[spam] Uranus (actual version) | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 352 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[spam] Uranus (actual version)
 

offline sirmailbox from chicago area (United States) on 2006-09-03 12:34 [#01964452]
Points: 213 Status: Lurker



A little while ago I posted a track for review and everyone
said it sounded unfinished. Turns out, it was unfinished. I
accidentally posted a clip of a really early version of the
song instead of the final one. Well I hope you guys will be
kind enough to give it another try. Tell me what you think

Uranus


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-09-03 12:42 [#01964458]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



sounds unfinished.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-09-03 12:46 [#01964460]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Listened...it sounds horrible...like a cheesy keyboard demo
song...oh god, I'm sorry...I really am...but I don't know
what else to type.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-09-03 12:50 [#01964463]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



It's as good as Nameless.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-09-06 00:07 [#01966152]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01964460



haha!

i don't think it's that bad, but i can't say it's very good
either. too much flanger on that obnoxious synth. beats
are kinda generic. sounds like you haven't been making
tunes very long. if that's the case, i think this is like
one of those tracks that you think sounds good now, but
years from now, if you are still producing music, you will
look back at this and laugh at how bad you used to be.

so what i'm saying is, don't get discouraged when we tell
you this sucks.

also, never call a track 'Uranus' unless it's supposed to be
a joke. FYI


 

offline xf from Australia on 2006-09-06 10:19 [#01966342]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker



i actually like it. it doesn't sound 'finished', but
there's something neat about it, that's for sure.

i think it'd probably sound 50x more awesome done with
proper 80's synths and stuff; it sounds like it's trying to
emulate this but failing.


 

offline xf from Australia on 2006-09-06 10:25 [#01966343]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker



first half of the song sounds far more interesting than the
last half; feels like it goes absolutely nowhere after
this.

i reckon you've got something good here, but it definitely
needs more work. it needs to sound toiter!


 


Messageboard index