|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2007-02-08 15:12 [#02047412]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker
|
|
13 years. you get it ? 13 FUCKIN YEARS !
it's still pure evil, dark, floating my god this is the fuckin best ambient album ever and no one can ever touch it.
|
|
hanal
from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-08 15:16 [#02047415]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
mc hammer
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2007-02-08 15:18 [#02047416]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker
|
|
i would sell my soul for one of his trousers
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
redrum
from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-02-08 15:20 [#02047419]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict
|
|
saw2 is infinitely better.
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2007-02-08 15:21 [#02047421]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02047419
|
|
talking about it all the time
saw one is 93
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2007-02-08 15:22 [#02047422]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02047419
|
|
and saw one isn't pure evil like mc hammer is
|
|
bob
from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-08 15:24 [#02047427]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02047419
|
|
Correction: you think it is infinitely better.
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2007-02-08 15:24 [#02047428]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to bob: #02047427
|
|
it is
|
|
vlari
from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2007-02-08 15:29 [#02047432]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular
|
|
i can never quite get to know it properly, even after being heavily played over these 13 years, but that's why it is so great
|
|
bob
from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-08 15:29 [#02047434]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #02047428
|
|
You also think this. This is your opinion too.
But if you are trying to say that SAW 2 is better is a FACT, how can it be fact? It is merely opinion.
SAW 85-92 often makes it into Top 100 / 200 / whatever albums of all time (in magazines like Mojo, Q and the like), whereas SAW 2 doesn't. But that's is other peoples opinion as well.
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2007-02-08 15:33 [#02047438]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker
|
|
because it's an unpopular and difficult album. our kids will ashamed of themselves listening to neo-glitch-pop when you give them saw to listen to.
|
|
DirtyPriest
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-02-08 15:58 [#02047481]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker
|
|
Listening now. It is brilliant.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-02-08 16:45 [#02047522]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker
|
|
SAWII is the crowning achievement of Richard D James.
|
|
Rostasky
from United States on 2007-02-08 17:54 [#02047574]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to bob: #02047434
|
|
SAW2 is two cds. That means saw1 has to be over twice as good quality-wise to make up for the quantity of SAW2. I don't think anyone will agree to this.
|
|
darkpromenade
from Australia on 2007-02-08 18:32 [#02047584]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular
|
|
SAW 85-92 is twice as good, quality-wise, than any other release by any other artist.
|
|
bob
from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-08 18:41 [#02047588]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rostasky: #02047574
|
|
You're taking the piss now. It doesn't suit you....
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2007-02-08 18:46 [#02047593]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
SAW2 disc 1 track 3
|
|
OK
on 2007-02-08 20:04 [#02047623]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #02047593
|
|
good point
|
|
EVOL
from a long time ago on 2007-02-08 22:44 [#02047661]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #02047412
|
|
evil, dark
i think you d/l'd a bogus copy...
well, the first half is light and feel goody, not very ambienty. while the second half is kind of stale and broody, classic generic defintion of what ambient altogether encompasses.
sawii tho, IS ambient and the shorter tracks need to be longer than some of the longer tracks.
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2007-02-08 22:47 [#02047662]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
Xtal is the best track aphex ever did, but Saw 2 is better than Saw 1 wholisticly
|
|
hpjochen
from München (Germany) on 2007-02-09 00:50 [#02047681]
Points: 7 Status: Lurker
|
|
SAW II is better by far, best Album ever... everyone who thinks SAW is better is a KACKNOOB
|
|
goDel
from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-02-09 01:23 [#02047690]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker
|
|
KACKNOOB? wtf is a kacknoob??
|
|
gravity_again
on 2007-02-09 01:31 [#02047694]
Points: 196 Status: Regular
|
|
SAW 2 is an amazing album and i've been listening to it a lot lately. Curtains is probably my favourite track from it.
|
|
darkpromenade
from Australia on 2007-02-09 03:46 [#02047723]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to hpjochen: #02047681
|
|
for what it's worth, you're wrong
|
|
CS2x
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-09 04:24 [#02047738]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker
|
|
I love SAWI and II, but I find some of the tracks on the second one a bit grating (like that track with the weird flute melody going round and round, or some of the more percussive tracks.) Maybe those work if you're in some altered state of mind, but I don't find them very atmospheric or enjoyable.
|
|
Messageboard index
|