[Phob] Msg Brd Proposition | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 606 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[Phob] Msg Brd Proposition
 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-05-12 17:05 [#01596851]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



When you do the "Newest Messages at the top"
could you add the reply box to be up there as well?

That would be really nice.



 

offline jkd from Twitch City (Canada) on 2005-05-12 17:08 [#01596859]
Points: 1138 Status: Lurker



ummmmmm....

i don't know about you, but i've already got a newest
messages first feature. have a look in the top right.

reply box is still at the bottom though, so your request
stands.

:)



 

offline jkd from Twitch City (Canada) on 2005-05-12 17:10 [#01596860]
Points: 1138 Status: Lurker | Followup to jkd: #01596859



you moron. when he said "when you do the newest..." what he
meant was, "when one chooses the newest...".

retard.



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-05-12 17:10 [#01596861]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



re-read what i wrote

>_<


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2005-05-12 17:10 [#01596862]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



i think he spends enough time here that he is well aware of
that.
i guess his point is that, as you say, the reply is at the
bottom when the new ones are at the top.

the reply box should be at whatever place the newest message
is.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-05-12 17:10 [#01596863]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



wait, what the....


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2005-05-12 17:12 [#01596866]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



um i should have 'followed up' to jkd's first post.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-05-12 17:12 [#01596867]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



This is the beautiful song of the Msg Brd.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-05-12 17:12 [#01596868]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



man you guys are so fucking confused. :P


 

offline mimi on 2005-05-12 17:13 [#01596869]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



seems like a very human reaction to me, Carl.


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2005-05-12 17:15 [#01596871]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



1st post - idea
2nd post - response based on incorrect interpretation of 1st
post
3rd post - self directed clarification that 2nd post was
silly
4th post - telling 2nd post author should re read 1st post
5th post - " "
6th post - confusion
7th post - is 6th post confused about my post?
clarification.
8th post - shit
9th post - statment about cnofusion
10th post (or whatever this is) - clearing up the confusion


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-05-12 17:17 [#01596875]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I'm naked.


 

offline jkd from Twitch City (Canada) on 2005-05-12 17:21 [#01596884]
Points: 1138 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01596871



lol, exactly



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-05-12 17:22 [#01596886]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



LOL MSGBOARDSOAPOPERAWHOSEMYREALDAD?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-05-12 17:24 [#01596888]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01596871



my post weren't shit!



 

offline big from lsg on 2005-05-12 17:27 [#01596894]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01596888 | Show recordbag



you broke the matrix!


 

offline mimi on 2005-05-12 17:27 [#01596896]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



my post wasn't a statment about cnofusion


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-05-12 17:29 [#01596902]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



*come jumpin in over mimi and breakdances all over thread*


 

offline nacmat on 2005-05-12 17:59 [#01596956]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



great idea really


 

offline big from lsg on 2005-05-12 18:03 [#01596960]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



no, having the first post near keeps more on topic


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-05-12 18:07 [#01596975]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



yeah i am not really using the "newest post on top"

it does cause confusion

i was just saying, (i just tried it out for first time) and
it didn't seem logical that the fast reply was at the
bottom,


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2005-05-12 18:08 [#01596977]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #01596960



you dont actually understand what this is about, do you?


 

offline big from lsg on 2005-05-12 18:11 [#01596982]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01596977 | Show recordbag



i guess not?
no i think i do


 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2005-05-12 19:03 [#01597000]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



reading newest message first is a bit silly, eh?


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2005-05-12 19:09 [#01597002]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



it's shit, and for gays


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-05-12 19:31 [#01597013]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Newest message first. This is the only messageboard I've
ever done this on though.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-05-12 19:55 [#01597028]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



i give up on you people


 


Messageboard index