|
|
Mertens
from Motor City (United States) on 2005-05-17 14:06 [#01602652]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker
|
|
I've converted the AE detroit show to mp3 already and it sounds terrific. Still I know some of you might want flac. I've been looking for converters and have only found flac->wav. Gimme some links to wav->flac converters if you know of any. Thanks!
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-05-17 14:12 [#01602658]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Go flac yourself.
Go to here (official) and peep the download page :)
|
|
xceque
on 2005-05-17 14:13 [#01602659]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
flac frontend
|
|
weatheredstoner
from same shit babes. (United States) on 2005-05-17 14:15 [#01602665]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker
|
|
whats the point of turning an mp3 into flac? Now you have a huge fucking file @ mp3 quality.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-05-17 14:16 [#01602666]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01602665 | Show recordbag
|
|
Learn to read.
|
|
Mertens
from Motor City (United States) on 2005-05-17 14:20 [#01602670]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker
|
|
flacing in progress
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-05-17 14:21 [#01602671]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Foobar2000 Check it,
Also, im still confused why people (ignore this mertens, this is just a general observation) why people are taking recordsing and releasing them under FLAC?
i don't understand how the quality is that good to begin with, that 320MP3 sure as hell wouldnt warrant??
I'll take a high end mp3 rip of it tho :D
I just don't understand why people are pushing FLACs for mini-disc type recordings
If it's from the soundboard, then yes i'd do flac, but why is everyone taking MD recordings and releasing them as FLAC?
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-05-17 14:24 [#01602676]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01602671 | Show recordbag
|
|
Because storage space is not really an issue and it prevents any further generational loss of audio quality. I can't tell much difference myself though. I suppose people feel better with the almost lossless nature of it.
|
|
Mertens
from Motor City (United States) on 2005-05-17 14:25 [#01602679]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker
|
|
Actually I was thinking the same thing. The mp3 sound quality of this recording is 128kps @ 44Khz. But flac wouldn't hurt. Nothing wrong with variety.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-05-17 14:46 [#01602697]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Sure do it up, i wont complain
i was still just curious why people were doing it. No matter
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2005-05-17 15:10 [#01602741]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular
|
|
i use dBPowerAmp to convert
|
|
weatheredstoner
from same shit babes. (United States) on 2005-05-17 16:33 [#01602845]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker
|
|
Oops.
In any case, its still worthless to do MD > FLAC. WAV>FLAC is awesome though.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2005-05-17 16:34 [#01602846]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01602845 | Show recordbag
|
|
:)
|
|
vacant
from NYC (United States) on 2005-05-17 17:22 [#01602863]
Points: 365 Status: Regular
|
|
are you sharing the mp3 on slsk? whats your name
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-05-17 17:34 [#01602871]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01602671 | Show recordbag
|
|
hahahah!
high end mp3
|
|
Vin3islih
from United Kingdom on 2005-05-19 12:03 [#01605105]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01602845
|
|
you're just an idiot. Post count size definitely does not correspond to intelligence.
|
|
Messageboard index
|