|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-06 14:15 [#02027394]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
Made you look.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-06 14:15 [#02027395]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #02027394
|
|
God damn it.
|
|
goDel
from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-01-06 16:43 [#02027436]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker
|
|
It surprises me how no-one has made a post already. Disappointed, actually. I mean, I'm sure I'm not the only one that looked. Is it? IS IT??
Nevermind. Sorry to interrupt you in your individual dialogue w M w. Don't look at this post! DON'T
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-01-06 17:53 [#02027475]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker
|
|
I wish this wasn't for w M w only :(
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2007-01-06 17:54 [#02027477]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
i'm a w M w
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2007-01-06 18:09 [#02027485]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker
|
|
well, looks like other non-wmw users have already made their way in here and are quite comfortable. all looks like a big scam to me.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-06 18:13 [#02027487]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
dum dee dum... *!* ...HEY!... ...WHAT ARE ALL OF YOU DOING IN MY THREAD??
|
|
ToXikFB
on 2007-01-06 18:21 [#02027490]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker
|
|
thanks w M w, i'm going to bed now
:-)
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-01-06 21:48 [#02027575]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #02027394 | Show recordbag
|
|
that avatar teeters perilously between comically grotesque and criminally ugly.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-01-06 21:49 [#02027576]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02027575 | Show recordbag
|
|
I love it.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-06 22:12 [#02027580]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02027575
|
|
It's actually a real dog.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-06 22:13 [#02027581]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
Will the real w M w please stand up, please stand up, please stand up.
|
|
goDel
from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-01-07 01:41 [#02027602]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to pigster: #02027485
|
|
What do you mean, non-wmw users? We're all being used by the wmw-user!
|
|
taking_the_piz
on 2007-01-07 02:19 [#02027617]
Points: 795 Status: Lurker
|
|
I'm the real w M w.
|
|
Sandy
from Morocco (Morocco) on 2007-01-07 03:03 [#02027631]
Points: 1493 Status: Regular
|
|
I shouldn't be here...
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-07 03:31 [#02027644]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
English has too many unnecessary syllables and letters.
There's no word yet called 'eng' for example, which has fewer letters and syllables than 'english', so why not use it? ... unnecessary... well I don't like the 'un' negation because un is 2 letters, when only one letter is needed for a negation. So a '-' symbol will be used instead. 'necessary' becomes 'nec', only 'nes' is better because why have c sometimes pronounced one way and sometimes another- it's a pointless rule. 'syl' can't be used for 'syllables' because it might be confused with 'sylabus', so 'syll' should work. I like pluralization with one 's' letter, let's keep that. maybe all 'and's should just be '+', still pronounced 'and' though cuz that is just one syllable.
Eng has too many -nes sylls + letts.
That alone takes up only 2/3 as many neurons. But with many more revisions you could just say something like "muh".
I guess if vowels can be removed and result in a unique string of letters they should be. For example 'his' has to keep the 'i' because 'hs' could look like 'has'.
Eng has too mny -ns slls + ltts
maybe england should be eng and english should be engsh. It's 2:30 am.
|
|
stefano_azevedo
from Pindorama (Brazil) on 2007-01-07 03:35 [#02027646]
Points: 4396 Status: Regular
|
|
where wmw is?
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-07 03:38 [#02027648]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
I'm actually on another planet, but since I'm the only one who lives here, it was easier to just adopt earth's am/pm time system, though my days are 453 hours long (and some minutes and seconds, but I figure that's close enough.. I'll just resyncronize (spelling) it 8,000 years from now when it gets too out of phase.
|
|
Ezkerraldean
from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-07 05:12 [#02027689]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict
|
|
your own personal thread
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-01-08 10:17 [#02028376]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #02027644 | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm dwn
|
|
Messageboard index
|