|
|
solariumface
from brussels (Belgium) on 2006-04-26 02:42 [#01887126]
Points: 687 Status: Lurker
|
|
looks like a good fun project submit a one second track
|
|
i_x_ten
from arsemuncher on 2006-04-26 03:13 [#01887132]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular
|
|
its a nice concept, but i listened to the sample and it sounds a bit shit
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-04-26 04:25 [#01887158]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to i_x_ten: #01887132 | Show recordbag
|
|
My feelings exactly. It's a shame that this is effectively a "noise" compilation, the output of which you could get by switching rapidly between music channel televsions. The music would be more interesting if people could hear the track they are assigned tos previous seconds and sample/base their part around that. If people did that and the contributors were skilled enough, you would most likely get some insanely complex micro composition beat programming in it.
|
|
zero-cool
on 2006-04-26 06:27 [#01887208]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker
|
|
done and done
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2006-04-26 07:38 [#01887250]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
it does feel like you'rre waiting forr the good bit, but then you know it'll neverr come.
|
|
oxygenfad
from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2006-04-26 09:25 [#01887317]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular
|
|
That is going to be a pain in the ass to write that track list :D
|
|
kwarkie69
from ANTVERPIA (Belgium) on 2006-04-26 09:39 [#01887334]
Points: 62 Status: Lurker
|
|
Maybey an idea to put it on a "endless loop" vinyl (at least 500 pieces)
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-04-26 12:59 [#01887503]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to kwarkie69: #01887334
|
|
why at least 500 copies?
why not 100? why not 1?
|
|
kwarkie69
from ANTVERPIA (Belgium) on 2006-04-27 05:57 [#01887879]
Points: 62 Status: Lurker
|
|
i mean 500 endless loops of a second on the record
|
|
Messageboard index
|