JACKO IS FREE | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 532 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614124
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
JACKO IS FREE
 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-13 15:50 [#01631675]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker



just saw it on the telly. he got cleared of the lot.


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-06-13 15:51 [#01631677]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular



yeah, we know. Go to the thread about Jacko's Verdict.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-06-13 15:51 [#01631680]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



*embarrassing*


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-13 15:51 [#01631681]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01631677



yes.................................................*runs
away


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-13 15:52 [#01631682]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker



tridenti


 

offline xceque on 2005-06-13 15:52 [#01631683]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



pffft. This is so 30 minutes ago.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2005-06-13 15:53 [#01631684]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i don't know why the verdict was innocent (I didn't follow
the trials at all, couldn't care less honestly), but my mind
was already made up about him. The only reason he got off is
because of his money, most likely. what a wankgargler.


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-13 15:54 [#01631687]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker | Followup to xceque: #01631683



yeah....i'm sooooo "embarrassed"


 

offline ToXikFB on 2005-06-13 15:54 [#01631688]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker | Followup to WeaklingChild: #01631682



i think jacko got him!!?!><><


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2005-06-13 15:55 [#01631693]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



that fag got away. damn sneaky bastards


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-06-13 15:56 [#01631695]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to swift_jams: #01631693



weaklingchild?


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-13 15:59 [#01631701]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01631695



fagot?


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-06-13 16:00 [#01631704]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to WeaklingChild: #01631701



did you know that faggots are actually pieces of wood used
to make camp fires? All too true I'm afraid.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2005-06-13 16:00 [#01631705]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01631695



no not weaklingchild. him, that guys cool/. i mean michael
jaxon


 

online big from lsg on 2005-06-13 16:00 [#01631706]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



he was innocent you numbnuts, do a poll on this to be
absolutely sure


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-13 16:01 [#01631708]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01631704



cool, cos i typed FAGOT. note the single G


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-06-13 16:01 [#01631709]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular | Followup to swift_jams: #01631705



oh right! yeah course. I bet he bribed the few who needed
it, though a couple of them were fans of his music already
allegedly. Bit unfair...


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2005-06-13 16:02 [#01631710]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



poll: was michael jackson innocent

yes

no



 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2005-06-13 16:03 [#01631712]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



i dont like kis music = i dont like him
kind of how i dont like alec baldwin because of his face.
ergh


 

offline DeleriousWeasel from Guam on 2005-06-13 16:03 [#01631713]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular



yes, though I think he probably did give alcohol to a child


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-13 16:14 [#01631721]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



That's great news for the guy! I hope he can now get his
career back on track. Even if he did interfere with kids, i
bet they enjoyed it. They usually do.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-06-13 16:23 [#01631725]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



i kinda wanted him to be guilty..


 

offline OK on 2005-06-13 16:27 [#01631726]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01631684



i did follow the veredict a bit and it was ovbious that he
would be declared innocent. no proof was presented. and the
accusatory part was exhibed as scam artists.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2005-06-13 16:33 [#01631730]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01631725



me too corrupted-girl. me too...


 

offline wankfarm on 2005-06-13 16:33 [#01631731]
Points: 29 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01631725



me too, but mainly just to watch those freaks outside the
court wail, man do they suck!


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-06-13 17:00 [#01631746]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



Thank fuck for WeaklingChild's update or I'd never have
known. Congratulations on being the third or possibly
eighteenth member of this board to divulge "exclusively"
this HOT FUCKING NEWS NUGGET


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-13 17:02 [#01631747]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01631746



youre special


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-06-13 17:08 [#01631750]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



LET'S DISCUSS MICHAEL JACKSON'S INNOCENCE ON THE
INTERNET.



 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-06-13 18:39 [#01631791]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



WHO GIVES A SHIT?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-06-13 18:41 [#01631793]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



TRIDENTI


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-06-13 18:47 [#01631796]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I don't see what the big here deal is. Even if he IS guilty,
he made Off the Wall so who cares what he does?


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2005-06-13 19:12 [#01631808]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #01631796 | Show recordbag



that's unquestionable logic


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-06-13 19:15 [#01631810]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



̠


Attached picture

 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2005-06-13 19:17 [#01631817]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to i_x_ten: #01631810 | Show recordbag



hahaha that old guy is priceless


 

offline Aphexisatwin from your mom's room (United States) on 2005-06-13 20:40 [#01631854]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



worst system of justice, ever....


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2005-06-13 21:44 [#01631899]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Aphexisatwin: #01631854 | Show recordbag



you are correct.


 

offline zguru from Lindale (Texas) (United States) on 2005-06-13 23:42 [#01631916]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



this is a victory for forty year old, burned out pop star,
child moleting, racially confused men everywhere.

finally someone is a voice for this minority in america


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2005-06-14 00:17 [#01631923]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to zguru: #01631916 | Show recordbag



haha


 

offline pf from Finland on 2005-06-14 00:34 [#01631927]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker



bong


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2005-06-14 02:43 [#01632025]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to OK: #01631726



It's comforting to see there are still people who actually
follow things and make their opinions on facts and
evidences...
(note : i'm not saying he IS guilty or NOT)

Worst justice system ever? Don't you think it would have
been the worst if they comdemned someone without the shadow
of a REAL proof???



 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2005-06-14 03:00 [#01632034]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



how the fuck did that happen?

I thought they had LOADS of evidence against him


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2005-06-14 03:39 [#01632067]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



its a media circus, the guy is fucking innocent. why dont
people leave the poor man alone now?

hes not a peadophile but its funny how many people want him

to be. its not even like it wasnt unanimous; he was not
guilty on all counts. that arviso lad is a blatent little
tearaway and his mum is a benefits whore.

funny how mcauley calkin etc. never had any issues with him?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-14 03:43 [#01632073]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular | Followup to DeleriousWeasel: #01631704



Actually a faggot is a bundle of sticks, not
individual ones. It's a subtle but a very, very
important distinction. Also lol at Bill Hicks.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-14 03:52 [#01632089]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular



I hate how these creatures with eyes and ears have the power
to cooperate as a system against one. Power games like this
only occur because of the current symmetry among humans, but
when I get my mail order penis enhancement pills everything
will change. I will be omnipotent. What I want will
happen. If I want to molest children there won't be a
military, real or imaginary that can stop me. This reminds
me of an interesting thought experiment I had in an attempt
to find out how a genious feels among so many lesser
intellectuals. I paid a bunch of mentally handicapped people
to hang around me all day and I really got to thinking. You
lose all desire to exploit anyone simply because they are
too easily exploitable. (It was fun at first but got
old). A much more positve "for the good of everyone" world
view develops. You can plainly see all the problems among
the rest as a whole, that they can't help but be completely
ignorant of. I think I'll stop writing this good post now.


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2005-06-14 03:56 [#01632093]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular | Followup to Exaph: #01632067



i agree.

i'd say something else, but you've covered everything.


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2005-06-14 04:45 [#01632147]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to pOgO: #01632034



That'll be because of the fucking media whores...you've all
been had...except Exaph, amen again to Exaph! :-)


 

offline welt on 2005-06-14 04:53 [#01632153]
Points: 2036 Status: Lurker



he's probably having a party now with child sex.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2005-06-14 04:55 [#01632158]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



thanks bob and merg; its nice to know there a some out there
that can remain grounded about this whole affair.


 

offline rustic from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-14 04:58 [#01632162]
Points: 151 Status: Lurker



If it wasn't wine in that coke can then what was it?

urghh


 

offline welt on 2005-06-14 04:59 [#01632164]
Points: 2036 Status: Lurker



i actually dont think that michael jackson is that CONFUSED.
i saw an interview and one of his advisors / managers was
like "come on, wear a breathing protection, this is gonna
add to your myth". and that's what it does.

i mean. you could argue with his massive cosmetic surgery.
but other stars do that to a simliar extent. cher for
instance.


 


Messageboard index