 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)recycle ...and 270 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614130 Today 2 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hmm, i started this a few months ago, last night i changed the way it is displayed. you can click on the images to see big versions. i dont know if i like it, the page jumps itself around. im trying to figure out a way to do it for all the photos on my site too. but anyways. i have a stack of 20 packages waiting to be scanned because ive been lazy. at first i wasnt sure about wanting my address to be revealed. i dont know though. i know most of them arnt that exciting. but together they are sort of. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahahaha =] |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it's an interesting concept -------wha? douche magazine? huh? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
and mail from andy dick? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
afaik there was only ever one issue. douchemagazine.com seems to be gone now but it said "douche is dead " for a while. that was right after the first issue. it was the guy who used to have plasticheart.com which is also now dead. its a nice magazine with art/photography stuff in it. i dont know why they didnt continue with it. it was a nicely (expensivly) printed magazine and it was cheap, i expect it just ended up costing a lot in time+money for just the guy or him and few people who were doing it. hopefully it will resurect itself oneday. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes, i figured it was probably an art magazine, really... "i dont know why they didnt continue with it." the title, perhaps? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
but hm. what do you think of the presentation method? good: everythings always on one page, never leave the page, you can always see everything at once. good with any resolution. bad: page jumps around a little. could be confusing. sorry those pictures arnt interesting. . its more of a conventional mthod, right now i think its broken in everything except firefox. its nice but doesnt adapt well for diff resolutions. id apprieciate any thoughts. i know the way im doing it on the postal log is a bit strange and unusual, but i dont think its bad. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what am I to do with all these photographs of your package? if you're talking about confusing - when I go to your main site, I almost get an epileptic fit. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
if you stopped spinning your eyeballs around it might help a little. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
on the contrary, i do think the postal log is a very good idea. but honestly, i don't really like the interface too much. it's a bit confusing. i like the frames-pussy version the most. simple and obvious. that's just my opinion though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
seriously. I click on things and nothing happens. I hate sites like that. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i like it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
haha, thanks |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hmm... thanks to the feedback from r40f and other people elsewhere i have taken a liking to the more normal method. i have cleaned it up and it should be fairily compatable. except there is a bug with it and safari. i have only really tested it on winIE5.5/6 and firefox, although i know it looks right on mostly everything somewhat recent except for safari. it only really looks proper at 1024x768 but should be usable at any resolution. please check it out if your interested and let me know. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
