hilarious ipod tube amplifier | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 630 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
hilarious ipod tube amplifier
 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-05-04 13:52 [#01892728]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TUBE

you get the joke ? ipod and tube...

still nothing ? come on - MP3 AND TUBE

i mean LOSSY AUDIO AND TUBE

fucks sake


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2006-05-04 14:04 [#01892733]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



would this still be pointless even with the highest possible
bitrate for mp3s? I (obviously) know nothing about audio
technology. I don't even understand how the sound from a
portable cdplayer can differ from a regular one. is it the
circuit board? the wires? the voltage?

it's all too complicated. but yeah i'd agree that paying
over 3000 euros for an ipod amp seems hilarious indeed.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-05-04 14:06 [#01892734]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



i mean that's like pouring 91 oktane fuel into a ferrari.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-05-04 14:15 [#01892738]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



oh its actually real. good grief


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-04 14:17 [#01892741]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



damn thats expensive, i just bought a really nice portable
amp for the ipod for $56 (£30).


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-04 14:33 [#01892743]
Points: 6563 Status: Regular



you can get replacement firmware for ipod which plays FLAC
etc.


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2006-05-04 14:56 [#01892751]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



although you can play aiff/wav and apple lossless on them,
with un-modified firmware


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-05 00:22 [#01893000]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker



Why'd you put disto on an iPod?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-05-05 00:55 [#01893009]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



You'd be far better spending your money on a sonic impact
t-amp and some half decent speakers imo. Oh and it'd cost
about 1/20th of the price.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-05-05 01:25 [#01893025]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01893009



i mean it just makes me smile how really good brands now
start to put foe example usb ports for mp3 players into
high-definition amplifiers....

i mean why spending a few thousad bucks on electronic gear
to listen to hissy mp3's ?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-05-05 01:42 [#01893032]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to sadist: #01893025 | Show recordbag



What really winds me up is when people say, "There's no
difference between the sound quality 320kbps VBR Mp3s and
CDs" (J198- this isn't refering to you; you were only asking
about that possibility, not stating it as fact). YES THERE
BLOODY IS!

What people actually mean is, to the undiscerning ear,
listening through an ipod's headphone out port, to fairly
low end headphones, there's not any difference. As soon as
you start hooking it up to even mid range hi-fi gear the
difference leaps out at you.

My T-amp (£20, but sounds more like £800) can quite
clearly give enough detail to show the difference in sound
quality between two copies of the same of the same track,
one on my gf's ipod as 320kbps and the other on my CD
player. This is for all tracks (4'33 and similar
excepted ;-P), let alone ones that are famous for being
particularly affected in sound by mp3ing them.

Don't get the wrong idea; I'm no audiophile snob. MP3s have
their place and as a portable music solution, or just when
at a computer, they're superb at what they do (even though
.ogg etc. do it better). However, as soon as we're talking
£4K hi-fi the idea becomes laughable. I suspect the reason
people (with more money than sense) will buy these for their
ipods isn't the sound quality, but more about aesthetics
(how on earth could you connect your ipod to anything that
isn't the same distinct shade of white?!) and bragging
rights.

Which, is precisely why in its niche market, it will do
well. Ipods have always been about design, aesthetics and
bragging rights, rather than sound quality or functional
superiorty.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2006-05-05 02:30 [#01893051]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01893032



i have exactly the same thoughts!


 

offline _awt_ from Malmö (Sweden) on 2006-05-05 02:33 [#01893052]
Points: 2202 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01893032



So have I !


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2006-05-05 02:52 [#01893062]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker



A sort of like amplifier was in a TV guide about a year ago,
I emailed them with the same argument and guess what... my
email was printed in the following edition.

I really like your Ferrari comparison.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-05-05 03:45 [#01893099]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to _awt_: #01893052 | Show recordbag



Do you mean you have always been about design, aesthetics
and bragging rights, rather than sound quality or functional

superiorty?


 

offline zero-cool on 2006-05-05 05:35 [#01893151]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker



whatt a fuckin joke


 


Messageboard index