|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2006-08-20 15:17 [#01957200]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i really
want to buy a 300d and do the IR conversion
long shutter = TEH NOISY SUCK
|
|
chambre noire
from Iceland on 2006-08-20 15:28 [#01957211]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker
|
|
how does one do the ir conversion
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2006-08-20 15:29 [#01957212]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
|
|
This is what the world looks like to Geordie in Star Trak.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2006-08-20 15:29 [#01957213]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
|
|
*Sorry, Satr Terk
|
|
hanal
from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2006-08-20 15:30 [#01957217]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
very very nice
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2006-08-20 15:32 [#01957219]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker
|
|
Nice photos Mike, you know I appreciate :)
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2006-08-20 15:37 [#01957223]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
discussed here before i think ive had a cheap r32 hoya filter for like a year or two now i just never used it a lot
it blocks / filters all light range except IR (and a touch of red at the far end of the spectrum) = very little light coming in hitting the sensor = need long exposure (15-20seconds) = needs to be on tripod = hassel for taking shots
plus theyget real noisey
i need to do that conversion bad
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2006-08-20 15:41 [#01957227]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Could I do it on my 1D Mark II?
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-08-20 15:47 [#01957232]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
awesome!
what happens if you try making a HDR image with that mod?
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2006-08-20 15:47 [#01957234]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01957232 | Show recordbag
|
|
Nature implodes.
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2006-08-20 15:53 [#01957236]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
Those awesome. No standard invert crap. Very cool
|
|
dave_g
from United Kingdom on 2006-08-20 16:05 [#01957245]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker
|
|
Some of those photographs are really amazing. I really like those, please keep up the excellent work.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-08-20 16:06 [#01957246]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01957234 | Show recordbag
|
|
hahah
I imagine it'd just go "flop"
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2006-08-20 16:07 [#01957248]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
Sometimes I really wish I knew what the fuck it was I was missing out on that keeps you pricks so happy.
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2006-08-20 16:10 [#01957251]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker
|
|
I was about to come in and type shit like "Oh i don't see the point of IR photos blah blah blah" but they're actually fucking stunning!
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2006-08-20 16:12 [#01957252]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01957248 | Show recordbag
|
|
The world chico, the world.
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2006-08-20 16:13 [#01957253]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker
|
|
that one shot across the porch is fantastic, looks so christmassy!
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2006-08-20 16:14 [#01957256]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Obviously taffmonster will now go out and buy one for his Japan thing and do the conversion and then try to sell it for half what he paid so he can afford to go on his Japan thing.
|
|
Taffmonster
from dog_belch (Japan) on 2006-08-20 16:17 [#01957258]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01957256
|
|
and then Japan will implode!
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2006-08-20 16:19 [#01957259]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to Taffmonster: #01957258 | Show recordbag
|
|
As long as you've got the right fucking plug.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2006-08-20 16:23 [#01957263]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
ecnad, as far as im aware, the 1d/1ds have very strong IR filters, and I believe it's extremely difficult to product IR photos with a filter.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2006-08-20 16:24 [#01957264]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
IR filters before the sensor that is
so using an IR filter on your lens would let even less light (IR) in than a pro-sumer canon dslr.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2006-08-20 16:27 [#01957266]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Ah, I see (I have no idea really) :)
I can't be arsed with photographs. I was going to go down to the docks one night to take pictures and ended up at a pub instead.
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2006-08-20 16:27 [#01957268]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
There's some tasteless oil sheikh having his bum wiped that would buy a shit load of this ART at the drop of a headdress.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-08-20 16:29 [#01957270]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
oh dear, I dropped my headdress
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2006-08-20 16:32 [#01957272]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
I am a bit drunk, sorry. Carry on with the pictures that are funny colours.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2006-08-20 16:38 [#01957275]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
[photos] ded serios with IR
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2006-08-20 17:05 [#01957293]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01957270 | Show recordbag
|
|
:)
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2006-08-20 19:16 [#01957340]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
In plain english. How was this done? I also love night vision photos.
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2006-08-20 19:19 [#01957343]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker
|
|
does not look like shite, looks good
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2006-08-21 08:18 [#01957472]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
bogala, just with a lens-filter (IR filter) that blocks out all light except IR (and a touch on the red end of the spectrum).
since very little light is not hitting the sensor, you have to have the shutter open a long time = induced noise, blurry trees (if the wind is bad) etc,, 15-20second shutter times
which means you also have to have it setup on a tripod
|
|
swift_jams
from big sky on 2006-08-21 08:36 [#01957479]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker
|
|
Our member, Paco got me intrested in starting to make "curve" sets for Photoshop when he sent me the "X-Pro" set he and a fellow photographer did. I played around and switched settings and balances to make one for infrared. It's neat how some computer program can effectively emulate a film/processing/or shot style.
|
|
chambre noire
from Iceland on 2006-08-21 08:48 [#01957482]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker | Followup to swift_jams: #01957479
|
|
would you mind sending it to me? mattia.marchi at gmail.com coolio!
|
|
swift_jams
from big sky on 2006-08-21 08:52 [#01957484]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to chambre noire: #01957482
|
|
Can't access my computer right now! I broke it a week ago or so, so now I'm on my parents. I'll send it as soon as I get the chance though.
|
|
Paco
from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2006-08-21 10:39 [#01957507]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
Elusive, hunt down some really cheap digital cameras (with a filter thread) and try that with your R72. You can use step up rings to fit the filter to a smaller thread. I've noticed, the cheaper the camera, the more sensitive it is for IR. My phone gives really short times, while both the EOS 300D and 5D need at least 30s @ f/11.
Really nice photos! Great editing too, I know how boring they look straight out of the camera.
|
|
yann_g
from now on 2006-08-21 17:52 [#01957706]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01957223
|
|
but u have to use an ir sensitive film aren't you?
|
|
yann_g
from now on 2006-08-21 17:55 [#01957707]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to yann_g: #01957706
|
|
or does the filter change the waves' wavelength?
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2006-08-21 18:04 [#01957713]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
long shutter times really make wonderful shots. I took a photo course and the teacher would set really dim lighting in a room and leave the shutter open all night long. Or street lamp scenes at night stuff like that. And the results were incredible. Textures like you wouldn't believe.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2006-08-21 18:21 [#01957724]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
no, it's a digital sensor/camera using an IR filter over the lens (to block all light except IR from hitting the sensor).
|
|
yann_g
from now on 2006-08-21 19:56 [#01957738]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker
|
|
oh ok so it's set up to receive ir! never thought of that. like the silver process more tho :) but your pics render quite well. and there is offset in the focus i guess...
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2006-08-21 20:01 [#01957739]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
no, no focus issues just more induced noise with the longer shutter (15-20second shutter speed) which also results in some blurry shots (tree branches blowing in the wind) due to the long suhtter time.
will probably pickup a p&s cam to do the IR mod tho.
real time IR is what i want. white trees, black sky = lush
|
|
mimi
on 2006-08-21 21:16 [#01957750]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular
|
|
Nice, elusive
looks like you have some dust on your sensor though in a couple of those shots
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2006-08-21 22:30 [#01957755]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
these are pretty fat, as in "good." and even as in "fat."
|
|
manicminer
from Paris (France) on 2006-08-22 16:32 [#01958175]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker
|
|
Those photos are fecking AMAZING!
|
|
Messageboard index
|