|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2005-04-27 13:08 [#01577849]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular
|
|
im:f pow! and forck_02lynix blam!
the forck tunes are more electro based, and are about 3-4 years old. i don't like them much but maybe someone will.
|
|
r40f
from qrters tea party on 2005-04-27 14:39 [#01577911]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular
|
|
hey, man! you've gotta start labelling these threads better or i'll never find 'em! :D
|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2005-04-27 15:08 [#01577940]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah i had a feeling it would kinda slip by. ambiguous titles are my forté
|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2005-04-27 15:32 [#01577953]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular
|
|
also i'd appreciate some feedback on the electro tunes (forck), as they were done many years ago. i might take them all and remix them because every time i hear them, i don't like listening to them.
|
|
r40f
from qrters tea party on 2005-04-27 15:50 [#01577961]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular
|
|
kelnern 8 is really cool! i love the way the drums sound. this almost sounds like it could be the bare bones of a late-period swans tune, but a very rural one. i like this track a lot.
of past kittens ... hahah... i don't know what to say about that track. it's like an lsd-cowboy kitten-fucking pacman somehow. the chorus really made me laugh!
i'm sorry to say these electronic numbers aren't too hot, man. i think if you remix them and add more, they could definitely go somewhere... but right now, they're very repetative and there's not too much happening.
|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2005-04-27 16:04 [#01577967]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01577961
|
|
thanks for the positives, now on to the negatives! those were done, like i said, 3-4 years ago in fruityloops when i was just starting to do some programming and computer editing. i think now is a good time to go back to these and screw with them a bit.
|
|
Messageboard index
|