I don't understand why it isn't more
popular.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-05-27 18:10 [#02088167]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I read the newspaper most days, but it's a bit too
Canadian-centric. Just like our TV stations, there's a
minimum amount of ''Canadian content'' that they have to
include, very annoying. Very boring and sober country.
Otherwise I like sites like digg, for better or worse. When
I read a news story, I immediately feel the need to read
what others have to say about it, informed and otherwise,
even if I'm not concerned about the original story. See what
other stories and subjects and arguments it breaks off into.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-05-28 06:03 [#02088267]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to dave_g: #02088158 | Show recordbag



I think most people aren't bright enough to get the humour
of it and/or aren't sufficiantly incensed at being lied to
by the people whose wages they pay (politicians and public
service officials) to get it solely for the exposes. The
recent NHS IT system thing they did should have been
front page news on a more widely read paper.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-05-28 06:28 [#02088285]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



Oops, it's 5:27 am. I better go to sleep or whatever that
thing is that humans normally do.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-05-28 06:37 [#02088293]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



Here is some news:
about 30 seconds ago I drank some apple juice


 

offline OK on 2007-05-28 10:24 [#02088336]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



i read the news. but it really doesn't matter, everything is
so manipulated nowadays anyway, if you want to contribute
just do your own thing live your life, vote and whatnot, try
to be happy.


 

offline sneakattack on 2007-05-29 04:13 [#02088587]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker



news

is

so

good


 


Messageboard index