|
|
Aesthetics
from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-02-17 03:54 [#02051421]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker
|
|
I never heard anything like this before on my headphones. LAZY_TITLE
Any other recommendations?
|
|
CovenantJohnson
from your bowels,waiting to escape on 2007-02-17 04:05 [#02051426]
Points: 30 Status: Regular | Followup to Aesthetics: #02051421
|
|
damn that's weird - like real surround sound, very clever :)
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-02-17 04:06 [#02051427]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Aesthetics: #02051421 | Show recordbag
|
|
Binaural sound
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-17 04:25 [#02051437]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
Wow! They must vary the time the sound reaches each headphone slightly, as is done with our own ears (instead of just vary volume in each side only).
One time I got some graph paper and drew a circle with a compass on it. I let horizontal represent panning (left of circle = left headphone, right of circle = right headphone, the rest is gradual increments in between). and verticle represent volume (top was loudest and bottom you could barely hear)
Then I divided the perimeter of the circle into 64 equal points and plugged them into cheesy tracker software.
so the sound 'circled' around your head, but not nearly as good as that link.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-02-17 04:38 [#02051441]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #02051437 | Show recordbag
|
|
two small mics placed on a bust
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-17 04:44 [#02051442]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02051441
|
|
LAZY_TITLE
That's really cool. I've never read about this before and it never occured to me how much our own human head shape plays a role in hearing 3d sound.
I'd like to take that recording above and play it as a round on top of itself, so stuff would be going all over.
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2007-02-17 04:54 [#02051446]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker
|
|
heh. just the other day i was (sarcastically) joking about making headphones in 5.1. this impressed me : )
|
|
Aesthetics
from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-02-17 07:16 [#02051491]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker
|
|
I wish I had a plug-in which simulates this stunning realistic effect.
|
|
Brisk
from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-02-17 08:00 [#02051513]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker
|
|
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
stefano_azevedo
from Pindorama (Brazil) on 2007-02-17 08:09 [#02051522]
Points: 4396 Status: Regular
|
|
awesome! but actually if we only have two ears, we wouldn't need more than two sound sources to simulate the 3D reality as we sense it.
actually there is something similar (but not in this scale) at RDJ album, on inkey$ and girlboy redruth, where music sound to come way behind the speakers.
|
|
Rostasky
from United States on 2007-02-17 09:19 [#02051569]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker
|
|
Holy shit.
I wish they explained it.
|
|
jackeroffer
from Aruba on 2007-02-17 10:09 [#02051577]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker
|
|
this is called holophonic recording. this recording of the match box dates back to the Psychic TV album Dreams LEss Sweet. The guy who made this made a few others exclusively for that psychic TV album. Its pretty cool but the holophonic mics cost over $5000, a binaural mic, which i think sounds comparable can be purchased for only $100-$300.
and pigster,they do have some really good 5.1 headphones
look up the Pioneer SE-DHP2000s , they sound better than most movie theatre surround systems, i am not joking.
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2007-02-17 14:37 [#02051662]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
this is holographic sound, not binaural recording
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2007-02-17 14:42 [#02051663]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to jackeroffer: #02051577
|
|
err, holophonic yeah.
also binaural really only works with headphone playback since you've already captured the HRTF with your head , so playing it over speakers will not sound good.
|
|
oyvinto
on 2007-02-17 14:43 [#02051664]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
sounds good! it went left and rigth, up and down, but i could not differ between sound coming from front or the back. anyway it was very realistic.
|
|
oyvinto
on 2007-02-17 14:48 [#02051665]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
http://www.holophonic.ch/archivio/testaudio/voce.mp3
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-17 14:49 [#02051666]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to oyvinto: #02051664
|
|
Perhaps you have a misshaped head.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-17 14:51 [#02051667]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to oyvinto: #02051665
|
|
u make that and have one of these mics?
|
|
chaosmachine
from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-02-17 14:58 [#02051669]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah, it seems to have problems putting sounds in front of you.. most of it felt like it was behind me. still, very cool.
|
|
whoami
from Dallas/Ft. Worth (United States) on 2007-02-17 15:27 [#02051678]
Points: 269 Status: Regular
|
|
when i put the volume all the way up on the vocal track it kinda gives me chills as the voice gets like RIGHT next to you. Reminds me of like a detective questioning you walking back and fourth then stopping and talking in your ear WHERE WERE YOU IN THE NIGHT OF OCTOBER 12TH!
|
|
Rostasky
from United States on 2007-02-17 16:38 [#02051680]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #02051669
|
|
I think this is because there is an equal sound to things behind and ahead at least in this recording, and bevause the mind doesn't see the generation of the sound, it assumes that it is behind you.
If you close your eyes, you can imagine it in front of you better.
|
|
ijonspeches
from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2007-02-17 19:14 [#02051726]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i almost got sick
very good ! front <> back, up >< down
now someone can make music using this?
are nowadays musicians using this to divide their instruments into different places in the room, making it sound better?
some years ago i imagined richard would go for that, then he did front to normal and left to right a lot in that spooky tracks gwely mernans and gwarek2
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-17 19:42 [#02051730]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to ijonspeches: #02051726
|
|
If I remember right a track or two on speedy J's public energy number 1 had interesting panning, but not as good as this. Why haven't any idm stars with loads of money used this technique? Autechre should have by now- they should make an entire album like lp5 all entirely based on this technique with all sorts of fucked up panning shit happening; they did that interesting forever increasing note sequence thing.
|
|
Aesthetics
from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-02-18 03:39 [#02051775]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker
|
|
This, plus the lady wispering seem to be the best to find on the net.
I'm waiting for the first holophonic record by an IDM artist!
|
|
Ezkerraldean
from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-18 03:45 [#02051777]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict
|
|
fucking clever stuff. impressed.
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2007-02-18 05:36 [#02051797]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker | Followup to jackeroffer: #02051577
|
|
holy shit. you speak the truth : D
|
|
LuminousAphid
from home (United States) on 2007-02-18 11:07 [#02051857]
Points: 540 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah if you close your eyes you can tell when it's in front and back, but it sounds like it's up really high in front and low in back. or maybe that's what it was supposed to be, dunno.
|
|
Messageboard index
|