MIDI controller / keyboard | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 313 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614130
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
MIDI controller / keyboard
 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 06:16 [#01742500]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



im just about to buy one. lets say i have 1000eto spend on
it. and i know nothing about them, basically, besides the
names like korg/clavia/yamaha/etc.

therefore im looking for advice, what should i get to easily
put my ideas into my pc and have ability to play with it
later in cubase or something like that. or maybe theres
better combination which i havent heard about ?

as for the start i dont need full spectrum of
knobs/buttons/etc, i guess, so please, if you have any
advices - share them in here :)



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-10-06 09:06 [#01742644]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to K300i: #01742500 | Show recordbag



Is it mainly for studio, or live work?

How good are you at playing the keyboard?

What sort of sounds/artists do you like?

Do you have a desktop PC or a laptop?


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 09:38 [#01742682]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



home purpose mainly. ive got few years of piano-playin
experience. sounds rather experimental, autechre, richard
devine, aswell as hafler trio and all sort of ambient stuff.
and PC of course, sound blaster audigy 2 external.
i was thinking about getting something just to record
somenice melodies, backgrounds,and stuff like that to
cubase, then editing it further and etc etc. is that the
idea of external controller?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-10-06 09:51 [#01742716]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to K300i: #01742682 | Show recordbag



Personally, I'd just get a midi controller keyboard and have
softsynths running on your PC to make the sound. I'm not
sure what the latency is like on an Audigy 2, but someone
should be along soon to comment on whether or not it'd be
easily playable (or if the lag would be too off-putting).

That way you could record the midi in and re-arrange,
sequence, quantise, etc. the lines you play in. If you get
an actual hardware synth and just record the sound into the
PC (rather than the midi data) your options of editing it
afterwards are more limited.

You could of course play the midi data from a synth into
cubase, record that, then play it back from the PC into the
synth if you want the synth to make the sound.

Generally though softsynths are good value for money and a
lot of synths nowadays are only software in a box anyway,
rather than like analogue synths of old.

If you like ambience and melody, that sort of thing, I'd get
something that can do nice pads. Absynth by Native
Instruments would be a good choice software-wise. I'm sure a
hardware buff will be along to recommend a good hardware
synth that's nice for pads.


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 09:58 [#01742737]
Points: 670 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01742716



but basically whats the difference between MIDI controler
and typical keyboard ? like korg ? or clavia ? if i will
record the melody in cubase while playing live, then i will
be able to edit it how i like,right ? so, besides nice
software ( which i have already ) what do i need ?
controller that allow me to play and record live ? and is it
true that most of these hardware toys have multiple effects
so that you can arrange the sound already at the moment of
playing on them ?
im new to that thing, i really need bacis explanations :)
maybe some examples of some nice toys so i would look and
see whats going on , or even links to sites where someone
says what a basic amateur musician should do in his studio?


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-06 10:03 [#01742751]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to K300i: #01742737



A midi controller has no sounds on it - it purely controlls
other devices, like software or hardware synthesisers.
Keyboards and synths actually produce the sound rather than
control other devices.


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 10:13 [#01742758]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



ok, so, if i want to make sounds and record them into PC i
should go for keyboards right ? and if i want to control
some synths, i should go for MIDI...now- can i controlany
software synth with a controller ?like FM7 or absynth ? and
then, record it ic PC ?still have no clue:)


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 10:15 [#01742760]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



like this one - im connecting that one into PC and then
what ? launch absymth and play with sounds ? and then record
it if i like the sound for further editing ? sorry for
stupid questions :P


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-06 10:29 [#01742777]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



Most beginners don't bother with keyborads and hardware
synths. Modern software synths are often as good. If you get
a midi controller you can control the software synths thus
making the controller just like a keyboard, but more
versatile. Yes you will be able to control pretty much any
software synth, such as FM7 and Absynth. I think its
definitely better you persuing this route rather than
getting some posh Korg workstation keyboard, and much
cheaper too.

That particular controller looks a bit too posh really,
unless you want to do really flambouyant piano type stuff.
You will need a sequencer on your PC to host the software
synths - you record your keystrokes into the sequencer,
which relays them into the synths, so you're not really
recording actual sound if you get me, just your keystrokes.
Its a bit hard to understand at first I know but if you
experiment around you will see what I mean.

In terms of a midi controller, I would recommend something a
bit more like this, which has a lot of knobs and
sliders on which you will be thankful for later.

What style of music do you want to make, maybe then I could
reccommend a sequencer that might suit you,


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 10:40 [#01742790]
Points: 670 Status: Regular | Followup to clint: #01742777



yay. lets say im interested in going into more ambiental
way, like scape label,or something really chilled out.no
breakcores,sharp synths,and stuff - just a mood for
evenings. i have colelctedvarioussoftwarethingies, and by
saying i wil be able to record a sound in sequencer- you
mean cubase for example ? are there betters ?


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 10:42 [#01742791]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



to be honest i was thinking about getting something with 88
keys, just for the sake of easily playable compositions
without hassle of changing the octaves,if you know what i
mean.


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 10:48 [#01742795]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



this list isniceas for the first look at 88-key ones :

fatar

mman

cme

fatar again



 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-06 10:54 [#01742799]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to K300i: #01742790



Yes I mean stuff like Cubase. That might be the best one for
you. There is an SL version which is cheaper - if you're
planning on buying...

I'd also look into Ableton Live, as you may find that suits
your style better, its quite different.

I would really see if you could get a controller with some
knobs and sliders, they are absolutely vital to my setup.


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-06 10:57 [#01742800]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to K300i: #01742795



Those first three all look quite good, I would be tempted to
go for the first or second just for £££ sakes. Man you
must have a lot of room!


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 11:39 [#01742837]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



m-audio..... hmmmmm. looks nice.

so in shortcut - impluggin that bastard into PC. im
launching any absynth-like software. im setting up all the
options. im playing what i see on screen, various sounds
blah blah. i can record it after a while in sequencer. im
playing with the recorded sound. right ?


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-06 12:51 [#01742912]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to K300i: #01742837



Mehh... kinda. You can kind of do it several ways really but
I suppose you could do that I think.


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 13:25 [#01742948]
Points: 670 Status: Regular | Followup to clint: #01742912



allright. thats one way. what are others,and what advantages
/ disadvantages MIDI contoller has ?


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-10-06 14:16 [#01743000]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to K300i: #01742948



I cannot really see any drawbacks to having a midi
controller for making music on your computer. As far as
intuitiveness and keeping your workflow going, its the only
option for making music. Although a poorly built controller
can really cause problems. Also, if your soundcard isn't up
to snuff, the latency can kill any benefits getting a
controller could give you. You won't have that problem. The
audigy 2 zs platinum cards will give you next to no latency
(altho I have other issues with those fuckers at creative,
but I won't get into that). I have heard really good things
about the third one that you linked to. Aparently, they are
extremely affordable, and solid in construction. The m-audio
ones are good too, although they are plastic, and the cme
keyboards are all solid metal. Hammer weighted keys would be
the only way to go for your uses. Also, you should get the
knobs. That adds another dimension to your composition
(especially if you are working on ambient music, being able
to control your delays and feedbacks and phasing with the
knobs while you are playing will become extremely
important).


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 19:24 [#01743173]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



allright - after a bit of research im interested in those
three options

edirol

m-audio pro 88

fatar 188

now. i like m-audio the most. loads of knobs =sliders,
hammer keys, looks minimalistic, weight = 20kg ( wow )
-makes it really really nice and proffesional- considering
the fact that i wont buy next one in nearest future, so
maybe thats the right choice.

edirol - looks a bit plastic for me, but its pretty much
similar - only the number of knobs is smaller. which makes
difference if i consider long time of usage of this one.

fatar - well, the last option,and i mean "the last".

so i pressume i will go for the first /second one.

additional q: i know edirol has some presets for software
( cubase, reason, fruity even ), thus im wondering
if m-audio will have an option to work with one of these
aswell. thats important since im using these soft's for now.
it says in description that m-audio offers "tactile command
over your favorite soft synths and digital audio sequencers
like Reason and Live". so that means that i would be able to
control those softwares, right ?

if the answer is "yes' i will probably goform-audio. it is
more xepensive, but that must mean something aswell.

so, how about that ?


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-06 19:36 [#01743176]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



sorry. 3 choices ( comes in/out to my headpretty fast hehe
)

edirol ( like above )
m-audio ( as above)

CME UF8

thats the one made of steel.but again,less knobs and sliders
than m-audio.

so here i have :

m-audio / edirol / cme uf8

how about that ??


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-10-07 00:06 [#01743264]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Honestly, I would put the m-audio in the third slot. Its
construction, although light, is probly cheap plastic.

As far as edirol is concerned, I have had a friend who had
constant problems with some of the sliders on his
controller, sent it in, and they sent it back, repaired,
only two different sliders weren't working. He sent that one
back, and they sent him a brand new one, that had a
non-responisve knob and another slider that wasn't working.
It also took them forever to return the controllers back to
him. Altho he is the only person who has had problems like
that, although I saw both the controllers when he had them,
and the problems were as described.

The cme uf8 sounds to be the sturdiest build out of the
three that you have noted. There is also this one
Novation x-station. I have it and I stand by it. Although I only
have a 25 key one, but you can get up to 61 keys for this
brand, and it also has a built in synthesizer. Its got 20
270 degree knobs, 4 endless 360 degree knobs, 9 sliders, a
bunch of assignable buttons, a section to control the start
stop and play section of your sequencer, and an assignable
x/y pad. Plus its a breeze to program, and can be used as a
midi router.


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-07 12:51 [#01743719]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



shit. i was temptedby the m-audio one. i wont take it to
stage,plus its heavy as fuck, so thats not only the
hammer-keys i guess. even if m-audio conctruction is some
kind of plastic composite, only the EMC has steel elements
- novation is plastic aswell. plus it has 61 instead of full
range of 88 keys, and i have 5 years of piano behind my
back - wouldnt i feel the difference ?

the fact that it has synth which is built in doesnt make me
horny- as i rather like to slowly record,master,edit and put
together instead of roughly live-playing.unless the
difference is reallyreallybig, although what i found are
comparisons between x-station ( 25 keys) with other
m-audiomodels ( ozonic ).so as standalone, still m-audio
gets better reviews.

cme is tempting aswell, but i wantedto stand by m-audio
because of its number of knobs and sliders - or maybe you
wont use 20 at one time anyway ?

i wastoldto get 88 hammer full-weight keys.novation has only
semi-weight, and not hammer ones.

tough decision. i dunno. i would reallyneed moreopinions,
suprisingly there are no more ppl at xlt digging hardware ?
i doubt it.

come on lads !


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-10-07 13:11 [#01743730]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



To be honest I dont think your preference of having 88
hammer action keys is very common - I play the piano, but I
really don't use my midi controller in the same way, I can't
see how hammer action would be much of an advantage unless
you actually want to play piano VSTs. I think the majority
of synths suit a rather different style than pianos. Just my
opinion though obviously.


 

offline Blicero from Ann Arbor, MI (United States) on 2005-10-07 13:17 [#01743736]
Points: 85 Status: Lurker



novation x-station or remote series...

my remote25 has made such a difference. i love it.


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-07 13:38 [#01743757]
Points: 670 Status: Regular | Followup to clint: #01743730



i was considering playing a piano sometimes just for myself,
therefore that baby would be not only usable as for vst
recordings, but aswell formy own pleasure - thats why i
wante dto have 88 keys. full spectrum


 

offline K300i from United Kingdom on 2005-10-07 16:08 [#01743876]
Points: 670 Status: Regular



guys, help me out plz:)


 

offline ymenard on 2005-10-07 21:31 [#01744107]
Points: 1001 Status: Regular



Yeah I love my midi controller... but Im also considering
buying myself a piano in the next 5 years, a real one.
Stand-up, some sort of old detuned piano that makes this
awesome "Arcade Fire" piano sound.

It'll be hard to move it out of my place ;)


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-10-11 23:55 [#01747362]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Hey. Go with the CME. You won't be playing 20 knobs at once.
That is what patch selectors are for.


 


Messageboard index