do you live in a police state? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
belb
...and 355 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
do you live in a police state?
 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-10-27 00:52 [#01993253]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



are you sure?


 

offline Matvey from Kiev (Ukraine) on 2006-10-27 01:17 [#01993254]
Points: 6851 Status: Regular



ehhh.. seeing only comments. too much to read - have to work
and stuff. answering the question, i think ukraine is not a
police state yet, though some people, i.e. Kiev mayor, are a
bit sick, mean and so on and so on.
Folks say Russia is already a police state. they may be
exaggerating or not or talking only about situation in
Moscow.

a smiley -> :)


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2006-10-27 01:27 [#01993256]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



these kinds of videos are very emotionally charging for me,

but there is nothing i can do about it. living in red-state
texas, my votes don't count for shit -- and if i were to go
jump a police officer right now and call him a fascist,
charges would be brought up on me, my black ass thrown in
jail without a possibility for parole

america just does not care, it's complacent. it elects a
DOUCHEBAG like george bush and then allows things like the
patriot act to pass, etc. 250 million people and not enough
of them care enough to do anything about it.

myself notwithstanding-- i mean, i would get up and join an
uprising, but, i know i would be labeled a 'terrorist',
thrown in jail and executed. its that easy! MOST PEOPLE MY
AGE who think like i do KNOW THIS.



 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-10-27 01:56 [#01993257]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



i suppose we do. apparently we have the highest number of
security cameras per head in the world.

and there is certainly a police bias towards young people.
"youths" and "hoodies" are the prime suspects in everything
these days. i have seen a police vauxhall calibra go past me
and a group of mates a few times, one time the cop driving
it kept shouting "wohoo!" at us as he lapped round town,
obviously trying to incite us into egging him or something.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2006-10-27 02:43 [#01993265]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular



"If this were nazi germany, in the 1930s, would you want
Adolf Hitler to have these pictures?"

Haha, very subtle.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-10-27 07:54 [#01993334]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



this comes as no surprise to me


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-10-27 07:56 [#01993335]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to redrum: #01993334



hows the surveillance / political lynchings / corrupt cops
over in ireland?
probably a lot less of it, in the Republic at least


 

offline impakt from where we do not speak of! on 2006-10-27 07:59 [#01993338]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Not yet, but we're heading there.


 

online big from lsg on 2006-10-27 08:08 [#01993347]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



there was a good documentary about this on dutch tv. with
knowledgeble critics and even some scientists. and no
whining woman


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-27 08:21 [#01993351]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



that part where she says she doesn't want the government to
have this kind of footage of her is kind of odd; why protest
if you don't want anyone to know you were at the protest?
Aren't protests about showing you are opposed to
something?


 

online big from lsg on 2006-10-27 08:38 [#01993354]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01993351 | Show recordbag



you know what she means


 

offline oyvinto on 2006-10-27 08:38 [#01993355]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



if we get it the way people wants, it will become a police
state. most people are fucking idiots and a lot of them
votes for the right wing neo-nazis called frp. you know what
i mean torbey.


 

offline oyvinto on 2006-10-27 08:38 [#01993356]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01993354 | Show recordbag



no, he knows what i mean
get it?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-27 08:41 [#01993358]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01993354 | Show recordbag



yeah, but I find her reasoning silly. If I was at a protest,
the first thing I'd want is for the government to know
I was there. I couldn't really go to a protest to
show anything but my own opposition, now, could I, so what
would matter is that other people knew I was there.

However, I don't go to protests because I find it to be a
futile way of criticising mostly because you're limited to
slogan-like "arguments."


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-27 08:48 [#01993361]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to oyvinto: #01993355 | Show recordbag



haha, yeah, but I don't think frp would be able to implement
more police control with their politics.. they're pretending
to be all "you know what's better for yourself no matter
what you're deciding on." I can only imagine them cutting
the funding to education because "you don't need it." I was
at that Carl I. debate in samfunnet here in Bergen, and he
was all like "nah, we don't care about students" (maybe
because education brings insight and insight makes you
realise they're candy-coated anuses that haven't been
washed; it tastes sweet when you start licking it, but when
the coating wears off, you taste the shit).


 

offline OK on 2006-10-27 11:47 [#01993451]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



not yet


 

offline Mr Brazil from Oh Joan, I love you so... on 2006-10-29 00:30 [#01994282]
Points: 1970 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #01993253



Nope.


 

offline OK on 2006-10-30 16:32 [#01995455]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



OK now I am.


 

offline Mr Brazil from Oh Joan, I love you so... on 2006-10-30 16:33 [#01995456]
Points: 1970 Status: Lurker



Okay, me too.



 

offline Mr Brazil from Oh Joan, I love you so... on 2006-10-30 16:34 [#01995457]
Points: 1970 Status: Lurker



No, no, wait...not anymore...



 

offline OK on 2006-10-30 16:34 [#01995458]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



LINKLINK


 

offline rad smiles on 2006-10-30 17:54 [#01995481]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



i live in a fireman's state.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-30 17:58 [#01995483]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



Politics


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-10-31 04:10 [#01995610]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01993358 | Show recordbag



Agreed.

Also, the police's line would be that it's to capture
evidence of troublemakers (people who turn protests violent-
not organisers) and also to aid recognising them at
future riots. Whilst this may not be the only reason for
filming, surely it's a justifiable one? I imagine protestors
don't want the people who kick off against the police
present at "peaceful demonstrations"?

Perhaps a culture akin to that of policing football matches
would be appropriate? Normal fans (in this case, normal
protestors) would be allowed to protest as normal. Hooligans
(in this case, protestors who have thrown rocks/smashed up
shops/assaulted police etc.) would be recognised and banned
from future protests and could be arrested simply for
attending them in future? Effectively, by not protesting
peacefully, you lose your right to protest at all.

Naturally, you'd need to prove someone started violence (and
video evidence would be good proof of this); you couldn't
just ban people at the drop of a hat.

As an aside:

I don't agree with a lot of powers that the police have been
granted in recent years. I wouldn't, however, describe it as
a police state. I can slate the police (and I have done this
in court) without fear of any real reprisal, I've also
complained about the way officers have behaved to other
police. I've not had my door kicked down at dawn and been
dragged off to a concentration camp, never to be seen again.
So, I'd say whilst our police have disproportiante powers
and far too many are cynical with regard to the legal
system, it's not a police state here. Yet.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 04:14 [#01995611]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01995610



hmpffffff


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-10-31 04:29 [#01995615]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to unabomber: #01995611 | Show recordbag



What are you disagreeing with?

Are you saying people have a right to violent protest that
the state should tolerate?


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 04:37 [#01995617]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



Well, the cops have all those guns, grenades, tear gas,
shields, tanks, helicopters... to defend the state.

And I can't tolerate the state.

That's why most revolutions are violent.

Should revolution not be tolerated?


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 04:43 [#01995619]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



They seem really friendly and willing to engange in
intellectual debate!

BTW: They shoot first. We just replied. With faces covered.
Because we're HOOLIGANS!


Attached picture

 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-10-31 04:49 [#01995621]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to unabomber: #01995619 | Show recordbag



If you engage in violent protest, it seems a bit churlish to
complain when the police use force themselves. Yes, the
police sometimes shoot first. There are also situations
where protestors throw the first stone and to suggest
otherwise is to be in denial.

IMO If you believe in violent protest, fine, but I think by
doing so, you lose your right to complain when the police
billy-club you unconcious.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 04:52 [#01995622]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



Concerning nonviolence: It is criminal to teach a man not to
defend himself, when he is the constant victim of brutal
attacks.

Malcolm X

Long ago I made a song with that quote. They stole my idea
for the song in the ending of "V for vendetta".


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-10-31 04:57 [#01995623]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to unabomber: #01995622 | Show recordbag



Oh don't get me wrong. I certainly believe violence has its
place, if only as a last resort. I'm not one of these
pansies that would tolerate someone commiting acts of
violence towards me and retaliate with only words.

I just think it's a 2 way thing: You hate the state, you
admit to using violence towards it. Hence you can't
reasonably object when it then hates you and uses violence
towards you.

If your point is that the state "started it", when exactly
did the state commit violence towards you and what were the
circumstances? I'm not saying it didn't, I'm just
interested.

BTW I mean violence as in the police gave you a beating for
no reason- not some pseudo-intellectual argument such as
"restricting my freedom is in itself violent." :)


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 04:57 [#01995625]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



And well, I don't complain too much. I know what I do and
what I face.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 05:05 [#01995628]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01995623



One exaple:
Those fuckers in the pic followed our "demonstration" for
three hours, at one point (and no violence appeared before
that point) they gone in formation, blocked us, and started
shooting amazing amounts of tear gas and conclussion
grenades at us. One blew ma mate face. I had to take out
from there several old hippie ladys that looked terrified
and were petrified. Then, well, I started the blowback. With
stones. Funny thing, the water turret was used against those
who get real close to the cops line, but after breathing
tones of tear gas, and with your skin all fucked up, it was
quite nice to be showered. They noticed and started shooting
the grenades at point blank. I have one as a souvenir.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 05:11 [#01995630]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



Oh, and I just remember that during those actions, in some
other place around, a dude hanged himself from a bridge with
a huge flag or soething (that's not very violent) and a cop
went there and cuted the "cable" making him fall from enough
meters to send him to the hospital with several damage.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 05:27 [#01995634]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



Some info here...

Oh, and I also have been beaten in student protests just
because the people in the back pushed us over the cops.

And in protests against recent wars, it was very close to
explode, but we managed to make a deal with the hippies and
stayed calm (calm = eggs and paint balloons).


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 05:41 [#01995641]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



this thread needs Robocop!


Attached picture

 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-10-31 05:55 [#01995649]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to unabomber: #01995628 | Show recordbag



Out of interest, had they, prior to to throwing the grenades
etc. offered any warning? For example, something along the
lines of, "Disperse now. Anyone remaining here in 2 minutes
will be gassed." If not, I agree that's out of order.

With the student protest, I can sort of see how that
happened. Imagine the police at the back had been pushing
the front police forwards and the ones at the front had been
barging into your line and knocking into people. I imagine
the protestors would have tried to push the police back and
then the police would have retaliated.

Also, please answer me this honestly; Is there any part of
you that enjoys protests? Even if it's an issue you feel
strongly about, do you enjoy the protest at all (even a
little bit), or do you hate them and grudgingly go due to
feelings that it is your civic/moral obligation to go.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 06:09 [#01995655]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



1- No warning offered. That's why some old people and lots
of hippies got caught in between...

2- I don't fancy violence. It's more of an anger that moves
me. I keep all time in mind why and for whom I fight. And
that fuels me enough.

I'm a really kind person. Never get enganged in fights with
random people. Never beat nobody. In fact, I'm one of those
idiots that try to stop fights when arround and end beaten.
And even then I stay calm and peacefull. Fight with a
hig-on-coke-chav is not for me. Better throw myself in the
floor and act like they really hurted me (learnt that in a
Batman comic).
Violence never takes place in my "usual" life. Never.
I'm a shy and introverted dude!

BUT, I know what you mean. There's people that fights
because they think it makes them cool. People that don't
give a fuck what they fight for, but enjoy throwing stones.
People whom you could ask why they do it and would have no
proper answer. Even people who does it to get girls! I tell
you, if you wanna get laid in an anti g8 meeting, easyest
way is show them you are a frontliner.

But what can I do? There's idiots everywhere.

Honestly.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-10-31 06:16 [#01995659]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to unabomber: #01995655 | Show recordbag



Good answer.

I respect the motives you have for doing it. I know not all
protestors are like it, but the ones who are in for the buzz
as you describe do my head in. They're worse than football
hooligans, at least you know with them it's lads having a
bit of a laugh at a weekend. The people who choose to wreck
peaceful protests by kicking off for fun are worse as they
tar all protestors with the same brush and make the general
populace anti-protest.

When I was a student I was invited to go on a protest. I
asked what it was against- was it tuition fees or something
not to do with university life. The answer still winds me
up, even to this day, "I dunno what it's about mate. Just a
trip down to London and maybe mash up some police."
It's as if someone turned that Ali G video where he goes to
an anti-hunting protest into reality.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-31 06:20 [#01995662]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01995659



LOL, those dumbass students! They're always the chosen ones
to appear on the TV and make everyone seem stupid.


 


Messageboard index