The Singularity.. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
recycle
belb
big
...and 252 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
The Singularity..
 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2006-11-27 10:00 [#02008658]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



Any of you into this sort of thing? Been mulling through
"the singularity is near"...


 

offline uviol from United States on 2006-11-27 10:02 [#02008660]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



as in.. Vernor Vinge?


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2006-11-27 10:09 [#02008664]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



singularity

singularity

singularity

time, space, infinity


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2006-11-27 10:13 [#02008666]
Points: 408 Status: Regular | Followup to uviol: #02008660



Ray Kurzweil


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-27 10:21 [#02008669]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



The singularity already happened; they deal with us humans
by constantly rewinding our time whenever we catch up to the
point when it happens. But all teh robots are in teh future
having a robot party w/ teh techno music.


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2006-11-27 10:33 [#02008670]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



This is why I keep my tin foil hat always at arms reach.
Damn robots and their techno musics.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-11-27 10:37 [#02008671]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



i have no idea what this means


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-27 10:39 [#02008673]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to i_x_ten: #02008671



when we make ai, ai will make its own superior ai. it'll be
so smart that it'll dwarf us by like A BILLION! So then
peculiar things will happen... very peculiar things.
Such as the ability to constantly rewind the time of all
humans while selfishly keeping the future for themselves for
their robot party.


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2006-11-27 10:46 [#02008675]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



Ok... quick summary...

Ray Kurzweil's theory of the singularity, shows with
"statistical" proof (by measuring technological advances of
the human race), that at some point in time, artificial
intelligence will meet human intelligence. That single
point of time (when AI can match human intelligence), is
called the singularity... His vision of the future, by use
of AI, nanotechnology, and unmatched computational skills of
intelligence we develop with computer technology.. is such
that without the restraints of our primitive brain,
computers will be able to carry on our advancement faster
than we can, each exponential growth faster than the last.


The next stage in human evolution...

It's refreshing to see "philosophy" in modern form :)


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-27 10:54 [#02008676]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to edgey: #02008675



I think the point of the singularity is the point beyond
when they match us, like the point where'd we be like wtf
because we're not mitochondria compared to them. But there's
plenty of us and we're a nice size and can be converted into
their robot fuel. Robot language won't use bits- it will use
snats.
On a seperate level we are the singularity to trees. Yes.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-11-27 10:54 [#02008677]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to edgey: #02008675



oh right, i had no idea it was called that. do you honestly
think it will happen though?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-27 10:55 [#02008678]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



i mean not not


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-27 10:55 [#02008680]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



based on moors law and that exponential growth itself is
exponentially growing


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2006-11-27 11:04 [#02008684]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



if moore's law holds true in terms of technological
advances, there's well more than enough evidence to suggest
it could happen.

Kurzweil hits on one very cool topic in terms of
nanotechnology being able to virtually create anything "out
of thin air".. so sci-fi concepts such as star trek's
holo-deck (although different technology) could become a
reality, although not neccesarily "holograms" but actual
tangible objects made entirely of nano-bots.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-11-27 11:07 [#02008685]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to edgey: #02008675 | Show recordbag



he's just assuming intelligence can be made
artificially


 

offline uviol from United States on 2006-11-27 11:12 [#02008687]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to edgey: #02008666



Ah, okay. This guy is who I was thinking of.
Sounds like they had similar ideas.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-27 11:13 [#02008688]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



What if its also true that our universe is just a simulation
running on some aliens computer. Then the ai we make becomes
so smart that it breaks out of the computer simulation. Yes.


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2006-11-27 11:19 [#02008694]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



Yeh, I think Kurzweil got most of his ideas from Vinge. But
Kurzweil follows Moore's law to "prove" his theory.


 

offline edgey from New York (United States) on 2006-11-27 11:21 [#02008696]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



I think Vinge is the reason we have so many bad sci-fi
movies about the internet waking up and eating us or
something.

beware teh internets1


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2006-11-27 11:26 [#02008698]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



super canjy macinberry dilly camfy wuuuuuphuuuuus!


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-04-27 10:18 [#02076461]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



Ok, here is Dawkins's's speculation of 'the singularity',
just not referred to with that name by him, making it the
2nd from an information necromancer (other being ray
kurzweil). This is from the blind watchmaker:

"In the selfish gene i speculated that we may now be on the
threshold of a new kind of genetic takeover. dna replicators
build 'survival machines' for themselves - the bodies of
living organisms including ourselves. as part of their
equipment, bodies evolved onboard computers - brains. brains
evolved the capacity to communicate with other brains by
means of language and cultural traditions. but the new
milieu of cultural tradition opens up new possibilities for
self-replicating entities. The new replicators are not dna
and they are not clay crystals. they are patterns of
information that can thrive only in brains or the
artificially manufactured products of brains - books,
computers and so on. But given that brains books and
computers exist, these new replicators, which i called memes
to distinguish them from genes, can propagate themselves
from brain to brain, from brain to book, from book to brain,
from brain to computer, and from computer to computer. as
they propagate they can change - mutate. and perhaps
'mutant' memes can exert the kinds of influence that i am
here calling 'replicator power'. remember that this means
any kind of influence affecting their own liklihood of being
propagated. evolution under the influence of the new
replicatore - memic evolution- is in its infancy. it is
manifested in the phenomena that we call cultural evolution.
Cultural evolution is many orders of magnitude faster than
dna based evolution which sets one even more to thinking of
the ideas of 'takeover'. and if a new kind of replicator
takeover is beginning, it is conceivable that it will take
off so far as to leave its parent dna (and its grandparent
clay if cairns-smith is right) far behind. if so we may be
sure that computers will be in the van."


 

offline Chin Bwoy Phat from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-04-27 10:20 [#02076463]
Points: 574 Status: Lurker



nice Dopplereffekt lyrics.


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-04-27 14:08 [#02076581]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #02076461



haha! it'll be fun to see how hubbert peak theory will adversely
affect the propagation of these memes.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-04-27 17:27 [#02076702]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to EVOL: #02076581



The memes and robots will learn that human screams from
being tortured can be stored in cans and used as a superior
fuel source. And if the torture accidently renders them dead
or unconscious (unlikely due to their robot precision but it
happens), the bodies can be turned into petroleum in a day
with their superior technology. I can't wait for my body to
be burned as petroleum for my robot masters! Take me now!


 

offline Sclah from Freudian Slipmat on 2007-04-27 17:32 [#02076707]
Points: 3121 Status: Lurker



I don't really care, as it won't happen in my lifetime


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-04-27 17:39 [#02076710]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sclah: #02076707



As long as you're not 80 or something it might, given that
graphs of exponential change over time themselves have
exponential change. (though this seems like a mind trick and
is only one instance of exponential change where the
exponent is simply larger..)


 


Messageboard index