|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:10 [#02032424]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
i just had an altercation with a genuine paedophile over MSN. this 41 year old guy kept messaging my sister on myspace asking for her email address. i told her to give him mine and id have a bit of fun with the prick.
he comes online and instantly starts with the 'your pics are so beautiful do you have any more?' i tell him im only 15 and ive never done anything like this before. i get 'it doesnt matter how old you are. ill put a sexy one of me in my profile then you put one up. do you have webcam?' i say you DO realise im only 15. he says 'yes' then posts a picture of his cock. i ask him about the kid in his myspace page and he says its his but he's divorced. then 'take your clothes off for me i want to see you naked' i say are you sure this is legal? 'its ok we're both bored'. i decide to send him a picture of a ladyboy with his face on it. i say again im only 15 are you sure you want to see this? 'yeh honey dont be shy' i tell him i am shy so im gonna cover my face. then i send:
Sam is Grate says: guess what i covered my face with? phil says: dunno lol Transfer of "forphil.jpg" is complete.
Sam is Grate says: the mug of a fucking paedophile Sam is Grate says: son of a bitch Sam is Grate says: cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt cunting son of a fucking bitch
Sam is Grate says: I hope to fucking god you dont have custody of that poor kid!
then he goes. so my question is is what next? ive saved the conversation. i have his email and myspace. should i do anything?
also i know i wasnt very poetic in the conversation i was just so bloody angry.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-01-14 19:13 [#02032426]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02032424
|
|
He could probably be prosecuted, yes. Btw, paedophilia applies to pre-pubescent people, not teenagers.
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:14 [#02032430]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
i thought it was under age of consent. stauatory rape up to the age of 23. paedophilia afterwards?
not my area of expertise though.
|
|
EVOL
from a long time ago on 2007-01-14 19:14 [#02032431]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker
|
|
kill him?
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:15 [#02032432]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #02032430 | Show recordbag
|
|
im refering to the age of the offender not the victim :)
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-01-14 19:15 [#02032433]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02032430
|
|
No, paedophilia is definitely having sexual desire for pre-pubescent children. There is another term for sexual attraction to teenagers.
|
|
redrum
from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-01-14 19:21 [#02032437]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to EVOL: #02032431
|
|
why do people berate me for my "rabid anti-Americanism" when they never fail to invariably come out with shit like this?
Why?
Yeah I suppose it's just a few bad eggs.. nothing to do with a rot at the core of your society.
Anyways, yes, carry on, paedophiles, yes, you really should've done a netstat while that file transfer was going on, you could've picked up his IP and with that and the time of the conversation the police would be able to contact the ISP and issue an order to provide them with information on the chap.
Since it doesn't look like you did that, send them on the logs and his myspace..
I don't know, could stuff like that really stand up in court?
I suppose it did with that republican senator fella, but, hmm..
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:24 [#02032439]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02032437 | Show recordbag
|
|
yeh i dont know about any of that netstat stuff etc. i dont get where america comes into this though?
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:26 [#02032441]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
Clint Eastwood was gonna or did marry a 15 year old in pale rider. She was fine as hell too.
|
|
redrum
from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-01-14 19:26 [#02032442]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Indeksical: #02032439
|
|
i'm drunk and pissed off and that part was replying to evol's post. don't you mind it.
g'luck.
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:27 [#02032443]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02032442 | Show recordbag
|
|
cheers man
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2007-01-14 19:29 [#02032444]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular
|
|
What, do you want to send a guy to prison because he wanted to have sex with a 15-year-old girl?
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2007-01-14 19:32 [#02032445]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular
|
|
Haha, shit, look what I found.
Teen girl charged with posting nude photos on Internet
This is a ridiculous world.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:38 [#02032447]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
If you are under 18 you can't ever get naked or you'll be in possession of your own self as child pornography. I hate laws.
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:40 [#02032451]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02032444 | Show recordbag
|
|
youre right. 41 year old men should be allowed to pressurise young girls into giving them nude photos over the internet. what'd be even better would be if he went out in the street and did it in real life!
im not saying i want to send this guy to prison mostly because theres no way i can with a text file that i couldve wrote myself. im saying i know this guy could be dangerous to young girls and im wondering if i should notify anyone.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:41 [#02032452]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
strange questions:
when + what = wwhheant?
who + how = whhoow?
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2007-01-14 19:45 [#02032453]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #02032451
|
|
1) He's not a pedophile and there's no evidence that he's raping everyone around him
2) She's fucking 15, which should be more than old enough for her to be in charge of her own sexuality. There will always be creepy 41-year-old men, whether she's 15 or 18 or whatever the fuck the legal age is.
|
|
Rostasky
from United States on 2007-01-14 19:50 [#02032456]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02032445
|
|
I like how that article explicitly says that "Authorities did not say how police learned about the girl."
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-14 19:59 [#02032463]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02032453 | Show recordbag
|
|
youre completely right. i never said hes raping everyone around him i said 'i know this guy could be dangerous' although in hindsight 'know' was a poor choice of words. 'from speaking to this man i believe this guy could be dangerous to young girls' is what i shouldve said.
and youre right. 15 is old enough to be in charge of your own sexuality. im just worried that the previous or next girl was/will be a lot younger.
the fact the guys probably wanking over my sisters myspace (as he said he was going to) has just made me angry.
|
|
EVOL
from a long time ago on 2007-01-14 20:13 [#02032465]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02032442
|
|
would i be wrong then to assume you are drunk whenever you post? i would've said what you said but i was unable to come up with a way to put it so eloquently as such in your reply, ass. that and the fact i didn't think my comment would have been taken so seriously. but hey, you're drunk right? so that leaves you the liberty of acting like a pompous prick and not be at fault if anyone should disagree with your pov, am i not correct? besides your stance on the issue of "anti-americanism" is a poor defense for such childish behavior. the same argument could be heard coming from racists who could easily apply it to justify their maniacal claims. lush.
|
|
redrum
from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-01-14 20:40 [#02032475]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to EVOL: #02032465
|
|
you said "kill him?". then i said something eloquent, and now you're calling me childish and making comparisons to racists that defy explanation.
|
|
EVOL
from a long time ago on 2007-01-14 21:42 [#02032480]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02032475
|
|
well, you did discredit your opening statement with the following, "Yeah I suppose it's just a few bad eggs.. nothing to do with a rot at the core of your society." which also begs me to ask, "what in the hell are you exactly refering to in regards to my reply?" what shit is who coming out with? and funny how someone so removed from "our" society, can be such a great annalytical surveyor about the ways of a people on an entirely different continent. but your advice in the rest of your post was spot on, having to do with pedophiles and all. i just didn't understand the need to drag me through it at any point.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-01-15 04:58 [#02032569]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to EVOL: #02032480
|
|
Shut up.
|
|
gravity_again
on 2007-01-15 06:29 [#02032641]
Points: 196 Status: Regular
|
|
You can send a message to the people who run MySpace (I dont use MySpace so I dont know exactly who) explaining the situation, they will at least ban his IP and delete his profile right?
|
|
Dannn_
from United Kingdom on 2007-01-15 06:48 [#02032644]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker
|
|
I'd report it, they won't go and arrest him straight away or anything, but theyll have a record, which can't hurt
|
|
EVOL
from a long time ago on 2007-01-15 07:55 [#02032665]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02032569
|
|
oh no help i'm being attacked by the clique
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-01-15 08:11 [#02032672]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
do u belief in gods?
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-01-15 08:28 [#02032687]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to EVOL: #02032665
|
|
No, we're being attacked by your Giant Waffle.
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2007-01-15 09:40 [#02032736]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular
|
|
Ask him his best paedophile sites please. It's for a friend.
|
|
Messageboard index
|