[SPAM] feed me back | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 575 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614124
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[SPAM] feed me back
 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 11:00 [#01913077]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



hallo all! we are putting together a college compilation CD
on which each student will have a track to showcase what
we've all been up to this year. i have chosen this one
and as i want to shit on all the people who are making awful
house and bland RnB backing tracks i want it to be as good
as it can possibly be. so firstly let me know what you
think, especially if you think its crap, and then let me
know how i can make it better production wise and
everything.

thanks!


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-06-04 11:01 [#01913079]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



Downloading



 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 11:07 [#01913084]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



goodo


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-06-04 11:11 [#01913089]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



I didnt enjoy it in any way, to put it shortly. Id rather
have awful house. I'm sorry :(


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 11:14 [#01913090]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



thats ok! i understand that it isnt to many peoples tastes.
not much of my stuff is as its all train-of-thought
gibberish.


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-06-04 11:19 [#01913092]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



The thing that really bugs me are the drums. They do
absolutely nothing good for the track. It sounds like
somebody just layered a crappy drum line over some random
shit. Nothing makes me want to listen to the track again.
Maybe if you completely removed the drums it could be an ok
track actually. But those drums destroys the entire track.
So that would be my advice to sort of save the track, remove
the drums completely. Even when you do that, i dont think
your ideas are strong enough in this track, to make it worth
anybodys time.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2006-06-04 11:22 [#01913094]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



i really don't want to be a cunt of any sort but in this
sort of situation honesty can make me appear to be a cunt. i
personally did not like it at all. i appreciate the
technical side of it, but to me, the sounds just don't seem
to 'fit' - you say it isn't to many people's tastes so i'm
glad you're aware of that. if i were you i'd remove the
first 2 minutes and 20 seconds and then the last minute. to
give you a more specific reason as to why i didn't like it,
i think it was the voice sounds. they kind of sound really
trashy. sorry again. i know how it feels to have music
criticised. when you let something creative like this be
judged you are opening yourself up to take some punches.
don't be put down by it though.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2006-06-04 11:23 [#01913096]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



i want to add that i respect you for trying something
different


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-06-04 11:23 [#01913097]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #01913094



The same. Cuntiness and honesty go hand in hand.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 11:26 [#01913101]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i was going to try and defend the random shit as its not
random but i dont want to provide a longwinded crappy
explanation about how all those vocals work together on a
message level if not an aural one. comments about the drums
duely noted! thank you!


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 11:49 [#01913115]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



ok ive decided not to use that track partly because of the
actually really useful comments but also because ive just
realised the track has to be under 4 minutes so i have two
more your discerning ears this little ditty and this track
made up entirely of noises from around my house which needs
materering and a lot of editing. more honesty please!

also i have the horrible feeling im going to end up posting
about 30 tracks before i make a final decision. apologies in
advance.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 11:50 [#01913116]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



what the hell is materering?


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2006-06-04 12:04 [#01913125]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



i favour ddgaksi but it's still well over 4 minutes.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 12:07 [#01913126]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



it is too long but its still at a stage where im happy to go
in and shorten it and mess around with it. i tend to fuck
things off once ive got to a certain point and never touch
them again.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-06-04 12:08 [#01913127]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



those two are good, especially the 8bit one. The noises from
your house one is a nice experiment but without knowing the
back story its a bit boring. Judging from these three tracks
I would say you are probably not doing enought producing -
effects and mastering, and just filling out the track a bit
more with background sounds, more layers, more bass...


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-06-04 12:10 [#01913128]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



materering:


Attached picture

 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-06-04 12:10 [#01913129]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #01913077



I think your 'for four girls' track starts out good, then i
like the beats when they first kick in , but then i think
they kinda overstay their welcome. this track has some good
potential with some editing i think.

your 'youdie' track is cute. but maybe too long. i like
these kinds of tracks to be under 2 minutes personally. but
that's just me.

'DDGaksi' is also very cute. i like the noises you've
collected for it. but it feels like a lot of build up and
no payoff. I kept waiting for like a good bass line to kick
in or some good energetic melody. I'm sure that wasn't your
intention though.

thanks for sharing.



 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 12:19 [#01913131]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Dannn_: thanks for the opinions. youve got me thinking now
that maybe im choosing the wrong kind of tracks. ive got 4
minutes and no chance to explain the music or myself at all.
things like DDgaksi wont fly without explanation. looks like
ill have to think about this a bit more...


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-06-04 13:02 [#01913145]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



the beginning made me laugh. it sounds a bit like someone
Trying To Be Arty. I did like how it opens up into a more
beatdriven track, but then that kind of goes nowhere and
then that keyboardy thing comes in and it sounds like
everything else and I lose interest.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2006-06-04 13:13 [#01913156]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



thanks qrter! everyone seems to dislike something different
about that first track. in a way im glad about that! least i
got more then 'yeh thats ok' which is what usually happens.


 


Messageboard index